Careja Romana, Andreß Hans-Jürgen
1Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark.
2Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0103-5. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
When it comes to evaluating immigrants' integration, survey data are particularly important. However, the endeavor of surveying immigrant minorities is challenging. This special issue focuses on the possibility of obtaining high-quality cross-country comparable samples of immigrant minorities. As the golden standard for drawing random representative samples are the population lists, the contributions of the special issue have directed their attention to this sampling frame. In the three country-based articles, the authors are discussing the legal, administrative and scholarly challenges and opportunities for using population registers as sampling frames for immigrant minorities. The fourth article summarize their findings and concludes that identical register-based sampling design is difficult to implement in a cross-country design, due to the significant differences in the quality of population registers and their accessibility to researchers. The authors suggest that by sampling immigrant minorities in cities, researchers can better implement sampling strategies which result in comparable samples.
在评估移民融入情况时,调查数据尤为重要。然而,对少数族裔移民进行调查的工作颇具挑战性。本期特刊聚焦于获取高质量的、可在不同国家间进行比较的少数族裔移民样本的可能性。由于抽取随机代表性样本的黄金标准是人口名单,本期特刊的文章将关注点投向了这个抽样框架。在三篇基于国家的文章中,作者们探讨了将人口登记册用作少数族裔移民抽样框架所面临的法律、行政和学术方面的挑战与机遇。第四篇文章总结了他们的研究结果,并得出结论:由于人口登记册的质量及其对研究人员的可获取性存在显著差异,基于登记册的相同抽样设计在跨国设计中难以实施。作者们建议,通过在城市中对少数族裔移民进行抽样,研究人员能够更好地实施抽样策略,从而得到具有可比性的样本。