• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别电子烟用户生成内容的主题:来自多个社交媒体平台的案例研究

Identifying Topics for E-Cigarette User-Generated Contents: A Case Study From Multiple Social Media Platforms.

作者信息

Zhan Yongcheng, Liu Ruoran, Li Qiudan, Leischow Scott James, Zeng Daniel Dajun

机构信息

Department of Management Information Systems, Eller College of Management, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

The State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5780.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.5780
PMID:28108428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5291865/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) is an emerging product with a rapid-growth market in recent years. Social media has become an important platform for information seeking and sharing. We aim to mine hidden topics from e-cigarette datasets collected from different social media platforms.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to gain a systematic understanding of the characteristics of various types of social media, which will provide deep insights into how consumers and policy makers effectively use social media to track e-cigarette-related content and adjust their decisions and policies.

METHODS

We collected data from Reddit (27,638 e-cigarette flavor-related posts from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2015), JuiceDB (14,433 e-juice reviews from June 26, 2013 to November 12, 2015), and Twitter (13,356 "e-cig ban"-related tweets from January, 1, 2010 to June 30, 2015). Latent Dirichlet Allocation, a generative model for topic modeling, was used to analyze the topics from these data.

RESULTS

We found four types of topics across the platforms: (1) promotions, (2) flavor discussions, (3) experience sharing, and (4) regulation debates. Promotions included sales from vendors to users, as well as trades among users. A total of 10.72% (2,962/27,638) of the posts from Reddit were related to trading. Promotion links were found between social media platforms. Most of the links (87.30%) in JuiceDB were related to Reddit posts. JuiceDB and Reddit identified consistent flavor categories. E-cigarette vaping methods and features such as steeping, throat hit, and vapor production were broadly discussed both on Reddit and on JuiceDB. Reddit provided space for policy discussions and majority of the posts (60.7%) holding a negative attitude toward regulations, whereas Twitter was used to launch campaigns using certain hashtags. Our findings are based on data across different platforms. The topic distribution between Reddit and JuiceDB was significantly different (P<.001), which indicated that the user discussions focused on different perspectives across the platforms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study examined Reddit, JuiceDB, and Twitter as social media data sources for e-cigarette research. These mined findings could be further used by other researchers and policy makers. By utilizing the automatic topic-modeling method, the proposed unified feedback model could be a useful tool for policy makers to comprehensively consider how to collect valuable feedback from social media.

摘要

背景

电子烟是近年来市场迅速增长的新兴产品。社交媒体已成为信息搜索和分享的重要平台。我们旨在从不同社交媒体平台收集的电子烟数据集中挖掘隐藏主题。

目的

本文旨在系统了解各类社交媒体的特征,这将为消费者和政策制定者如何有效利用社交媒体跟踪电子烟相关内容并调整其决策和政策提供深刻见解。

方法

我们从Reddit(2011年1月1日至2015年6月30日期间27,638条与电子烟口味相关的帖子)、JuiceDB(2013年6月26日至2015年11月12日期间14,433条电子烟油评论)和Twitter(2010年1月1日至2015年6月30日期间13,356条与“电子烟禁令”相关的推文)收集数据。潜在狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet Allocation),一种用于主题建模的生成模型,被用于分析这些数据中的主题。

结果

我们在各平台发现了四类主题:(1)促销,(2)口味讨论,(3)经验分享,以及(4)监管辩论。促销包括商家向用户的销售以及用户之间的交易。Reddit上10.72%(2,962/27,638)的帖子与交易相关。在社交媒体平台之间发现了促销链接。JuiceDB中的大多数链接(87.30%)与Reddit帖子相关。JuiceDB和Reddit确定了一致的口味类别。电子烟的 vaping 方法以及诸如浸泡、击喉感和蒸汽产生等特征在Reddit和JuiceDB上都得到了广泛讨论。Reddit为政策讨论提供了空间,大多数帖子(60.7%)对监管持负面态度,而Twitter则用于使用特定主题标签发起活动。我们的发现基于不同平台的数据。Reddit和JuiceDB之间的主题分布存在显著差异(P<.001),这表明跨平台的用户讨论聚焦于不同视角。

