Nygren-Bonnier Malin, Schiffer Tomas A, Lindholm Peter
a Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, and Functional Area Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Allied Health Professionals Function , Karolinska University Hospital , Huddinge , Sweden.
b Department of Physiology and Pharmacology , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Jan;41(1):85-90. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1275446. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
To evaluate acute effects of glossopharyngeal insufflation (GI) on lung function, airway pressure (P), blood pressure and heart rate (HR) in people with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI).
Case-control design.
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ten participants with CSCI suffering from lesions between C4 and C8, and ASIA classification of A or B were recruited. Ten healthy particpants familiar with GI were recruited as a reference group.
Spirometry, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), P and HR were measured in a sitting and a supine position before, during, and after GI.
GI in the study group in a sitting position increased total lung capacity (TLC) by 712 ml: P < 0.001, vital capacity (VC) by 587 ml: P < 0.0001, P by 13 cm HO: P < 0.01, and HR by 10 beats/min: P < 0.001. MAP decreased by 25 mmHg, P < 0.0001. Significant differences were observed between groups comparing baseline with GI. The reference group had a higher increase in; TLC (P < 0.01), VC (P < 0.001), P (P < 0.001) and HR (P < 0.05) and a higher decrease in MAP (P < 0.001). With GI in a sitting compared to a supine position, TLC, MAP, HR, P remained unchanged in the study group, while residual volume decreased in the supine position (P < 0.01).
There was a difference between the groups in the increase in TLC; VC; P HR and in the decrease in MAP with GI, however MAP, HR and P responded in similar way in both groups in a sitting as well as a supine position. If performed correctly, the risks of GI resulting in clinically significant hemodynamic changes is low, although syncope may still occur.
评估舌咽吹气(GI)对颈脊髓损伤(CSCI)患者肺功能、气道压力(P)、血压和心率(HR)的急性影响。
病例对照设计。
瑞典斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡学院。
招募了10名颈脊髓损伤患者,损伤部位在C4至C8之间,美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级为A或B级。招募了10名熟悉舌咽吹气的健康参与者作为对照组。
在舌咽吹气前、吹气期间和吹气后,分别测量坐位和平卧位的肺活量、平均动脉血压(MAP)、气道压力(P)和心率(HR)。
研究组坐位进行舌咽吹气时,肺总量(TLC)增加712ml,P<0.001;肺活量(VC)增加587ml,P<0.0001;气道压力(P)增加13cmH₂O,P<0.01;心率(HR)增加10次/分钟,P<0.001。平均动脉血压(MAP)下降25mmHg,P<0.0001。比较两组基线值与舌咽吹气后的结果,发现存在显著差异。对照组的肺总量(TLC)、肺活量(VC)、气道压力(P)和心率(HR)升高幅度更大(P<0.01、P<0.001、P<0.001和P<0.05),平均动脉血压(MAP)下降幅度更大(P<0.001)。与平卧位相比,研究组坐位进行舌咽吹气时,肺总量(TLC)、平均动脉血压(MAP)、心率(HR)、气道压力(P)保持不变,而残气量在平卧位时减少(P<0.01)。
两组在舌咽吹气时肺总量(TLC)、肺活量(VC)、气道压力(P)、心率(HR)升高以及平均动脉血压(MAP)下降方面存在差异,然而,坐位和平卧位时两组的平均动脉血压(MAP)、心率(HR)和气道压力(P)反应相似。如果操作正确,舌咽吹气导致临床上显著血流动力学变化的风险较低,尽管仍可能发生晕厥。