Suppr超能文献

一项比较阴道脱垂手术后立即拔除导管与延迟拔除导管的随机对照试验。

A randomised controlled trial comparing immediate versus delayed catheter removal following vaginal prolapse surgery.

作者信息

Bray Rhiannon, Cartwright Rufus, Digesu Alex, Fernando Ruwan, Khullar Vik

机构信息

Department of Urogynaecology, St Marys Hospital, Imperial NHS Trust, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:314-318. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It is unclear if any catheterisation is necessary after vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. The aim of this study was to determine if indwelling catheterisation is necessary after these procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomised controlled trial of immediate post-operative removal of catheter compared to a suprapubic catheter (SPC) after vaginal prolapse surgery. In the Suprapubic group the catheter was left on free drainage until a voiding trial was commenced at 48h. Women in the immediate removal group underwent in/out catheterisation only if they had not voided by 8h after surgery to ensure the bladder did not over-distend.

RESULTS

55% (n=17) of patients in the immediate removal group did not require catheterisation postoperatively. A further 13 (42%) patients only required one in/out catheterisation 8h post operatively. In the immediate removal group duration of catheterisation was significantly shorter (median 0h, IQR 0-8h, range 0-16h) vs (6days (IQR 2-8days, range 2-19h) p=0.001). The duration of hospital stay (7days (range 3-16) vs. 9 (range 3-27) p=0.014), day of first mobilisation (Day 1, range 0-2, vs. Day 2, range 1-4, p=0.001), and rate of Symptomatic bacturia (16% vs. 52%, p<0.01) were all significantly better with immediate catheter removal.

CONCLUSIONS

After vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, the majority of patients do not require extended catheterisation. Early removal of a catheter reduces urinary tract infection and significantly decreases hospital stay. Such a policy should result in improved patient satisfaction and reduced hospital costs.

摘要

目的

盆腔器官脱垂阴道手术后是否有必要进行任何导尿尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定这些手术后留置导尿是否必要。

研究设计

一项关于阴道脱垂手术后立即拔除导尿管与耻骨上导尿管(SPC)对比的随机对照试验。在耻骨上导尿组,导尿管保持自由引流,直到48小时开始进行排尿试验。立即拔除导尿管组的女性只有在术后8小时仍未排尿时才进行间歇性导尿,以确保膀胱不过度扩张。

结果

立即拔除导尿管组中55%(n = 17)的患者术后不需要导尿。另有13名(42%)患者仅在术后8小时需要进行一次间歇性导尿。立即拔除导尿管组的导尿持续时间明显更短(中位数0小时,四分位数间距0 - 8小时,范围0 - 16小时),而耻骨上导尿组为6天(四分位数间距2 - 8天,范围2 - 19小时),p = 0.001。立即拔除导尿管组的住院时间(7天(范围3 - 16天)对9天(范围3 - 27天),p = 0.014)、首次活动日期(第1天,范围0 - 2天,对第2天,范围1 - 4天,p = 0.001)以及有症状菌尿发生率(16%对52%,p < 0.01)均明显更好。

结论

盆腔器官脱垂阴道手术后,大多数患者不需要长时间导尿。早期拔除导尿管可降低尿路感染并显著缩短住院时间。这样的政策应能提高患者满意度并降低医院成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验