Georgiannos Dimitrios, Bisbinas Ilias
424 Military General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Hellas.
Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1388-1394. doi: 10.1177/0363546516682498. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
Open surgical excision of the os trigonum has been the traditional treatment for posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS). However, the endoscopic excision has recently become quite popular. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of our study was to compare the results of endoscopic versus open excision of a symptomatic os trigonum for the treatment of PAIS in an athletic population. It was hypothesized that the endoscopic technique would be superior to the open technique regarding functional outcomes, pain, and time to return to training and the previous sports level.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
From 2008 to 2011, 52 athletes underwent a symptomatic os trigonum excision; 26 athletes had an open procedure (group A) and 26 had an endoscopic procedure (group B). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score and the Visual Analog Score-Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) were obtained, and the time to return to training and to previous sports level was recorded.
Patients in group B appeared to have significant improvement of AOFAS hindfoot score compared with those in group A ( P < .05), whereas no statistical significance was found for the postoperative VAS-FA scores between the 2 groups. The mean ± SD time to return to training was 9.58 ± 3.98 weeks for group A and 4.58 ± 1.47 weeks for group B ( P < .001). The time to return to previous sports level was 11.54 ± 3.89 weeks for group A and 7.12 ± 2.25 weeks for group B ( P < .001). The overall complication rate was 23% for group A (6 cases) and 3.8% for group B (1 case).
Both the open procedure and the endoscopic approach yielded acceptable outcomes in terms of function and pain. However, complication rates were remarkably lower with endoscopic treatment, and the time to return to full activities was much shorter. Endoscopic excision of the os trigonum is a safe and effective treatment option for athletes who require early return to their previous sports level.
距骨三角骨开放性手术切除一直是后踝撞击综合征(PAIS)的传统治疗方法。然而,内镜下切除近来已变得相当流行。目的/假设:我们研究的目的是比较有症状的距骨三角骨内镜下切除与开放性切除治疗运动员PAIS的结果。假设在内镜技术在功能结果、疼痛以及恢复训练和之前运动水平的时间方面优于开放技术。
随机对照试验;证据等级,2级。
2008年至2011年,52名运动员接受了有症状的距骨三角骨切除;26名运动员接受开放性手术(A组),26名接受内镜手术(B组)。获取美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)后足评分和视觉模拟评分-足踝(VAS-FA),并记录恢复训练和之前运动水平的时间。
与A组相比,B组患者的AOFAS后足评分有显著改善(P < 0.05),而两组术后VAS-FA评分无统计学差异。A组恢复训练的平均±标准差时间为9.58±3.98周,B组为4.58±1.47周(P < 0.001)。A组恢复到之前运动水平的时间为11.54±3.89周,B组为7.12±2.25周(P < 0.001)。A组的总体并发症发生率为23%(6例),B组为3.8%(1例)。
开放性手术和内镜手术在功能和疼痛方面均产生了可接受的结果。然而,内镜治疗的并发症发生率明显更低,且恢复完全活动的时间要短得多。距骨三角骨内镜下切除对于需要尽早恢复到之前运动水平的运动员来说是一种安全有效的治疗选择。