Suppr超能文献

内镜超声引导下胆管入路与预切开乳头切开术在胆道插管失败患者中的应用:一项回顾性研究。

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access versus precut papillotomy in patients with failed biliary cannulation: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA.

Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2017 Feb;49(2):146-153. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-120995. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

Abstract

Precut papillotomy is widely used after failed biliary cannulation. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary access techniques are newer methods to facilitate access and therapy in failed cannulation. We evaluated the impact of EUS-guided biliary access on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) success and compared these techniques to precut papillotomy.  We retrospectively compared two ERCP cohorts. One cohort consisted of biliary ERCPs (n = 1053) attempted in patients with native papillae and surgically unaltered anatomy in whom precut papillotomy and/or EUS-guided biliary access were routinely performed immediately after failed cannulation. This cohort was compared with a similar ERCP cohort (n = 1062) in which only precut papillotomy was available for failed cannulation. The following outcomes were compared: conventional cannulation success, rates of attempted advanced access techniques (precut or EUS), precut success, EUS-guided biliary access success, and ERCP failure rates.  Although conventional cannulation success, rates of attempted advanced access technique (precut or EUS), and precut success were similar, the ERCP failure rate was lower when both EUS-guided biliary access and precut were available (1.0 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.4 - 1.6]), compared with when only precut was possible for failed access (3.6 % [95 %CI 2.5 - 4.7];  < 0.001). Success for EUS-guided biliary access (95.1 % [95 %CI 89.7 - 100]) was significantly higher than for precut (75.3 % [95 %CI 68.2 - 82.4];  < 0.001), and mainly due to superiority in malignant obstruction (93.5 % vs. 64 %;  < 0.001). EUS-guided biliary access decreases the rate of therapeutic biliary ERCP failure. Our results support the use of EUS-guided biliary access to optimize single-session ERCP success. In experienced hands, these techniques appear as effective, if not more so, than precut papillotomy.

摘要

经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)时如果胆管插管失败,常采用预切开胆管的方法。内镜超声(EUS)引导下胆管入路技术是一种新的辅助胆管插管和治疗的方法。本研究旨在评估 EUS 引导下胆管入路对 ERCP 成功率的影响,并与预切开胆管进行比较。

本研究回顾性比较了两组 ERCP 患者。一组为胆管 ERCP 患者(n=1053),这些患者的乳头为天然乳头,解剖结构未改变,在胆管插管失败后常规采用预切开胆管和/或 EUS 引导下胆管入路。将该组与另一组接受胆管插管失败时仅采用预切开胆管的 ERCP 患者(n=1062)进行比较。比较的结果包括常规胆管插管成功率、尝试高级胆管入路技术(预切开或 EUS)的比例、预切开成功率、EUS 引导下胆管入路成功率和 ERCP 失败率。

尽管常规胆管插管成功率、尝试高级胆管入路技术(预切开或 EUS)的比例和预切开成功率相似,但在 EUS 引导下胆管入路和预切开均可行时,ERCP 失败率较低(1.0%[95%置信区间(CI):0.4%1.6%]),而仅行预切开时 ERCP 失败率较高(3.6%[95%CI:2.5%4.7%];<0.001)。EUS 引导下胆管入路成功率(95.1%[95%CI:89.7%100%])显著高于预切开(75.3%[95%CI:68.2%82.4%];<0.001),这主要是由于恶性梗阻的成功率更高(93.5% vs. 64%;<0.001)。EUS 引导下胆管入路可降低治疗性 ERCP 失败率。本研究结果支持采用 EUS 引导下胆管入路来优化单次 ERCP 成功率。在有经验的医生手中,这些技术与预切开胆管一样有效,甚至可能更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验