Chau Ruby C M, Foster Liam, Yu Sam W K
a Department of Sociological Studies , The University of Sheffield , Sheffield , United Kingdom.
b Department of Social Work , Hong Kong Baptist University , Hong Kong.
J Women Aging. 2017 Nov-Dec;29(6):551-561. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2016.1256737. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
This article is concerned with the link between the effects of pro-market pension reforms on women and familization/defamilization measures. It aims to contribute to the study of this link in three ways. Firstly, it identifies defamilization/familization measures that have the potential to reduce negative effects of pro-market pension measures on women. Secondly, based on the examples from the United Kingdom, it shows that the government's willingness to provide sufficient defamilization/familization measures to assist women to deal with the negative effects of the pro-market pension measures should not be taken for granted. Thirdly, it suggests ways for tackling this problem.
本文关注亲市场养老金改革对女性的影响与家庭化/去家庭化措施之间的联系。它旨在通过三种方式为这一联系的研究做出贡献。首先，它确定了有可能减少亲市场养老金措施对女性负面影响的去家庭化/家庭化措施。其次，基于英国的例子，它表明政府愿意提供足够的去家庭化/家庭化措施以帮助女性应对亲市场养老金措施的负面影响，这一点不应被视为理所当然。第三，它提出了解决这个问题的方法。
