Ho Adrian, Di Lonardo D Paolo, Bodelier Paul L E
Department of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Current affiliation: Institute of Microbiology, University of Hannover, Herrenhäuserstr. 2, 30140 Hannover, Germany.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017 Mar 1;93(3). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix006.
Microorganisms are physiologically diverse, possessing disparate genomic features and mechanisms for adaptation (functional traits), which reflect on their associated life strategies and determine at least to some extent their prevalence and distribution in the environment. Unlike animals and plants, there is an unprecedented diversity and intractable metabolic versatility among bacteria, making classification or grouping these microorganisms based on their functional traits as has been done in animal and plant ecology challenging. Nevertheless, based on representative pure cultures, microbial traits distinguishing different life strategies had been proposed, and had been the focus of previous reviews. In the environment, however, the vast majority of naturally occurring microorganisms have yet to be isolated, restricting the association of life strategies to broad phylogenetic groups and/or physiological characteristics. Here, we reviewed the literature to determine how microbial life strategy concepts (i.e. copio- and oligotrophic strategists, and competitor-stress tolerator-ruderals framework) are applied in complex microbial communities. Because of the scarcity of direct empirical evidence elucidating the associated life strategies in complex communities, we rely heavily on observational studies determining the response of microorganisms to (a)biotic cues (e.g. resource availability) to infer microbial life strategies. Although our focus is on the life strategies of bacteria, parallels were drawn from the fungal community. Our literature search showed inconsistency in the community response of proposed copiotrophic- and oligotrophic-associated microorganisms (phyla level) to changing environmental conditions. This suggests that tracking microorganisms at finer phylogenetic and taxonomic resolution (e.g. family level or lower) may be more effective to capture changes in community response and/or that edaphic factors exert a stronger effect in community response. We discuss the limitations and provide recommendations for future research applying microbial life strategies in environmental studies.
微生物在生理上具有多样性,拥有不同的基因组特征和适应机制(功能特性),这反映在它们相关的生存策略上,并至少在一定程度上决定了它们在环境中的流行程度和分布。与动物和植物不同,细菌之间存在前所未有的多样性和难以捉摸的代谢多功能性,使得像在动植物生态学中那样基于功能特性对这些微生物进行分类或分组具有挑战性。然而,基于代表性的纯培养物,已经提出了区分不同生存策略的微生物特性,并且这些特性一直是以往综述的重点。然而,在环境中,绝大多数天然存在的微生物尚未被分离出来,这限制了将生存策略与广泛的系统发育类群和/或生理特征联系起来。在这里,我们回顾了文献,以确定微生物生存策略概念(即富养型和贫养型策略者,以及竞争者-压力耐受者-杂草型框架)是如何应用于复杂的微生物群落的。由于缺乏直接的经验证据来阐明复杂群落中相关的生存策略,我们严重依赖于观察性研究,这些研究确定微生物对(非)生物线索(如资源可用性)的反应,以推断微生物的生存策略。尽管我们关注的是细菌的生存策略,但也从真菌群落中进行了类比。我们的文献检索表明,在拟富养型和贫养型相关微生物(门水平)对不断变化的环境条件的群落反应中存在不一致性。这表明,以更精细的系统发育和分类分辨率(如科级或更低)追踪微生物可能更有效地捕捉群落反应的变化,和/或土壤因素在群落反应中发挥更强的作用。我们讨论了局限性,并为未来在环境研究中应用微生物生存策略的研究提供了建议。