• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠负压吸宫术后残留的预测列线图:一项回顾性研究

A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Lei Yan, Zhang Na, Liu Yu, Du Xin

机构信息

Hubei Province Women and Children Hospital, Wuhan, 430070, China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2
PMID:39901095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11789346/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to establish a predictive nomogram to evaluate the incidence of residual tissue in patients with endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy after negative pressure aspiration.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients treated in the gynecology department of our institution from May 2017 to August 2023 who underwent negative pressure suction treatment, ultrasound examinations before and after treatment, and received telephone follow-up for at least 6 months. A total of 899 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into a training cohort (629 patients, 70%) and a validation cohort (270 patients, 30%). Independent predictive factors were established using multivariate logistic regression. The resulting nomogram was validated using 1,000 bootstrap resampling, and calibration curves were plotted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and other metrics to assess its discriminative performance. Clinical decision curves were constructed to evaluate clinical applicability and quantify the net benefit within a range of threshold probabilities. The model was externally validated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Predictive factors included in the nomogram included age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.220, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.135-1.316), BMI (HR: 0.890, 95% CI: 0.796-0.986), intraoperative major hemorrhage (HR: 4.457, 95% CI: 1.610-12.292), maximum diameter of the gestational sac (HR: 1.572, 95% CI: 1.295, 1.914), and thickness of the remaining muscle layer of the lower uterine segment (HR: 1.572, 95% CI: 0.014, 0.430). The ROC curve of the resulting nomogram showed similar area under the curve values for the training (0.809, 95% CI: 0.751-0.867) and validation cohorts (0.814, 95% CI: 0.739, 0.888). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good model fit (P = 0.861), and the calibration curve was close to the ideal diagonal line. Decision curve analysis demonstrated good net benefit, and external validation confirmed its reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The model may aid in individual clinical decision-making, allowing clinicians to perform immediate postoperative assessments for patients with endogenous ectopic pregnancy in cesarean section scars treated with negative pressure suction, identify high-risk subpopulations, and select appropriate supplementary treatment in advance, making it particularly suitable for low-income areas and resource-limited primary hospitals.

摘要

背景

我们旨在建立一种预测列线图,以评估负压吸引术后内生性剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠患者残留组织的发生率。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2017年5月至2023年8月在我院妇科接受治疗的患者,这些患者接受了负压吸引治疗、治疗前后的超声检查,并接受了至少6个月的电话随访。共有899例患者符合纳入标准,分为训练队列(629例患者,70%)和验证队列(270例患者,30%)。使用多因素逻辑回归确定独立预测因素。使用1000次自抽样对所得列线图进行验证,并绘制校准曲线。进行受试者操作特征(ROC)分析以计算曲线下面积、敏感性、特异性和其他指标,以评估其判别性能。构建临床决策曲线以评估临床适用性,并在一系列阈值概率范围内量化净效益。该模型在验证队列中进行外部验证。

结果

列线图中纳入的预测因素包括年龄(风险比[HR]:1.220,95%置信区间[CI]:1.135-1.316)、体重指数(HR:0.890,95%CI:0.796-0.986)、术中大出血(HR:4.457,95%CI:1.610-12.292)、妊娠囊最大直径(HR:1.572,95%CI:1.295,1.914)以及子宫下段剩余肌层厚度(HR:1.572,95%CI:0.014,0.430)。所得列线图的ROC曲线显示,训练队列(0.809,95%CI:0.751-0.867)和验证队列(0.814,95%CI:0.739,0.888)的曲线下面积值相似。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验表明模型拟合良好(P = 0.861),校准曲线接近理想对角线。决策曲线分析显示净效益良好,外部验证证实了其可靠性。

结论

该模型可能有助于个体临床决策,使临床医生能够对接受负压吸引治疗的剖宫产瘢痕内生性异位妊娠患者进行术后即时评估,识别高危亚群,并提前选择合适的辅助治疗,特别适用于低收入地区和资源有限的基层医院。

相似文献

1
A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.内源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠负压吸宫术后残留的预测列线图:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2.
2
Predictive nomogram of ultrasound indicators for the termination outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠终止结局超声指标的预测列线图
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82894-7.
3
Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage.超声引导下吸引刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的疗效及安全性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):511-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.15857.
4
Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy Clinical Classification System With Recommended Surgical Strategy.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的临床分类系统与推荐的手术策略。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May 1;141(5):927-936. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005113. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
5
Cesarean section diverticulum area predicting the intraoperative hemorrhage at suction curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy after focused ultrasound ablation surgery.聚焦超声消融术后剖宫产瘢痕妊娠吸刮术中剖宫产憩室区域对术中出血的预测
Int J Hyperthermia. 2025 Dec;42(1):2468757. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2025.2468757. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
6
The value of ultrasound parameters in predicting the efficacy of transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.经腹超声引导下单纯抽吸刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠疗效的超声参数价值。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Jun;50(6):948-954. doi: 10.1111/jog.15927. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
A nomogram to predict the risk of scar pregnancy after caesarean section.预测剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠风险的列线图。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Dec;43(1):2142767. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2142767. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
8
A novel scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage following focused ultrasound ablation surgery in patients with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy.一种用于预测2型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者聚焦超声消融术后刮宫术中大出血的新型评分模型。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2025 Dec;42(1):2495362. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2025.2495362. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
9
Outcome and treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy under ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration.超声引导下负压吸引术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的结局及处理。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Oct;52(10):3000605241281692. doi: 10.1177/03000605241281692.
10
MRI-based scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.基于 MRI 的评分模型预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者刮宫术中大出血。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Oct;48(10):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03968-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive nomogram of ultrasound indicators for the termination outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠终止结局超声指标的预测列线图
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82894-7.
2
Conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with the combination of methotrexate and mifepristone: A systematic review.甲氨蝶呤联合米非司酮保守治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的系统评价。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241290424. doi: 10.1177/17455057241290424.
3
The value of ultrasound parameters in predicting the efficacy of transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
经腹超声引导下单纯抽吸刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠疗效的超声参数价值。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Jun;50(6):948-954. doi: 10.1111/jog.15927. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
4
Clinical value of ultrasonic indicators in predicting the outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy after pregnancy termination.超声指标在预测终止妊娠后剖宫产瘢痕妊娠结局中的临床价值。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06197-x.
5
Predictive value of crossover sign for outcome of ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration in women with Cesarean scar pregnancy.超声引导下负压吸引术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中交叉征对结局的预测价值。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;63(4):544-550. doi: 10.1002/uog.27459. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
MRI-based scoring model to predict massive hemorrhage during dilatation and curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.基于 MRI 的评分模型预测剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者刮宫术中大出血。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Oct;48(10):3195-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03968-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
7
Analysis of risk factors for patients with cesarean scar pregnancy treated with methotrexate combined with suction curettage.甲氨蝶呤联合吸宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的危险因素分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;308(3):913-918. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07049-x. Epub 2023 May 2.
8
Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy Clinical Classification System With Recommended Surgical Strategy.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的临床分类系统与推荐的手术策略。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May 1;141(5):927-936. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005113. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
9
Previous caesarean delivery and the presence of caesarean scar defects could affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.既往剖宫产分娩史及剖宫产瘢痕缺陷与体外受精-冻融胚胎移植后妊娠结局的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05085-0.
10
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.母胎医学会咨询系列第 63 号:剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):B9-B20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.024. Epub 2022 Jul 16.