Suppr超能文献

地区贫困指数对医疗保险全国队列中冠状动脉支架使用情况的影响

Impact of Area Deprivation Index on Coronary Stent Utilization in a Medicare Nationwide Cohort.

作者信息

Tuliani Tushar A, Shenoy Maithili, Parikh Milind, Jutzy Kenneth, Hilliard Anthony

机构信息

1 Loma Linda University Medical Center , Loma Linda, California.

2 University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

Popul Health Manag. 2017 Aug;20(4):329-334. doi: 10.1089/pop.2016.0086. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

Abstract

Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a marker of neighborhood deprivation. This study investigates utilization of coronary bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) in Medicare patients across hospitals with varying ADI. Data were abstracted using Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) codes 249 (BMS without major complications or comorbidities [MCC]), 246, and 247 (DES with and without MCC, respectively) from the 2011-2012 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data Inpatient File, which was linked to American Hospital Association data (to determine bed size, location, ownership, teaching status), and ADI for each hospital zip code was obtained. Hospitals were divided into quintiles using ADI values: Quintile 1 (privileged) to Quintile 5 (deprived). Logistic regression was conducted to determine odds ratios (ORs) for DES utilization across ADI quintiles. There were 313,739 discharges with DRG codes 246 (52,839), 247 (203,928), and 249 (56,972). DES utilization was lower in the deprived quintile, irrespective of teaching status. It was lower in larger hospitals and hospitals with more annual stent discharges, urban locations and nongovernment not-for-profit institutes. Lower odds of DES utilization were found in Quintile 2 (OR-0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.93, P < 0.001), Quintile 3 (OR-0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.92, P < 0.001), and Quintile 4 (OR-0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, P = 0.001) versus Quintile 1 and there was no difference in utilization of DES in Quintile 5 (OR-1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.04, P = 0.6) versus Quintile 1. Significant differences exist in DES utilization in a large, uniformly insured cohort based on neighborhood deprivation.

摘要

地区贫困指数(ADI)是社区贫困程度的一个指标。本研究调查了不同ADI水平的医院中医疗保险患者使用冠状动脉裸金属支架(BMS)和药物洗脱支架(DES)的情况。使用诊断相关组(DRG)编码249(无重大并发症或合并症[MCC]的BMS)、246和247(分别为有和无MCC的DES),从2011 - 2012年医疗保险提供者利用和支付数据住院患者文件中提取数据,该文件与美国医院协会数据相关联(以确定床位规模、位置、所有权、教学状况),并获取了每家医院邮政编码对应的ADI。根据ADI值将医院分为五等份:第1等份(富裕)至第5等份(贫困)。进行逻辑回归以确定不同ADI五等份中DES使用的比值比(OR)。有313,739例出院病例,DRG编码分别为246(52,839例)、247(203,928例)和249(56,972例)。无论教学状况如何,贫困五等份中的DES使用率都较低。在规模较大的医院、每年支架出院病例较多的医院、城市地区的医院以及非政府非营利机构中,DES使用率也较低。与第1等份相比,第2等份(OR - 0.9,95%置信区间[CI] 0.87 - 0.93,P < 0.001)、第3等份(OR - 0.89,95% CI 0.86 - 0.92,P < 0.001)和第4等份(OR - 0.95,95% CI 0.92 - 0.98,P = 0.001)中DES使用的几率较低,而第5等份与第1等份相比,DES使用率没有差异(OR - 1.01,95% CI 0.98 - 1.04,P = 0.6)。在一个大型、统一参保的队列中,基于社区贫困程度,DES使用存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验