• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本体论问题与文化心理学的可能发展。

Ontological Issues and the Possible Development of Cultural Psychology.

作者信息

Pérez-Campos Gilberto

机构信息

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, Estado de México, Mexico.

出版信息

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2017 Dec;51(4):643-669. doi: 10.1007/s12124-017-9379-5.

DOI:10.1007/s12124-017-9379-5
PMID:28110430
Abstract

Ontological issues have a bad reputation within mainstream psychology. This paper, however, is an attempt to argue that ontological reflection may play an important role in the development of cultural psychology. A cross-reading of two recent papers on the subject (Mammen & Mironenko, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 681-713, 2015; Simão Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 568-585, 2016), aimed at characterizing their respective approaches to ontological issues, sets the stage for a presentation of Cornelius Castoriadis' ontological reflections. On this basis, a dialogue is initiated with E.E. Boesch's Symbolic Activity Theory that could contribute to a more refined understanding of human psychological functioning in its full complexity.

摘要

本体论问题在主流心理学界声誉不佳。然而,本文试图论证本体论反思可能在文化心理学的发展中发挥重要作用。对最近两篇关于该主题的论文(马门和米罗年科,《综合心理与行为科学》,2015年第49卷第4期,第681 - 713页;西芒,《综合心理与行为科学》,2016年第50卷,第568 - 585页)进行交叉阅读,旨在刻画它们各自处理本体论问题的方法,为介绍科尼利厄斯·卡斯托里亚迪斯的本体论反思奠定了基础。在此基础上,与E.E. 博施的符号活动理论展开对话,这可能有助于更精细地理解人类心理功能的全貌。

相似文献

1
Ontological Issues and the Possible Development of Cultural Psychology.本体论问题与文化心理学的可能发展。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2017 Dec;51(4):643-669. doi: 10.1007/s12124-017-9379-5.
2
Once More about Boesch's Ontological Predication in Focus.再论博施本体论谓述的核心要点。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2017 Dec;51(4):670-679. doi: 10.1007/s12124-017-9396-4.
3
Ernst E. Boesch's Ontologic Predication in Focus.恩斯特·E·博施的本体论谓词聚焦
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Dec;50(4):568-585. doi: 10.1007/s12124-016-9354-6.
4
Concerning the Importance of Ontological Issues for Cultural Psychology: a Reply to Comments.关于本体论问题对文化心理学的重要性:对评论的回应
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2017 Sep;51(3):496-504. doi: 10.1007/s12124-017-9397-3.
5
Contemporary Dialogues between Rorty's Pragmatism and Cultural Psychology: a Reading of Jerome S. Bruner beyond 100.罗蒂实用主义与文化心理学的当代对话:超越百岁的杰罗姆·S·布鲁纳解读
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Dec;53(4):707-716. doi: 10.1007/s12124-019-09482-7.
6
A moderate eclecticism: ontological and epistemological issues.一种适度的折衷主义:本体论和认识论问题。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Mar;46(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s12124-011-9175-6.
7
Borders and Modal Articulations. Semiotic Constructs of Sensemaking Processes Enabling a Fecund Dialogue Between Cultural Psychology and Clinical Psychology.边界与模态衔接。意义建构过程的符号学建构,促成文化心理学与临床心理学之间富有成效的对话。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Mar;50(1):29-43. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9318-2.
8
Activity Theory: Quest for the Unattainable and Hope for the Future (Reply to Commentaries).活动理论:对无法实现之事的探寻与对未来的希望(对评论的回应)
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Sep;50(3):382-91. doi: 10.1007/s12124-016-9353-7.
9
To Encounter, to Build the World and to Become a Human Being. Advocating for a Material-Cultural Turn in Developmental Psychology.相遇、构建世界与成为人。倡导发展心理学中的物质文化转向。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Dec;50(4):586-602. doi: 10.1007/s12124-016-9356-4.
10
How cultural evolutionary theory can inform social psychology and vice versa.文化进化理论如何为社会心理学提供信息,反之亦然。
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):929-52. doi: 10.1037/a0017062.

引用本文的文献

1
Once More about Boesch's Ontological Predication in Focus.再论博施本体论谓述的核心要点。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2017 Dec;51(4):670-679. doi: 10.1007/s12124-017-9396-4.
2
Concerning the Importance of Ontological Issues for Cultural Psychology: a Reply to Comments.关于本体论问题对文化心理学的重要性:对评论的回应
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2017 Sep;51(3):496-504. doi: 10.1007/s12124-017-9397-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Ernst E. Boesch's Ontologic Predication in Focus.恩斯特·E·博施的本体论谓词聚焦
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Dec;50(4):568-585. doi: 10.1007/s12124-016-9354-6.
2
A Philosophical vs. a Psychological Perspective on Borders.关于边界的哲学视角与心理学视角
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Mar;50(1):77-90. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9333-3.
3
Duality of Categories or Dialectical Concepts?范畴的二元性还是辩证概念?
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2016 Jun;50(2):244-56. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9327-1.
4
Activity Theories and the Ontology of Psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian Experiences.活动理论与心理学本体论:借鉴丹麦和俄罗斯的经验
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Dec;49(4):681-713. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9313-7.