对提交至《试验》杂志的方案的评审与发表——我们在十年中学到了什么？
Review and publication of protocol submissions to Trials - what have we learned in 10 years?
作者信息
Li Tianjing, Boutron Isabelle, Al-Shahi Salman Rustam, Cobo Erik, Flemyng Ella, Grimshaw Jeremy M, Altman Douglas G
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room E6011, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
University Paris Descartes, Inserm Methods Team, CRESS-UMR 1153, Paris, France.
出版信息
Trials. 2016 Dec 16;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1743-0.
Abstract
Trials has 10 years of experience in providing open access publication of protocols for randomised controlled trials. In this editorial, the senior editors and editors-in-chief of Trials discuss editorial issues regarding managing trial protocol submissions, including the content and format of the protocol, timing of submission, approaches to tracking protocol amendments, and the purpose of peer reviewing a protocol submission. With the clarification and guidance provided, we hope we can make the process of publishing trial protocols more efficient and useful to trial investigators and readers.
摘要
《试验》在提供随机对照试验方案的开放获取出版方面拥有10年经验。在这篇社论中，《试验》的高级编辑和主编讨论了有关管理试验方案提交的编辑问题，包括方案的内容和格式、提交时间、跟踪方案修订的方法以及对方案提交进行同行评审的目的。通过提供的澄清和指导，我们希望能够使试验方案的出版过程对试验研究者和读者更高效且更有用。
相似文献
1
Review and publication of protocol submissions to Trials - what have we learned in 10 years?对提交至《试验》杂志的方案的评审与发表——我们在十年中学到了什么？
Trials. 2016 Dec 16;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1743-0.
2
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.心血管磁共振杂志：2017/2018 年度回顾。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Dec 30;21(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0594-8.
3
Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.研究方案和提案的同行评审与发表：开放获取期刊的作用
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 30;6(3):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e37.
4
Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) 2015-2016 and transition of the JCMR office to Boston.回顾《心血管磁共振杂志》（JCMR）2015-2016 年的出版情况以及该杂志办公室迁至波士顿的情况。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Dec 28;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0423-x.
5
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
6
Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review.期刊政策和编辑对同行评审的看法。
Elife. 2020 Nov 19;9:e62529. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62529.
7
Challenges for publishing Brazilian scientific health journals.巴西科学健康期刊出版面临的挑战。
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Mar;24(3):929-939. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018243.29952016.
8
Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern.生物安全以及对两用关注研究的审查与发表
Biosecur Bioterror. 2012 Sep;10(3):290-8. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0011. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
9
Nursing journal survey: information to help you publish.护理期刊调查：助您发表论文的信息
Nurse Educ. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):227-36.
10
Data Sharing: A New Editorial Initiative of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Implications for the Editors´ Network.数据共享：医学期刊编辑国际委员会的一项新编辑倡议。对编辑网络的影响。
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2017 Jun;45(4):377-384. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2017.92725.
引用本文的文献
1
N-acetyl cysteine for the treatment of alcohol use disorder: study protocol for a multi-site, double-blind randomised controlled trial (NAC-AUD study).N-乙酰半胱氨酸治疗酒精使用障碍：一项多中心、双盲随机对照试验的研究方案（NAC-AUD研究）
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e091631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091631.
2
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials.《SPIRIT 2025声明：随机试验方案的更新指南》
Nat Med. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03668-w.
3
SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.《SPIRIT 2025解释与阐述：随机试验方案更新指南》
BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081660. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081660.
4
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.《SPIRIT 2025声明：随机试验方案的更新指南》
BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081477. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081477.
5
SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.《SPIRIT 2025声明：随机试验方案的更新指南》
PLoS Med. 2025 Apr 28;22(4):e1004589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004589. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Pericardiectomy with routine cardiopulmonary bypass: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.常规体外循环下心包切除术：一项多中心随机对照试验
Trials. 2025 Apr 23;26(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08843-5.
7
Dermatitis during adjuvant irradiation for breast cancer (DAI-BREAC): a randomized controlled trial investigating whether grade ≥2 dermatitis during radiotherapy for breast cancer can be reduced by a mobile application that reminds patients to perform skin care.乳腺癌辅助放疗期间的皮炎（DAI-BREAC）：一项随机对照试验，旨在研究一款提醒患者进行皮肤护理的移动应用程序是否能减少乳腺癌放疗期间≥2级皮炎的发生。
Trials. 2025 Mar 20;26(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08800-2.
8
Empowerment and mobile technology in the detection and treatment of main cardiovascular risk factors of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (CARDIOSTROKE).缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者主要心血管危险因素检测与治疗中的赋权与移动技术：一项多中心随机对照试验（CARDIOSTROKE）方案
Trials. 2025 Mar 14;26(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08778-x.
9
Coproducing an Ecological Momentary Assessment Measurement Burst Mental Health Study With Young People: The MHIM Coproduction Protocol.与年轻人共同开展一项生态瞬时评估测量突发心理健康研究：心理健康瞬时评估共同生产协议。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70218. doi: 10.1111/hex.70218.
10
Protocol publication rate and comparison between article, registry and protocol in RCTs.随机对照试验中方案的发表率以及文章、注册信息与方案之间的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02471-y.
本文引用的文献
1
Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical Trials.迈向临床试验信任与透明的新时代。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1353-1354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14668.
2
Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov - The Final Rule.ClinicalTrials.gov 中的试验报告 - 最终规则。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1998-2004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1611785. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
3
From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials.从方案到发表报告：学术药物试验报告一致性的研究
Trials. 2016 Feb 19;17:100. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1189-4.
4
From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology.从方案到发表：肿瘤学随机试验中结果选择性报告的一项研究
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3583-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4148. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
5
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research.提高价值，减少浪费：解决研究的不可获取性问题。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):257-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
6
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 解释和说明：临床试验方案指南。
BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
7
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明：定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
8
Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols.发表的随机对照试验方法学质量与方案评估的实际质量不符。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):602-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.016. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
9
Challenges in the design and implementation of the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial--lessons for comparative effectiveness trials.多中心葡萄膜炎皮质类固醇治疗试验（MUST）设计和实施中的挑战——对比较效果试验的启示。
Clin Trials. 2011 Dec;8(6):736-43. doi: 10.1177/1740774511423682. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
10
Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles.随机试验入选标准报告：队列研究比较试验方案与后续文章。
BMJ. 2011 Apr 5;342:d1828. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1828.
Zotero 插件