Suppr超能文献

氯诺昔康与低剂量曲马多用于甲状腺切除术后疼痛管理的比较。

Comparison of lornoxicam and low-dose tramadol for management of post-thyroidectomy pain.

作者信息

Yücel Ali, Yazıcı Alper, Müderris Togay, Gül Fatih

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Bozüyük State Hospital, Bilecik, Turkey.

出版信息

Agri. 2016 Oct;28(4):183-189. doi: 10.5505/agri.2016.94546.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present study sought to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intravenous (IV) lornoxicam and tramadol to investigate if lornoxicam is a reasonable alternative to a weak opioid for post-thyroidectomy pain.

METHODS

Fifty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II, 18 to 65 years of age, and who underwent thyroidectomy were assigned to 2 groups in a randomized manner. Group L received 8 mg of lornoxicam IV and Group T received 1 mg/kg of tramadol IV at conclusion of the operation. Pain intensity of patients was recorded at 15 and 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the initial dose with Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Ramsey Sedation Scale. Electrocardiogram, heart rate, systolic/diastolic and average artery pressure and peripheral oxygen saturations were monitored continuously during this period. Patients completed satisfaction questionnaires at 24th hour.

RESULTS

Both drugs produced acceptable analgesia; however, significantly fewer patients reported 1 or more adverse events with lornoxicam than with tramadol. Most commonly seen in Group T was nausea/vomiting. NRS scores at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 1 hour were lower in Group L than in Group T (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups after postoperative first hour. First analgesic requirement time was significantly longer in Group L compared to Group T (p<0.001). No serious complications were seen in either group.

CONCLUSION

Lornoxicam is a safe and effective analgesic that may be used with fewer complications than low-dose tramadol for treatment of moderate to severe postoperative pain.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较静脉注射氯诺昔康和曲马多的镇痛效果及不良反应,以探讨氯诺昔康是否可作为弱阿片类药物用于甲状腺切除术后疼痛的合理替代药物。

方法

将50例年龄在18至65岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级为I或II级且接受甲状腺切除术的患者随机分为两组。L组在手术结束时静脉注射8mg氯诺昔康,T组静脉注射1mg/kg曲马多。在初始剂量后的15分钟、30分钟以及1、2、3、4、6、12和24小时,使用数字评分量表(NRS)和拉姆齐镇静量表记录患者的疼痛强度。在此期间持续监测心电图、心率、收缩压/舒张压、平均动脉压和外周血氧饱和度。患者在第24小时完成满意度问卷调查。

结果

两种药物均产生了可接受的镇痛效果;然而,与曲马多相比,报告有1种或更多不良反应的氯诺昔康患者明显更少。T组最常见的是恶心/呕吐。L组在15分钟、30分钟和1小时时的NRS评分低于T组(p<0.05),但术后第一小时后两组之间无显著差异。L组的首次镇痛需求时间明显长于T组(p<0.001)。两组均未出现严重并发症。

结论

氯诺昔康是一种安全有效的镇痛药,用于治疗中度至重度术后疼痛时,其并发症可能比低剂量曲马多更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验