• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison.电子烟网络营销:多地点、多产品比较。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2015 Sep 11;1(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.4777. eCollection 2015 Jul-Dec.
2
Exploring how the tobacco industry presents and promotes itself in social media.探索烟草行业在社交媒体上如何展示和推广自身。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 21;17(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3665.
3
Using Twitter Data to Gain Insights into E-cigarette Marketing and Locations of Use: An Infoveillance Study.利用推特数据洞察电子烟营销及使用地点:一项信息监测研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 6;17(11):e251. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4466.
4
Diffusion of Messages from an Electronic Cigarette Brand to Potential Users through Twitter.电子烟品牌信息通过推特向潜在用户的传播
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 18;10(12):e0145387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145387. eCollection 2015.
5
Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter - Spreading the Appeal of Flavors.推特上的电子烟——传播口味的吸引力。
Tob Regul Sci. 2015 Apr;1(1):36-41. doi: 10.18001/TRS.1.1.4. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
6
E-Cigarette Surveillance With Social Media Data: Social Bots, Emerging Topics, and Trends.利用社交媒体数据进行电子烟监测:社交机器人、新兴话题及趋势
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Dec 20;3(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8641.
7
Alcohol marketing on YouTube: exploratory analysis of content adaptation to enhance user engagement in different national contexts.YouTube 上的酒精营销:探索内容改编以增强不同国家背景下用户参与度的分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5035-3.
8
Exploring the e-cigarette e-commerce marketplace: Identifying Internet e-cigarette marketing characteristics and regulatory gaps.探索电子烟电子商务市场:识别互联网电子烟营销特征及监管漏洞。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Nov 1;156:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.032. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
9
A content analysis of the promotional strategies employed by e-cigarette brands on Twitter.对电子烟品牌在推特上采用的促销策略进行的内容分析。
Health Mark Q. 2019 Oct-Dec;36(4):307-321. doi: 10.1080/07359683.2019.1680121. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
10
E-Cigarette Social Media Messages: A Text Mining Analysis of Marketing and Consumer Conversations on Twitter.电子烟社交媒体信息:对推特上营销与消费者对话的文本挖掘分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Dec 12;2(2):e171. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6551.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Advertisement Trends After US Federal Policy Changes.美国联邦政策变化后电子尼古丁传送系统广告趋势
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2459188. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59188.
2
How to Identify e-Cigarette Brands Available in the United States During 2020-2022: Development and Usability Study.如何识别2020年至2022年美国市场上的电子烟品牌:开发与可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 28;8:e47570. doi: 10.2196/47570.
3
The commercial promotion of electronic cigarettes on social media and its influence on positive perceptions of vaping and vaping behaviours in Anglophone countries: A scoping review.社交媒体上电子烟的商业推广及其对英语国家对吸电子烟的积极认知和吸电子烟行为的影响:一项范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 17;4(1):e0002736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002736. eCollection 2024.
4
Why and how should children be protected from the deluge of vaping related media and marketing overexposure?为什么以及应该如何保护儿童免受与电子烟相关的媒体和营销过度曝光的影响?
Breathe (Sheff). 2023 Dec;19(4):230141. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0141-2023. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
5
Platform Effects on Public Health Communication: A Comparative and National Study of Message Design and Audience Engagement Across Twitter and Facebook.平台对公共卫生传播的影响:一项关于推特和脸书上信息设计与受众参与度的比较性全国研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Dec 20;2(2):e40198. doi: 10.2196/40198. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
6
How Facebook is used to promote ENDS products near four Big 10 universities: A qualitative analysis.脸书(Facebook)如何在十大联盟(Big 10)附近的四所大学附近推广电子烟:一项定性分析。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Jan;72(1):210-218. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2027425. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Predictors of marijuana vaping onset and escalation among young adults.年轻人吸食大麻电子烟的预测因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Nov 1;216:108320. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108320. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.信息流行病学与信息监测:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 28;22(4):e16206. doi: 10.2196/16206.
9
Vaccine-related advertising in the Facebook Ad Archive.脸书广告档案中的疫苗相关广告。
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 16;38(3):512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.066. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Relationship between social media engagement and e-cigarette policy support.社交媒体参与度与电子烟政策支持之间的关系。
Addict Behav Rep. 2018 Dec 14;9:100155. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100155. eCollection 2019 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Tweeting for and against public health policy: response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's electronic cigarette Twitter campaign.支持和反对公共卫生政策的推文:对芝加哥公共卫生部电子烟推特活动的回应
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 16;16(10):e238. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3622.
2
A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter.一项关于推特上电子烟营销情况的横断面调查。
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii26-30. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051551.
3
E-cigarette advertising expenditures in the U.S., 2011-2012.2011 - 2012年美国电子烟广告支出
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):409-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.003.
4
"Smoking revolution": a content analysis of electronic cigarette retail websites.“吸烟革命”:电子烟零售网站的内容分析
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.12.010.
5
Noncombustible tobacco product advertising: how companies are selling the new face of tobacco.非可燃烟草制品广告:烟草公司如何推销烟草新形象
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 May;16(5):606-14. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt200. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
6
A longitudinal study of electronic cigarette users.一项针对电子烟使用者的纵向研究。
Addict Behav. 2014 Feb;39(2):491-4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.028. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
7
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial.电子烟戒烟:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 Nov 16;382(9905):1629-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61842-5. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
8
EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study.电子香烟(ECLAT)作为传统香烟替代品的效率和安全性:一项前瞻性 12 个月随机对照设计研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066317. Print 2013.
9
Awareness and ever-use of electronic cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2010-2011.美国成年人对电子烟的认知和使用情况,2010-2011 年。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Sep;15(9):1623-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt013. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
e-Cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults.美国成年人对电子烟的认知、使用和危害认知。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Sep;102(9):1758-66. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300526. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

