Reichel David, Morales Laura
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Vienna, Austria.
University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Comp Migr Stud. 2017;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40878-016-0044-9. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
This paper evaluates the sampling methods of an international survey, the Immigrant Citizens Survey, which aimed at surveying immigrants from outside the European Union (EU) in 15 cities in seven EU countries. In five countries, no sample frame was available for the target population. Consequently, alternative ways to obtain a representative sample had to be found. In three countries 'location sampling' was employed, while in two countries traditional methods were used with adaptations to reach the target population. The paper assesses the main methodological challenges of carrying out a survey among a group of immigrants for whom no sampling frame exists. The samples of the survey in these five countries are compared to results of official statistics in order to assess the accuracy of the samples obtained through the different sampling methods. It can be shown that alternative sampling methods can provide meaningful results in terms of core demographic characteristics although some estimates differ to some extent from the census results.
本文评估了一项国际调查——移民公民调查的抽样方法。该调查旨在对欧盟七个国家15个城市中的非欧盟移民进行调查。在五个国家中,没有针对目标人群的抽样框。因此,必须找到获取代表性样本的替代方法。在三个国家采用了“地点抽样”,而在两个国家则使用了经过调整的传统方法来接触目标人群。本文评估了在没有抽样框的移民群体中开展调查所面临的主要方法挑战。将这五个国家的调查样本与官方统计结果进行比较,以评估通过不同抽样方法获得的样本的准确性。结果表明,尽管一些估计值与人口普查结果在一定程度上有所不同,但替代抽样方法在核心人口特征方面能够提供有意义的结果。