Kaelin Agten Andrea, Cali Giuseppe, Monteagudo Ana, Oviedo Johana, Ramos Joanne, Timor-Tritsch Ilan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ARNAS Civico, Palermo, Italy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;216(5):510.e1-510.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
The term cesarean scar pregnancy refers to placental implantation within the scar of a previous cesarean delivery. The rising numbers of cesarean deliveries in the last decades have led to an increased incidence of cesarean scar pregnancy. Complications of cesarean scar pregnancy include morbidly adherent placenta, uterine rupture, severe hemorrhage, and preterm labor. It is suspected that cesarean scar pregnancies that are implanted within a dehiscent scar ("niche") behave differently compared with those implanted on top of a well-healed scar. To date there are no studies that have compared pregnancy outcomes between cesarean scar pregnancies implanted either "on the scar" or "in the niche."
The purpose of this study was to determine the pregnancy outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy implanted either "on the scar" or "in the niche."
This was a retrospective 2-center study of 17 patients with cesarean scar pregnancy that was diagnosed from 5-9 weeks gestation (median, 8 weeks). All cesarean scar pregnancies were categorized as either implanted or "on the scar" (group A) or "in the niche" (group B), based on their first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound examination. Clinical outcomes based on gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, blood loss at delivery, neonate weight and placental histopathologic condition were compared between the groups with the use of the Mann-Whitney U test. Myometrial thickness overlying the placenta was compared among all the patients who required hysterectomy and those who did not with the use of the Mann-Whitney U test. Myometrial thickness was also correlated with gestational age at delivery with the use of Spearman's correlation.
Group A consisted of 6 patients; group B consisted of 11 patients. Gestational age at delivery was lower in group B (median, 34 weeks; range, 20-36 weeks) than in group A (median, 38 weeks; range, 37-39 weeks; P=.001). In group A, 5 patients were delivered via cesarean delivery (with normal placenta), and 1 patient underwent a cesarean-hysterectomy for placenta accreta. In group B, 10 patients had a cesarean-hysterectomy for placenta increta/percreta, and 1 patient underwent gravid-hysterectomy for vaginal bleeding at 20 weeks gestation. Blood loss was increased, but not significantly higher in group B (median, 1200 mL; range, 600-4000 mL) than in group A (median, 700 mL; range, 600-1400 mL; P=.117). Myometrium was statistically significantly thinner in the patients group that require hysterectomy (median, 1 mm; range, 0-2 mm) than in the group that did not (median, 5 mm; range, 4-9 mm; P=.001). Myometrial thickness showed a positive correlation with the gestational age (r=0.820; P<.0005).
Patients with cesarean scar pregnancy implanted "on the scar" had a substantially better outcome compared with patients in whom the cesarean scar pregnancy implanted "in the niche." Myometrial thickness <2 mm in the first-trimester ultrasound examination is associated with morbidly adherent placenta at delivery.
剖宫产瘢痕妊娠是指胎盘植入既往剖宫产切口的瘢痕处。在过去几十年中,剖宫产分娩数量不断增加,导致剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的发生率上升。剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的并发症包括胎盘植入异常、子宫破裂、严重出血和早产。据推测,植入裂开瘢痕(“切口憩室”)内的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠与植入愈合良好瘢痕上的妊娠表现不同。迄今为止,尚无研究比较“在瘢痕上”或“在切口憩室内”植入的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的妊娠结局。
本研究的目的是确定“在瘢痕上”或“在切口憩室内”植入的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的妊娠结局。
这是一项回顾性双中心研究,研究对象为17例在妊娠5-9周(中位孕周8周)时被诊断为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的患者。根据孕早期经阴道超声检查结果,所有剖宫产瘢痕妊娠被分为“在瘢痕上”植入(A组)或“在切口憩室内”植入(B组)。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组在分娩孕周、分娩方式、分娩时出血量、新生儿体重和胎盘组织病理学情况等方面的临床结局。对所有需要子宫切除术和不需要子宫切除术的患者,使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较胎盘上方的肌层厚度。使用Spearman相关性分析肌层厚度与分娩孕周的相关性。
A组有6例患者;B组有11例患者。B组的分娩孕周(中位孕周34周;范围20-36周)低于A组(中位孕周38周;范围37-39周;P=0.001)。在A组中,5例患者通过剖宫产分娩(胎盘正常),1例患者因胎盘植入行剖宫产子宫切除术。在B组中,10例患者因胎盘植入异常/穿透性植入行剖宫产子宫切除术,1例患者在妊娠20周时因阴道出血行妊娠子宫切除术。B组的出血量增加,但与A组相比差异无统计学意义(B组中位出血量1200 mL;范围600-4000 mL;A组中位出血量700 mL;范围600-1400 mL;P=0.117)。需要子宫切除术的患者组的肌层厚度在统计学上显著薄于不需要子宫切除术的患者组(中位厚度1 mm;范围0-2 mm)(中位厚度5 mm;范围4-9 mm;P=0.001)。肌层厚度与孕周呈正相关(r=0.820;P<0.0005)。
“在瘢痕上”植入的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的结局明显优于“在切口憩室内”植入的患者。孕早期超声检查时肌层厚度<2 mm与分娩时胎盘植入异常有关。