Suppr超能文献

成人医师诊断哮喘的再评估。

Reevaluation of Diagnosis in Adults With Physician-Diagnosed Asthma.

机构信息

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):269-279. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19627.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Although asthma is a chronic disease, the expected rate of spontaneous remissions of adult asthma and the stability of diagnosis are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a diagnosis of current asthma could be ruled out and asthma medications safely stopped in randomly selected adults with physician-diagnosed asthma.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted in 10 Canadian cities from January 2012 to February 2016. Random digit dialing was used to recruit adult participants who reported a history of physician-diagnosed asthma established within the past 5 years. Participants using long-term oral steroids and participants unable to be tested using spirometry were excluded. Information from the diagnosing physician was obtained to determine how the diagnosis of asthma was originally made in the community. Of 1026 potential participants who fulfilled eligibility criteria during telephone screening, 701 (68.3%) agreed to enter into the study. All participants were assessed with home peak flow and symptom monitoring, spirometry, and serial bronchial challenge tests, and those participants using daily asthma medications had their medications gradually tapered off over 4 study visits. Participants in whom a diagnosis of current asthma was ultimately ruled out were followed up clinically with repeated bronchial challenge tests over 1 year.

EXPOSURE

Physician-diagnosed asthma established within the past 5 years.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of participants in whom a diagnosis of current asthma was ruled out, defined as participants who exhibited no evidence of acute worsening of asthma symptoms, reversible airflow obstruction, or bronchial hyperresponsiveness after having all asthma medications tapered off and after a study pulmonologist established an alternative diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included the proportion with asthma ruled out after 12 months and the proportion who underwent an appropriate initial diagnostic workup for asthma in the community.

RESULTS

Of 701 participants (mean [SD] age, 51 [16] years; 467 women [67%]), 613 completed the study and could be conclusively evaluated for a diagnosis of current asthma. Current asthma was ruled out in 203 of 613 study participants (33.1%; 95% CI, 29.4%-36.8%). Twelve participants (2.0%) were found to have serious cardiorespiratory conditions that had been previously misdiagnosed as asthma in the community. After an additional 12 months of follow-up, 181 participants (29.5%; 95% CI, 25.9%-33.1%) continued to exhibit no clinical or laboratory evidence of asthma. Participants in whom current asthma was ruled out, compared with those in whom it was confirmed, were less likely to have undergone testing for airflow limitation in the community at the time of initial diagnosis (43.8% vs 55.6%, respectively; absolute difference, 11.8%; 95% CI, 2.1%-21.5%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among adults with physician-diagnosed asthma, a current diagnosis of asthma could not be established in 33.1% who were not using daily asthma medications or had medications weaned. In patients such as these, reassessing the asthma diagnosis may be warranted.

摘要

重要性

尽管哮喘是一种慢性疾病,但成人哮喘的自发缓解率以及诊断的稳定性尚不清楚。

目的

确定在随机选择的、经医生诊断患有哮喘的成年人中,是否可以排除当前哮喘的诊断,并安全停用哮喘药物。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项前瞻性、多中心队列研究,于 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 2 月在加拿大的 10 个城市进行。采用随机数字拨号的方式招募报告在过去 5 年内曾被医生诊断患有哮喘的成年参与者。排除长期使用口服类固醇和无法进行肺功能检查的参与者。从诊断医生那里获取信息,以确定最初在社区中是如何做出哮喘诊断的。在电话筛查中符合入选标准的 1026 名潜在参与者中,有 701 名(68.3%)同意进入研究。所有参与者均接受家庭峰流速和症状监测、肺功能检查和系列支气管激发试验,那些使用每日哮喘药物的参与者在 4 次研究就诊期间逐渐减少药物剂量。最终被排除当前哮喘诊断的参与者在 1 年内通过重复支气管激发试验进行临床随访。

暴露情况

在过去 5 年内被医生诊断为哮喘。

主要结果和测量指标

主要结局是排除当前哮喘诊断的参与者比例,定义为所有哮喘药物逐渐减量后,以及在研究肺科医生确定替代诊断后,表现出无哮喘症状急性恶化、可逆转的气流受限或支气管高反应性的参与者比例。次要结局包括 12 个月后排除哮喘的比例以及社区中适当的初始哮喘诊断检查的比例。

结果

在 701 名参与者(平均[SD]年龄,51[16]岁;467 名女性[67%])中,有 613 名完成了研究,可以明确评估当前哮喘的诊断。在 613 名研究参与者中,有 203 名(33.1%;95%CI,29.4%-36.8%)被排除当前哮喘诊断。有 12 名参与者(2.0%)被发现患有严重的心肺疾病,这些疾病在社区中曾被误诊为哮喘。在额外的 12 个月随访中,181 名参与者(29.5%;95%CI,25.9%-33.1%)继续表现出无哮喘的临床或实验室证据。与确诊为哮喘的参与者相比,被排除当前哮喘诊断的参与者在初始诊断时接受气流受限检查的可能性更低(分别为 43.8%和 55.6%;绝对差异,11.8%;95%CI,2.1%-21.5%)。

结论和相关性

在未经药物治疗或已减药的经医生诊断患有哮喘的成年人中,有 33.1%的人不能确诊为当前哮喘。在这些患者中,可能需要重新评估哮喘的诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验