电子烟网络营销:多地点、多产品比较。

Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison.

机构信息

University of Southern California Department of Preventive Medicine Los Angeles, CA United States.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2015 Sep 11;1(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.4777. eCollection 2015 Jul-Dec.

DOI:10.2196/publichealth.4777
PMID:27227129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4869220/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic cigarette awareness and use has been increasing rapidly. E-cigarette brands have utilized social networking sites to promote their products, as the growth of the e-cigarette industry has paralleled that of Web 2.0. These online platforms are cost-effective and have unique technological features and user demographics that can be attractive for selective marketing. The popularity of multiple sites also poses a risk of exposure to social networks where e-cigarette brands might not have a presence.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the marketing strategies of leading e-cigarette brands on multiple social networking sites, and to identify how affordances of the digital media are used to their advantage. Secondary analyses include determining if any brands are benefitting from site demographics, and exploring cross-site diffusion of marketing content through multi-site users.

METHODS

We collected data from two e-cigarette brands from four social networking sites over approximately 2.5 years. Content analysis is used to search for themes, population targeting, marketing strategies, and cross-site spread of messages.

RESULTS

Twitter appeared to be the most frequently used social networking site for interacting directly with product users. Facebook supported informational broadcasts, such as announcements regarding political legislation. E-cigarette brands also differed in their approaches to their users, from informal conversations to direct product marketing.

CONCLUSIONS

E-cigarette makers use different strategies to market their product and engage their users. There was no evidence of direct targeting of vulnerable populations, but the affordances of the different sites are exploited to best broadcast context-specific messages. We developed a viable method to study cross-site diffusion, although additional refinement is needed to account for how different types of digital media are used.

摘要

背景

电子烟的认知度和使用率迅速上升。电子烟品牌利用社交网络平台来推广其产品,因为电子烟行业的增长与 Web 2.0 的增长是同步的。这些在线平台具有成本效益,并且具有独特的技术特点和用户特征,对于有选择性的营销可能具有吸引力。多个网站的普及也存在品牌可能没有出现的社交网络曝光风险。

目的

研究领先电子烟品牌在多个社交网络平台上的营销策略,并确定数字媒体的功能如何为其带来优势。二次分析包括确定是否有任何品牌受益于网站的用户特征,以及探索通过多网站用户进行营销内容的跨网站扩散。

方法

我们从四个社交网络平台上的两个电子烟品牌中收集了大约 2.5 年的数据。内容分析用于搜索主题、目标人群、营销策略和跨网站消息传播。

结果

Twitter 似乎是与产品用户直接互动的最常用社交网络平台。Facebook 支持信息广播,例如有关政治立法的公告。电子烟品牌在与用户的互动方式上也有所不同,从非正式对话到直接的产品营销。

结论

电子烟制造商使用不同的策略来推销其产品并吸引用户。没有证据表明直接针对弱势群体,但利用了不同网站的功能来最佳地传播特定于上下文的信息。我们开发了一种可行的方法来研究跨网站扩散,尽管需要进一步改进以考虑不同类型的数字媒体的使用方式。