Department of Gastroenterology, Ochsner Health - New Orleans, 1514 Jefferson Hwy, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020 Dec 4;22(12):62. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-00800-3.
Bile duct cannulation using conventional techniques fails in up to 16% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. Advanced techniques to gain biliary access include ERCP-based maneuvers, and newer endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions. In this article, we review the evidence supporting the use of various ERCP and EUS techniques for biliary access, as well as studies comparing these different techniques.
In comparative studies, biliary access after failed conventional cannulation was more successful with EUS-rendezvous compared to precut papillotomy. EUS-guided drainage compares favorably with percutaneous drainage with respect to clinical success, safety profile, and cost-efficiency. Recent randomized trials comparing EUS to ERCP drainage in malignant obstruction have found similar success rates between these techniques. EUS-guided techniques compare favorably to ERCP-based methods for biliary access and drainage. The advent of newer technologies to facilitate interventional EUS may further change current treatment approaches.
在经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)中,传统胆管插管技术的失败率高达 16%。获得胆管入路的先进技术包括基于 ERCP 的操作以及新的内镜超声(EUS)引导下的介入。本文回顾了支持使用各种 ERCP 和 EUS 技术获得胆管入路的证据,以及比较这些不同技术的研究。
在对照研究中,与预切开乳头切开术相比,EUS 会师技术在常规插管失败后的胆管入路成功率更高。EUS 引导下引流在临床成功率、安全性和成本效益方面优于经皮引流。最近比较 EUS 与 ERCP 引流治疗恶性梗阻的随机试验发现,这些技术的成功率相似。EUS 引导下的技术在胆管入路和引流方面优于基于 ERCP 的方法。促进介入性 EUS 的新技术的出现可能会进一步改变当前的治疗方法。