Simpson Thomas
Gonville and Caius College, University of Cambridge, UK.
Hist Sci. 2017 Mar;55(1):3-36. doi: 10.1177/0073275316686580. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
During the second half of the nineteenth century, land frontiers became areas of unique significance for surveyors in colonial India. These regions were understood to provide the most stringent tests for the men, instruments, and techniques that collectively constituted spatial data and representations. In many instances, however, the severity of the challenges that India's frontiers afforded stretched practices in the field and in the survey office beyond breaking point. Far from producing supposedly unequivocal maps, many involved in frontier surveying acknowledged that their work was problematic, partial, and prone to contrary readings. They increasingly came to construe frontiers as spaces that exceeded scientific understanding, and resorted to descriptions that emphasized fantastical and disorienting embodied experiences. Through examining the many crises and multiple agents of frontier mapping in British India, this article argues that colonial surveying and its outputs were less assured and more convoluted than previous histories have acknowledged.
在19世纪下半叶,陆地边界对英属印度殖民地的测量员来说具有独特的重要意义。这些地区被认为是对构成空间数据和表征的人员、仪器和技术进行最严格测试的地方。然而,在许多情况下,印度边境带来的挑战之严峻,使得实地和测量办公室的工作超出了极限。参与边境测量的许多人远未绘制出所谓明确无误的地图,他们承认自己的工作存在问题、不完整,而且容易产生相反的解读。他们越来越将边境视为超出科学理解范围的空间,并诉诸于强调奇幻和令人迷失方向的具体体验的描述。通过审视英属印度边境测绘中的诸多危机和众多参与者,本文认为,殖民测绘及其成果比以往历史所承认的更不确定、更复杂。