• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索在预期触觉刺激期间潜在的社会因素对脑电位的影响。

Exploring potential social influences on brain potentials during anticipation of tactile stimulation.

作者信息

Shen Guannan, Saby Joni N, Drew Ashley R, Marshall Peter J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Temple University, Weiss Hall, 1801 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, USA.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2017 Mar 15;1659:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2017.01.022
PMID:28111163
Abstract

This study explored interpersonal influences on electrophysiological responses during the anticipation of tactile stimulation. It is well-known that broad, negative-going potentials are present in the event-related potential (ERP) between a forewarning cue and a tactile stimulus. It has also been shown that the alpha-range mu rhythm shows a lateralized desynchronization over central electrode sites during anticipation of tactile stimulation of the hand. The current study used a tactile discrimination task in which a visual cue signaled that an upcoming stimulus would either be delivered 1500ms later to the participant's hand, to a task partner's hand, or to neither person. For the condition in which participants anticipated the tactile stimulation to their own hand, a negative potential (contingent negative variation, CNV) was observed in the ERP at central sites in the 1000ms prior to the tactile stimulus. Significant mu rhythm desynchronization was also present in the same time window. The magnitudes of the ERPs and of the mu desynchronization were greater in the contralateral than in the ipsilateral hemisphere prior to right hand stimulation. Similar ERP and EEG changes were not present when the visual cue indicated that stimulation would be delivered to the task partner or to neither person. The absence of social influences during anticipation of tactile stimulation, and the relationship between the two brain signatures of anticipatory attention (CNV and mu rhythm) are discussed.

摘要

本研究探讨了在预期触觉刺激过程中人际因素对电生理反应的影响。众所周知,在预警提示与触觉刺激之间的事件相关电位(ERP)中存在广泛的负向电位。研究还表明,在预期对手部进行触觉刺激时,α频段的μ节律在中央电极部位会出现侧化去同步化。当前研究采用了一项触觉辨别任务,其中视觉提示表明即将到来的刺激将在1500毫秒后施加到参与者的手部、任务伙伴的手部,或者不施加给任何人。对于参与者预期自身手部会受到触觉刺激的情况,在触觉刺激前1000毫秒的中央部位ERP中观察到一个负向电位(关联性负变,CNV)。在同一时间窗口内也存在显著的μ节律去同步化。在右手刺激前,对侧半球的ERP和μ去同步化幅度大于同侧半球。当视觉提示表明刺激将施加给任务伙伴或不施加给任何人时,未出现类似的ERP和脑电图变化。本文讨论了在预期触觉刺激过程中社会影响的缺失,以及预期性注意的两种脑电特征(CNV和μ节律)之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Exploring potential social influences on brain potentials during anticipation of tactile stimulation.探索在预期触觉刺激期间潜在的社会因素对脑电位的影响。
Brain Res. 2017 Mar 15;1659:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.01.022. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
2
Individual differences in anticipatory mu rhythm modulation are associated with executive function and processing speed.个体在预期 mu 节律调制上的差异与执行功能和加工速度有关。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Oct;20(5):901-916. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00809-1.
3
Exploring developmental changes in infant anticipation and perceptual processing: EEG responses to tactile stimulation.探究婴儿预期和感知加工的发展变化:触觉刺激的 EEG 反应。
Infancy. 2022 Jan;27(1):97-114. doi: 10.1111/infa.12438. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
4
The effect of perceptual load on tactile spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.知觉负载对触觉空间注意的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Res. 2017 Oct 15;1673:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
5
Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.双手交叉会干扰触觉空间注意力,但不会干扰运动注意力:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(9):2303-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.034. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
6
Neural correlates of tactile perception during pre-, peri-, and post-movement.运动前、运动中和运动后触觉感知的神经关联。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 May;234(5):1293-305. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4589-5. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
7
Mirror-touch experiences in the infant brain.婴儿大脑中的镜像触摸体验。
Soc Neurosci. 2020 Dec;15(6):641-649. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2020.1840431. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
The attentive homunculus: ERP evidence for somatotopic allocation of attention in tactile search.专注小人:触觉搜索中注意力躯体感觉定位的事件相关电位证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Anticipation increases tactile stimulus processing in the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex.预期会增强同侧初级体感皮层中的触觉刺激处理。
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Oct;24(10):2562-71. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht111. Epub 2013 May 3.
10
Cue-locked lateralized components in a tactile spatial attention task: Evidence for a functional dissociation between ADAN and LSN.触觉空间注意任务中线索锁定的偏侧化成分:ADAN与LSN功能分离的证据
Psychophysiology. 2016 Apr;53(4):507-17. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12596. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Mirror visual feedback during unilateral finger movements is related to the desynchronization of cortical electroencephalographic somatomotor alpha rhythms.单侧手指运动时的镜像视觉反馈与皮质脑电图躯体运动α节律的失同步有关。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Dec;59(12):e14116. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14116. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Body representation in infants: Categorical boundaries of body parts as assessed by somatosensory mismatch negativity.婴儿的身体表象:通过躯体感觉失匹配负波评估的身体部位的类别边界。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Aug;44:100795. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100795. Epub 2020 May 11.
3
Sensorimotor Oscillations During a Reciprocal Touch Paradigm With a Human or Robot Partner.
与人类或机器人伙伴进行交互触摸范式时的感觉运动振荡
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 10;9:2280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02280. eCollection 2018.
4
Neural measures of anticipatory bodily attention in children: Relations with executive function.儿童预期身体注意的神经测量:与执行功能的关系。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Nov;34:148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
5
Touching lips and hearing fingers: effector-specific congruency between tactile and auditory stimulation modulates N1 amplitude and alpha desynchronization.唇间触碰与指上聆听:触觉与听觉刺激间的效应器特异性一致性调节N1波幅与α波去同步化。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jan;236(1):13-29. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5104-3. Epub 2017 Oct 16.