结论

本研究考察了Reddit、JuiceDB和Twitter作为电子烟研究的社交媒体数据源。其他研究人员和政策制定者可进一步利用这些挖掘出的结果。通过利用自动主题建模方法,所提出的统一反馈模型可能成为政策制定者全面考虑如何从社交媒体收集有价值反馈的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/264b/5291865/3df1cb62a131/jmir_v19i1e24_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/264b/5291865/64cc36626cfb/jmir_v19i1e24_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/264b/5291865/3df1cb62a131/jmir_v19i1e24_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/264b/5291865/64cc36626cfb/jmir_v19i1e24_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/264b/5291865/3df1cb62a131/jmir_v19i1e24_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Topics for E-Cigarette User-Generated Contents: A Case Study From Multiple Social Media Platforms.识别电子烟用户生成内容的主题:来自多个社交媒体平台的案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5780.
2
Topics and Sentiment Surrounding Vaping on Twitter and Reddit During the 2019 e-Cigarette and Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury Outbreak: Comparative Study.主题和情绪围绕着 2019 年电子烟和蒸气相关肺损伤爆发期间 Twitter 和 Reddit 上的蒸气:比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 13;24(12):e39460. doi: 10.2196/39460.
3
User Perceptions of Different Electronic Cigarette Flavors on Social Media: Observational Study.社交媒体上用户对不同电子烟口味的认知:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 24;22(6):e17280. doi: 10.2196/17280.
4
Analysis of symptoms and their potential associations with e-liquids' components: a social media study.症状分析及其与电子烟液成分的潜在关联:一项社交媒体研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 30;16:674. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3326-0.
5
Characterizing Social Media Messages Related to Underage JUUL E-Cigarette Buying and Selling: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Reddit Subreddits.描述与未成年人购买和销售JUUL电子烟相关的社交媒体信息:Reddit子版块的横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e16962. doi: 10.2196/16962.
6
An Examination of Electronic Cigarette Content on Social Media: Analysis of E-Cigarette Flavor Content on Reddit.社交媒体上电子烟内容的考察:Reddit上电子烟口味内容分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 20;12(11):14916-35. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114916.
7
Electronic Cigarette-Related Contents on Instagram: Observational Study and Exploratory Analysis.Instagram 上电子烟相关内容:观察性研究与探索性分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Nov 5;6(4):e21963. doi: 10.2196/21963.
8
Public Reactions to the New York State Policy on Flavored Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study.公众对纽约州电子烟调味政策的反应:推特上的观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Feb 3;8(2):e25216. doi: 10.2196/25216.
9
A Social Media Study on the Associations of Flavored Electronic Cigarettes With Health Symptoms: Observational Study.一项关于调味电子烟与健康症状关联的社交媒体研究:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 22;22(6):e17496. doi: 10.2196/17496.
10
Sexually Transmitted Disease-Related Reddit Posts During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Latent Dirichlet Allocation Analysis.COVID-19 大流行期间与性传播疾病相关的 Reddit 帖子:潜在狄利克雷分配分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 31;24(10):e37258. doi: 10.2196/37258.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of physicians' statements on electronic cigarettes in YouTube videos in Türkiye: a thematic content analysis.土耳其YouTube视频中医生关于电子烟的声明分析:一项主题内容分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 19;25(1):1844. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23028-0.
2
Contextualizing Changes in e-Cigarette Use During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic and Accompanying Infodemic ("So Much Contradictory Evidence"): Qualitative Document Analysis of Reddit Forums.解析新冠疫情早期电子烟使用情况的变化以及随之而来的信息疫情(“如此多相互矛盾的证据”):对Reddit论坛的定性文献分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 20;27:e66010. doi: 10.2196/66010.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Identity Management and Mental Health Discourse in Social Media.社交媒体中的身份管理与心理健康话语
Proc Int World Wide Web Conf. 2015 May;2015(Companion):315-321. doi: 10.1145/2740908.2743049.
2
Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison.电子烟网络营销:多地点、多产品比较。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2015 Sep 11;1(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.4777. eCollection 2015 Jul-Dec.
