Suppr超能文献

通过共同因素反馈增强心理治疗过程:一项随机临床试验。

Enhancing psychotherapy process with common factors feedback: A randomized, clinical trial.

作者信息

McClintock Andrew S, Perlman Matthew R, McCarrick Shannon M, Anderson Timothy, Himawan Lina

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio University.

出版信息

J Couns Psychol. 2017 Apr;64(3):247-260. doi: 10.1037/cou0000188. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In this study, we developed and tested a common factors feedback (CFF) system. The CFF system was designed to provide ongoing feedback to clients and therapists about client ratings of three common factors: (a) outcome expectations, (b) empathy, and (c) the therapeutic alliance. We evaluated the CFF system using randomized, clinical trial (RCT) methodology.

PARTICIPANTS

Clients were 79 undergraduates who reported mild, moderate, or severe depressive symptoms at screening and pretreatment assessments. These clients were randomized to either: (a) treatment as usual (TAU) or (b) treatment as usual plus the CFF system (TAU + CFF). Both conditions entailed 5 weekly sessions of evidence-based therapy delivered by doctoral students in clinical psychology. Clients completed measures of common factors (i.e., outcome expectations, empathy, therapeutic alliance) and outcome at each session. Clients and therapists in TAU + CFF received feedback on client ratings of common factors at the beginning of Sessions 2 through 5. When surveyed, clients and therapists indicated that that they were satisfied with the CFF system and found it useful. Multilevel modeling revealed that TAU + CFF clients reported larger gains in perceived empathy and alliance over the course of treatment compared with TAU clients. No between-groups effects were found for outcome expectations or treatment outcome. These results imply that our CFF system was well received and has the potential to improve therapy process for clients with depressive symptoms. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

未标注

在本研究中,我们开发并测试了一种共同因素反馈(CFF)系统。CFF系统旨在就客户对三个共同因素的评分向客户和治疗师提供持续反馈:(a)结果期望,(b)同理心,以及(c)治疗联盟。我们使用随机临床试验(RCT)方法对CFF系统进行了评估。

参与者

客户为79名本科生,他们在筛查和预处理评估中报告有轻度、中度或重度抑郁症状。这些客户被随机分为:(a)常规治疗(TAU)或(b)常规治疗加CFF系统(TAU + CFF)。两种情况都包括由临床心理学博士生进行的为期5周的循证治疗。客户在每次治疗时完成共同因素(即结果期望、同理心、治疗联盟)和治疗结果的测量。TAU + CFF组的客户和治疗师在第2至5次治疗开始时收到关于客户对共同因素评分的反馈。在接受调查时,客户和治疗师表示他们对CFF系统满意并认为其有用。多层次建模显示,与TAU组客户相比,TAU + CFF组客户在治疗过程中报告在感知同理心和联盟方面有更大的改善。在结果期望或治疗结果方面未发现组间效应。这些结果表明,我们的CFF系统受到好评,并且有可能改善抑郁症状患者的治疗过程。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验