Suppr超能文献

测量的头部CT/CTA皮肤剂量与重症监护病房患者的累积暴露量。

Measured Head CT/CTA Skin Dose and Intensive Care Unit Patient Cumulative Exposure.

作者信息

Nawfel R D, Young G S

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology (R.D.N., G.S.Y.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Radiology (R.D.N., G.S.Y.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Mar;38(3):455-461. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5040. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Estimates of cumulative CT/CTA radiation dose based on volumetric CT dose index have raised concern that neurological intensive care unit patient exposures may reach thresholds for deterministic skin injury. Because the accuracy of volumetric CT dose index for this purpose in unknown, we set out to directly measure head CT and CTA peak skin dose, assess the relationship of volumetric CT dose index to measured peak skin dose, and determine whether multiple CT/CTA exposures in typical patients in the neurological intensive care unit produce cumulative doses approaching or exceeding single-dose deterministic thresholds for skin injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a prospective study from 2011-2013, nanoDot optical stimulated luminescence dosimeters were used to measure head CT/CTA peak skin dose in 52 patients (28 female, 24 male; mean age, 63 years) divided equally between 2 CT scanners. Volumetric CT dose index and dose-length product were recorded for each examination. Peak skin dose was also measured on an acrylic skull phantom in each scanner. A 2-tailed, unpaired test was used to compare mean patient skin doses between the 2 scanners. The measured peak skin doses were then used to calculate cumulative peak skin dose in 4 typical patients in intensive care units who received multiple CT/CTA scans.

RESULTS

Head CT/CTA peak skin dose agreed between scanners in patients and phantoms: (scanner 1 CT/CTA: patients, 39.2 ± 3.7 mGy and 98.9 ± 5.3 mGy, respectively, versus phantom, 40.0 mGy and 105.4 mGy, respectively; scanner 2 CT/CTA: patients, 42.9 ± 9.4 mGy and 98.8 ± 7.4 mGy, respectively, versus phantom, 37.6 mGy and 95.2 mGy, respectively). Volumetric CT dose index overestimated peak skin dose by a factor of 1.4-1.9 depending on examination and CT scanner. Cumulative doses in 4 patients in the intensive care unit estimated from measured CT/CTA peak skin dose ranged from 1.9-4.5 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Directly measured radiation skin doses from head CT/CTA patient examinations are substantially lower than volumetric CT dose index. Measured peak skin dose confirms that multiple head CT/CTA examinations in representative patients in the neurological intensive care unit may produce cumulative doses exceeding the single-dose deterministic threshold for skin injury.

摘要

背景与目的

基于容积CT剂量指数对CT/CTA累积辐射剂量的估计引发了人们对神经重症监护病房患者辐射暴露可能达到确定性皮肤损伤阈值的担忧。由于容积CT剂量指数在此方面的准确性未知,我们着手直接测量头部CT和CTA的皮肤峰值剂量,评估容积CT剂量指数与实测皮肤峰值剂量之间的关系,并确定神经重症监护病房典型患者多次接受CT/CTA检查所产生的累积剂量是否接近或超过皮肤损伤的单剂量确定性阈值。

材料与方法

在一项2011 - 2013年的前瞻性研究中,使用纳米Dot光激发发光剂量计测量了52例患者(28例女性,24例男性;平均年龄63岁)的头部CT/CTA皮肤峰值剂量,这些患者平均分配在两台CT扫描仪上。记录每次检查的容积CT剂量指数和剂量长度乘积。还在每台扫描仪中的丙烯酸颅骨模型上测量了皮肤峰值剂量。采用双侧、不成对t检验比较两台扫描仪之间患者的平均皮肤剂量。然后,根据实测的CT/CTA皮肤峰值剂量计算了4例接受多次CT/CTA扫描的重症监护病房典型患者的累积皮肤峰值剂量。

结果

患者和模型中两台扫描仪测得的头部CT/CTA皮肤峰值剂量一致:(扫描仪1的CT/CTA:患者分别为39.2±3.7 mGy和98.9±5.3 mGy,模型分别为40.0 mGy和105.4 mGy;扫描仪2的CT/CTA:患者分别为42.9±9.4 mGy和98.8±7.4 mGy,模型分别为37.6 mGy和95.2 mGy)。根据检查和CT扫描仪的不同,容积CT剂量指数高估皮肤峰值剂量1.4 - 1.9倍。根据实测的CT/CTA皮肤峰值剂量估算的4例重症监护病房患者的累积剂量范围为1.9 - 4.5 Gy。

结论

头部CT/CTA患者检查直接测得的辐射皮肤剂量远低于容积CT剂量指数。实测的皮肤峰值剂量证实,神经重症监护病房中具有代表性的患者多次进行头部CT/CTA检查可能产生超过皮肤损伤单剂量确定性阈值的累积剂量。

相似文献

5
Entrance skin dosimetry and size-specific dose estimate from pediatric chest CTA.儿童胸部CTA的体表剂量测定和特定尺寸剂量估算
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Mar-Apr;8(2):97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
6
Reduction in radiation doses from paediatric CT scans in Great Britain.英国儿科CT扫描辐射剂量的降低
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1060):20150305. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150305. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

4
New recommendations for occupational radiation protection.职业辐射防护新建议。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 May;9(5):366-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.02.006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验