Department of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Medical Center, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 May 29;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05102-7.
The seasonal influenza epidemic is an important public health issue worldwide. Early predictive identification of patients with potentially worse outcome is important in the emergency department (ED). Similarly as with bacterial infection, influenza can cause sepsis. This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score as prognostic predictors for ED patients with influenza.
This single-center, retrospective cohort study investigated data that was retrieved from a hospital-based research database. Adult ED patients (age ≥ 18 at admission) with laboratory-proven influenza from 2010 to 2016 were included for data analysis. The initial SIRS and qSOFA scores were both collected. The primary outcome was the utility of each score in the prediction of in-hospital mortality.
For the study period, 3561 patients met the study inclusion criteria. The overall in-hospital mortality was 2.7% (95 patients). When the qSOFA scores were 0, 1, 2, and 3, the percentages of in-hospital mortality were 0.6, 7.2, 15.9, and 25%, respectively. Accordingly, the odds ratios (ORs) were 7.72, 11.92, and 22.46, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity was 24 and 96.2%, respectively, when the qSOFA score was ≥2. However, the SIRS criteria showed no significant associations with the primary outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.864, which is significantly higher than that with SIRS, where the AUC was 0.786 (P < 0.01).
The qSOFA score potentially is a useful prognostic predictor for influenza and could be applied in the ED as a risk stratification tool. However, qSOFA may not be a good screening tool for triage because of its poor sensitivity. The SIRS criteria showed poor predictive performance in influenza for mortality as an outcome. Further research is needed to determine the role of these predictive tools in influenza and in other viral infections.
季节性流感疫情是全球重要的公共卫生问题。在急诊科(ED)中,尽早预测可能预后较差的患者非常重要。与细菌感染一样,流感也可能导致败血症。本研究旨在探讨全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准和快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分作为流感 ED 患者预后预测指标的有效性。
这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,从医院的研究数据库中检索数据。纳入了 2010 年至 2016 年实验室确诊流感的成年 ED 患者(入院时年龄≥18 岁)进行数据分析。收集了初始 SIRS 和 qSOFA 评分。主要结局是各评分预测院内死亡率的效用。
在研究期间,3561 名患者符合研究纳入标准。总的院内死亡率为 2.7%(95 名患者)。当 qSOFA 评分为 0、1、2 和 3 时,院内死亡率分别为 0.6%、7.2%、15.9%和 25%。相应的比值比(OR)分别为 7.72、11.92 和 22.46。当 qSOFA 评分≥2 时,敏感性和特异性分别为 24%和 96.2%。然而,SIRS 标准与主要结局无显著相关性。受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.864,明显高于 SIRS 的 0.786(P<0.01)。
qSOFA 评分可能是流感的一种有用的预后预测指标,可作为 ED 中的风险分层工具。然而,qSOFA 可能不是一种很好的分诊筛查工具,因为其敏感性较差。SIRS 标准在预测流感死亡率方面的预测性能较差。需要进一步研究以确定这些预测工具在流感和其他病毒感染中的作用。