用于识别感染患者中脓毒症的快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA） - Suppr

qSOFA for Identifying Sepsis Among Patients With Infection.

作者信息

Lamontagne François, Harrison David A, Rowan Kathryn M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada2Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.

Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):267-268. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19684.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.19684

PMID:28114531

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

qSOFA for Identifying Sepsis Among Patients With Infection.用于识别感染患者中脓毒症的快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）

JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):267-268. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19684.

Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。

Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.

Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身炎症反应综合征对急诊科脓毒症的预测比较。

J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;35(4):649. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.12.042. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.

Lactate ≥2 mmol/L plus qSOFA improves utility over qSOFA alone in emergency department patients presenting with suspected sepsis.对于疑似脓毒症的急诊科患者，乳酸水平≥2 mmol/L 加上快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）比单独使用qSOFA更具实用性。

Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Dec;29(6):626-634. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12894.

Assessment of mortality by qSOFA in patients with sepsis outside ICU: A post hoc subgroup analysis by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Sepsis Registry Study Group.非重症监护病房脓毒症患者中采用qSOFA评估死亡率：日本急性医学协会脓毒症注册研究组的事后亚组分析

J Infect Chemother. 2017 Nov;23(11):757-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

Performance of the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分在重症监护室外感染患者中的预后工具性能：系统评价和荟萃分析。

Crit Care. 2018 Feb 6;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1952-x.

qSOFA Has Poor Sensitivity for Prehospital Identification of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.qSOFA对院前严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的识别敏感性较差。

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):489-497. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1274348. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

Predictive value of the CURB-65, qSOFA, and APACHE II for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute exacerbation chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.CURB-65、qSOFA 和 APACHE II 评分对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者住院病死率的预测价值。

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 11;103(41):e40022. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040022.

Assessment of soluble thrombomodulin and soluble endoglin as endothelial dysfunction biomarkers in seriously ill surgical septic patients: correlation with organ dysfunction and disease severity.评估严重外科脓毒症患者内皮功能障碍的可溶性血栓调节蛋白和可溶性内皮糖蛋白标志物：与器官功能障碍和疾病严重程度的相关性。

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):897-904. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02369-8. Epub 2023 Sep 23.

Comparing In-Hospital Mortality Prediction by Senior Emergency Resident's Judgment and Prognostic Models in the Emergency Department.比较急诊科资深住院医师判断和预后模型对住院患者死亡率的预测。

Biomed Res Int. 2023 May 15;2023:6042762. doi: 10.1155/2023/6042762. eCollection 2023.

Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores.脓毒症的临床和微生物学特征及脓毒症评分评估。

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247646. eCollection 2021.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility Compared Among Different Sepsis Scoring Systems in Adult Patients With Sepsis in Thailand: A Prospective Cohort Study.泰国成年脓毒症患者中不同脓毒症评分系统的诊断和预后效用比较：一项前瞻性队列研究

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 26;8(1):ofaa573. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa573. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Prognostic accuracy of SIRS criteria and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among influenza patients in the emergency department.急诊流感患者中 SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对院内死亡率的预后准确性。

BMC Infect Dis. 2020 May 29;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05102-7.

Prospective Observational Study Comparing Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions in Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Patients.比较脓毒症-2和脓毒症-3定义对危重症患者死亡率预测价值的前瞻性观察性研究。

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 5;6(7):ofz271. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz271. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Sepsis: evolving concepts and challenges.脓毒症：不断演变的概念与挑战

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2019;52(4):e8595. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20198595. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

An electronic warning system helps reduce the time to diagnosis of sepsis.电子预警系统有助于缩短脓毒症的诊断时间。

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):414-422. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180059. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Contribution of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Combined with Electrocardiography in Risk Stratification of Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分联合心电图在急性肺栓塞患者风险分层中的作用。

Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Oct 20;131(20):2395-2401. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.243566.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

qSOFA for Identifying Sepsis Among Patients With Infection.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

文件翻译

深度研究

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献