Nunome Mitsuo, Nakano Mikiharu, Tadano Ryo, Kawahara-Miki Ryoka, Kono Tomohiro, Takahashi Shinji, Kawashima Takaharu, Fujiwara Akira, Nirasawa Keijiro, Mizutani Makoto, Matsuda Yoichi
Avian Bioscience Research Center, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 20;12(1):e0169978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169978. eCollection 2017.
To assess the genetic diversity of domestic Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) populations, and their genetic relationships, we examined mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop sequences and microsatellite markers for 19 Japanese quail populations. The populations included nine laboratory lines established in Japan (LWC, Quv, RWN, WE, AWE, AMRP, rb-TKP, NIES-L, and W), six meat-type quail lines reimported from Western countries (JD, JW, Estonia, NIES-Br, NIES-Fr, and NIES-Hn), one commercial population in Japan, and three wild quail populations collected from three Asian areas. The phylogenetic tree of mtDNA D-loop sequences revealed two distinct haplotype groups, Dloop-Group1 and Dloop-Group2. Dloop-Group1 included a dominant haplotype representing most of the quail populations, including wild quail. Dloop-Group2 was composed of minor haplotypes found in several laboratory lines, two meat-type lines, and a few individuals in commercial and wild quail populations. Taking the breeding histories of domestic populations into consideration, these results suggest that domestic quail populations may have derived from two sources, i.e., domestic populations established before and after World War II in Japan. A discriminant analysis of principal components and a Bayesian clustering analysis with microsatellite markers indicated that the domestic populations are clustered into four genetic groups. The two major groups were Microsat-Group1, which contained WE, and four WE-derived laboratory lines (LWC, Quv, RWN, and AWE), and Microsat-Group2 consisting of NIES-L, JD, JW, Estonia, NIES-Br, NIES-Fr, NIES-Hn, W, and commercial and wild populations. The remaining two lines (AMRP and rb-TKP) were each clustered into a separate clade. This hierarchical genetic difference between domestic quail populations is attributed to the genetic background derived from two different genetic sources-the pre-war and post-war populations-which is well supported by their breeding histories.
为了评估日本鹌鹑(Coturnix japonica)国内种群的遗传多样性及其遗传关系,我们检测了19个日本鹌鹑种群的线粒体DNA(mtDNA)D环序列和微卫星标记。这些种群包括在日本建立的9个实验室品系(LWC、Quv、RWN、WE、AWE、AMRP、rb - TKP、NIES - L和W)、从西方国家重新引进的6个肉用型鹌鹑品系(JD、JW、爱沙尼亚、NIES - Br、NIES - Fr和NIES - Hn)、日本的一个商业种群以及从三个亚洲地区采集的三个野生鹌鹑种群。mtDNA D环序列的系统发育树揭示了两个不同的单倍型组,即D环 - 组1和D环 - 组2。D环 - 组1包含一个占主导地位的单倍型,代表了大多数鹌鹑种群,包括野生鹌鹑。D环 - 组2由在几个实验室品系、两个肉用型品系以及商业和野生鹌鹑种群中的少数个体中发现的次要单倍型组成。考虑到家养种群的繁殖历史,这些结果表明家养鹌鹑种群可能有两个来源,即在日本二战前后建立的家养种群。主成分判别分析和微卫星标记的贝叶斯聚类分析表明,家养种群聚为四个遗传组。两个主要组是微卫星 - 组1,包含WE以及四个源自WE的实验室品系(LWC、Quv、RWN和AWE),以及微卫星 - 组2,由NIES - L、JD、JW、爱沙尼亚、NIES - Br、NIES - Fr、NIES - Hn、W以及商业和野生种群组成。其余两个品系(AMRP和rb - TKP)各自聚为一个单独的分支。家养鹌鹑种群之间这种分层的遗传差异归因于源自两个不同遗传来源——战前和战后种群——的遗传背景,这在它们的繁殖历史中得到了充分支持。