3
An Examination of Electronic Cigarette Content on Social Media: Analysis of E-Cigarette Flavor Content on Reddit.
Content analysis of conversations on Reddit: reactions to FDA's ENDS prioritized enforcement policy.
Reddit上对话的内容分析:对美国食品药品监督管理局电子烟产品优先执法政策的反应
Front Commun (Lausanne). 2024;9:1348158. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2024.1348158. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
4
The Use of Natural Language Processing Methods in Reddit to Investigate Opioid Use: Scoping Review.利用自然语言处理方法在 Reddit 上调查阿片类药物使用情况:范围综述。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Sep 13;4:e51156. doi: 10.2196/51156.
5
The role of β-Nicotyrine in E-Cigarette abuse liability I: Drug Discrimination.β-烟碱在电子烟滥用倾向中的作用I:药物辨别
bioRxiv. 2024 Jul 16:2024.07.12.603310. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.12.603310.
6
Relationship Between Product Features and the Prices of e-Cigarette Devices Sold in Web-Based Vape Shops: Comparison Study Using a Linear Regression Model.基于网络的电子烟商店所售电子烟设备的产品特征与价格之间的关系:使用线性回归模型的比较研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 9;8:e49276. doi: 10.2196/49276.
7
Multiple-Perspective Data-Driven Analysis of Online Health Communities.在线健康社区的多视角数据驱动分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 12;11(20):2723. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202723.
8
Social Media Use and Subsequent E-Cigarette Susceptibility, Initiation, and Continued Use Among US Adolescents.社交媒体使用与美国青少年随后的电子烟易感性、使用起始和持续使用。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 7;20:E78. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220415.
9
Implicit Incentives Among Reddit Users to Prioritize Attention Over Privacy and Reveal Their Faces When Discussing Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results: Topic and Attention Analysis.Reddit用户中存在的隐性激励因素:在讨论直接面向消费者的基因检测结果时,优先考虑关注度而非隐私并透露自己的面容——主题与关注度分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 3;2(2):e35702. doi: 10.2196/35702. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
10
How Attitude and Para-Social Interaction Influence Purchase Intentions of Mukbang Users: A Mixed-Method Study.态度和准社会互动如何影响吃播用户的购买意愿:一项混合方法研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 2;13(3):214. doi: 10.3390/bs13030214.
社交媒体上电子烟内容的考察:Reddit上电子烟口味内容分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 20;12(11):14916-35. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114916.
4
Using Twitter Data to Gain Insights into E-cigarette Marketing and Locations of Use: An Infoveillance Study.利用推特数据洞察电子烟营销及使用地点:一项信息监测研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 6;17(11):e251. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4466.
5
Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter.社交倾听:对推特上电子烟讨论的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 27;17(10):e243. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4969.
6
What Online Communities Can Tell Us About Electronic Cigarettes and Hookah Use: A Study Using Text Mining and Visualization Techniques.在线社区能告诉我们关于电子烟和水烟使用的哪些信息:一项运用文本挖掘和可视化技术的研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Sep 29;17(9):e220. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4517.
7
Assessing Electronic Cigarette-Related Tweets for Sentiment and Content Using Supervised Machine Learning.使用监督式机器学习评估与电子烟相关推文的情感和内容
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 25;17(8):e208. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4392.
8
Associations Between E-Cigarette Type, Frequency of Use, and Quitting Smoking: Findings From a Longitudinal Online Panel Survey in Great Britain.电子烟类型、使用频率与戒烟之间的关联:来自英国一项纵向在线小组调查的结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1187-94. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv078. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
9
Marketing practices of vapor store owners.电子烟商店店主的营销行为。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun;105(6):e16-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302610. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
10
Counseling patients on the use of electronic cigarettes.对患者进行电子烟使用方面的咨询。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Jan;90(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.11.004.