• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科围手术期协议在急性高危腹部手术患者中的应用。

Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery.

机构信息

Gastro Unit Surgical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2017 Mar;104(4):463-471. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10427. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.10427
PMID:28112798
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery carries a very high risk of morbidity and mortality and represents a massive healthcare burden. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a standardized multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing AHA surgery.

METHODS

The AHA study was a prospective single-centre controlled study in consecutive patients undergoing AHA surgery, defined as major abdominal pathology requiring emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy including reoperations after elective gastrointestinal surgery. Consecutive patients were included after initiation of the AHA protocol as standard care. The intervention cohort was compared with a predefined, consecutive historical cohort of patients from the same department. The protocol involved continuous staff education, consultant-led attention and care, early resuscitation and high-dose antibiotics, surgery within 6 h, perioperative stroke volume-guided haemodynamic optimization, intermediate level of care for the first 24 h after surgery, standardized analgesic treatment, early postoperative ambulation and early enteral nutrition. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Six hundred patients were included in the study and compared with 600 historical controls. The unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was 21·8 per cent in the control cohort compared with 15·5 per cent in the intervention cohort (P = 0·005). The 180-day mortality rates were 29·5 and 22·2 per cent respectively (P = 0·004).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a multidisciplinary perioperative protocol was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative mortality in patients undergoing AHA surgery. NCT01899885 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

背景

急性高危腹部(AHA)手术具有很高的发病率和死亡率,是医疗保健的巨大负担。本研究旨在评估对接受 AHA 手术的患者实施标准化多学科围手术期方案的效果。

方法

AHA 研究是一项前瞻性单中心对照研究,连续纳入接受 AHA 手术的患者,定义为需要紧急剖腹手术或腹腔镜检查的主要腹部病变,包括胃肠手术的再次手术。在启动 AHA 方案作为标准护理后,连续纳入患者。干预组与来自同一科室的预先确定的连续历史队列的患者进行比较。该方案涉及持续的员工教育、顾问主导的关注和护理、早期复苏和大剂量抗生素、6 小时内手术、围手术期以每搏量为导向的血流动力学优化、手术后前 24 小时的中级护理、标准化镇痛治疗、早期术后活动和早期肠内营养。主要结局是 30 天死亡率。

结果

该研究纳入了 600 例患者,并与 600 例历史对照进行了比较。对照组的 30 天未调整死亡率为 21.8%,而干预组为 15.5%(P=0.005)。180 天死亡率分别为 29.5%和 22.2%(P=0.004)。

结论

在接受 AHA 手术的患者中,引入多学科围手术期方案与术后死亡率的显著降低相关。NCT01899885(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery.多学科围手术期协议在急性高危腹部手术患者中的应用。
Br J Surg. 2017 Mar;104(4):463-471. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10427. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
2
Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation.多中心试验:围手术期方案减少消化性溃疡穿孔患者死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2011 Jun;98(6):802-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7429. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
3
Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery.护理标准化:强化康复方案对结直肠手术后住院时间、并发症及直接费用的影响
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):430-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.042. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
4
Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后强化康复与标准护理的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):482-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9026. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
5
Perioperative treatment of patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery
.急性高风险腹部手术患者的围手术期治疗
Dan Med J. 2018 Feb;65(2).
6
Mininvasive abdominal aortic surgery. Early recovery and reduced hospitalization after multidisciplinary approach.微创腹主动脉手术。多学科方法后的早期恢复及住院时间缩短。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2003 Oct;44(5):629-35.
7
[Mortality rate after acute laparotomy can be reduced].急性剖腹手术后的死亡率可以降低。
Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Jul 30;180(31).
8
Sustained improved emergency laparotomy outcomes over 3 years after a transdisciplinary perioperative care pathway-A 1:1 propensity score matched study.跨学科围手术期护理路径实施 3 年后,急诊剖腹手术结局持续改善:1:1 倾向评分匹配研究。
Surgery. 2024 Sep;176(3):849-856. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
9
Clinical benefits after the implementation of a multimodal perioperative protocol in elderly patients.老年患者实施多模式围手术期方案后的临床获益
Arq Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr-Jun;47(2):178-83. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032010000200012.
10
Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection.患者术后转归和医护人员认知在实施开腹肝切除围手术期标准化护理路径后的变化。
Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):564-71. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10087. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The AI and Automation in Anaesthesia (TRIPLE-A) Perioperative Database in Eastern Denmark 2017-: A Platform for Epidemiology, AI-Driven Prediction, Quality Control and Automated Data Retrieval.丹麦东部麻醉领域的人工智能与自动化(TRIPLE - A)围手术期数据库(2017年至今):一个用于流行病学、人工智能驱动预测、质量控制和自动数据检索的平台。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Oct;69(9):e70116. doi: 10.1111/aas.70116.
2
Retrospective cohort study of perioperative factors and outcomes in emergency laparotomy in Palestine.巴勒斯坦急诊剖腹手术围手术期因素与结局的回顾性队列研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03125-y.
3
Surgeons' prioritization of emergency abdominal surgery and its impact on postoperative outcomes.
外科医生对急诊腹部手术的优先级排序及其对术后结果的影响。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 May 7;410(1):153. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03723-7.
4
Enhanced rehabilitation after surgery: principles in the treatment of emergency complicated colorectal cancers - a narrative review.术后强化康复:急诊复杂性结直肠癌治疗原则——叙述性综述
J Med Life. 2025 Mar;18(3):179-187. doi: 10.25122/jml-2025-0049.
5
Trends in Clinical Outcomes After Major Emergency Abdominal Surgery in Denmark, Data From 2002-2022.丹麦重大急诊腹部手术后临床结局的趋势,2002年至2022年的数据。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0858.
6
Impact of a transition of care bundle on health-related quality of life after major emergency abdominal surgery: before-and-after study.重大腹部急诊手术后护理包过渡对健康相关生活质量的影响:前后对照研究。
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf020.
7
Key interventions and outcomes in perioperative care pathways in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.急诊剖腹手术围手术期护理路径中的关键干预措施及结果:一项系统评价
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 10;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00597-4.
8
High risk of short-term mortality and postoperative complications in patients with generalized peritonitis undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery-a cohort study.一项队列研究:接受重大急诊腹部手术的弥漫性腹膜炎患者短期死亡和术后并发症的高风险
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Feb 11;410(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03637-4.
9
Impact of routine pre-operative risk assessment on patients undergoing emergency major abdominal surgery in a regional Victorian hospital.常规术前风险评估对维多利亚州一家地区医院接受急诊重大腹部手术患者的影响。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Dec;94(12):2238-2244. doi: 10.1111/ans.19260. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
10
Outcomes of patients admitted with malignant small bowel obstruction: a subgroup multicentre observational cohort analysis.以恶性小肠梗阻入院患者的结局:亚组多中心观察队列分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 6;409(1):239. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03436-3.