University of Southern California Department of Preventive Medicine Los Angeles, CA United States.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2015 Sep 11;1(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.4777. eCollection 2015 Jul-Dec.
Electronic cigarette awareness and use has been increasing rapidly. E-cigarette brands have utilized social networking sites to promote their products, as the growth of the e-cigarette industry has paralleled that of Web 2.0. These online platforms are cost-effective and have unique technological features and user demographics that can be attractive for selective marketing. The popularity of multiple sites also poses a risk of exposure to social networks where e-cigarette brands might not have a presence.
To examine the marketing strategies of leading e-cigarette brands on multiple social networking sites, and to identify how affordances of the digital media are used to their advantage. Secondary analyses include determining if any brands are benefitting from site demographics, and exploring cross-site diffusion of marketing content through multi-site users.
We collected data from two e-cigarette brands from four social networking sites over approximately 2.5 years. Content analysis is used to search for themes, population targeting, marketing strategies, and cross-site spread of messages.
Twitter appeared to be the most frequently used social networking site for interacting directly with product users. Facebook supported informational broadcasts, such as announcements regarding political legislation. E-cigarette brands also differed in their approaches to their users, from informal conversations to direct product marketing.
E-cigarette makers use different strategies to market their product and engage their users. There was no evidence of direct targeting of vulnerable populations, but the affordances of the different sites are exploited to best broadcast context-specific messages. We developed a viable method to study cross-site diffusion, although additional refinement is needed to account for how different types of digital media are used.
电子烟的认知度和使用率迅速上升。电子烟品牌利用社交网络平台来推广其产品,因为电子烟行业的增长与 Web 2.0 的增长是同步的。这些在线平台具有成本效益,并且具有独特的技术特点和用户特征,对于有选择性的营销可能具有吸引力。多个网站的普及也存在品牌可能没有出现的社交网络曝光风险。
研究领先电子烟品牌在多个社交网络平台上的营销策略,并确定数字媒体的功能如何为其带来优势。二次分析包括确定是否有任何品牌受益于网站的用户特征,以及探索通过多网站用户进行营销内容的跨网站扩散。
我们从四个社交网络平台上的两个电子烟品牌中收集了大约 2.5 年的数据。内容分析用于搜索主题、目标人群、营销策略和跨网站消息传播。
Twitter 似乎是与产品用户直接互动的最常用社交网络平台。Facebook 支持信息广播,例如有关政治立法的公告。电子烟品牌在与用户的互动方式上也有所不同,从非正式对话到直接的产品营销。
电子烟制造商使用不同的策略来推销其产品并吸引用户。没有证据表明直接针对弱势群体,但利用了不同网站的功能来最佳地传播特定于上下文的信息。我们开发了一种可行的方法来研究跨网站扩散,尽管需要进一步改进以考虑不同类型的数字媒体的使用方式。