• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定可委托专业活动评估(EPA)10:紧急患者管理。

Development of an Assessment for Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) 10: Emergent Patient Management.

机构信息

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Anesthesiology, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):35-42. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31479. Epub 2016 Dec 5.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31479
PMID:28116006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226760/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medical schools in the United States are encouraged to prepare and certify the entrustment of medical students to perform 13 core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) prior to graduation. Entrustment is defined as the informed belief that the learner is qualified to autonomously perform specific patient-care activities. Core EPA-10 is the entrustment of a graduate to care for the emergent patient. The purpose of this project was to design a realistic performance assessment method for evaluating fourth-year medical students on EPA-10.

METHODS

First, we wrote five emergent patient case-scenarios that a medical trainee would likely confront in an acute care setting. Furthermore, we developed high-fidelity simulations to realistically portray these patient case scenarios. Finally, we designed a performance assessment instrument to evaluate the medical student's performance on executing critical actions related to EPA-10 competencies. Critical actions included the following: triage skills, mustering the medical team, identifying causes of patient decompensation, and initiating care. Up to four students were involved with each case scenario; however, only the team leader was evaluated using the assessment instruments developed for each case.

RESULTS

A total of 114 students participated in the EPA-10 assessment during their final year of medical school. Most students demonstrated competence in recognizing unstable vital signs (97%), engaging the team (93%), and making appropriate dispositions (92%). Almost 87% of the students were rated as having reached entrustment to manage the care of an emergent patient (99 of 114). Inter-rater reliability varied by case scenario, ranging from moderate to near-perfect agreement. Three of five case-scenario assessment instruments contained items that were internally consistent at measuring student performance. Additionally, the individual item scores for these case scenarios were highly correlated with the global entrustment decision.

CONCLUSION

High-fidelity simulation showed good potential for effective assessment of medical student entrustment of caring for the emergent patient. Preliminary evidence from this pilot project suggests content validity of most cases and associated checklist items. The assessments also demonstrated moderately strong faculty inter-rater reliability.

摘要

简介

美国的医学院校被鼓励在学生毕业前,准备并认证学生承担 13 项核心可委托专业活动(EPAs)的能力。委托是指对学习者有能力自主执行特定患者护理活动的知情信任。核心 EPA-10 是委托毕业生照顾紧急患者。本项目旨在设计一种现实的绩效评估方法,以评估四年级医学生在 EPA-10 方面的表现。

方法

首先,我们编写了五个可能在急性护理环境中遇到的紧急患者病例情景。此外,我们开发了高保真模拟来真实地描绘这些患者病例情景。最后,我们设计了一种绩效评估工具,以评估医学生在执行与 EPA-10 能力相关的关键行动方面的表现。关键行动包括以下内容:分诊技能、召集医疗团队、确定患者失代偿的原因以及启动护理。每个病例情景涉及多达四名学生,但只有团队负责人使用为每个病例开发的评估工具进行评估。

结果

共有 114 名学生在医学院的最后一年参加了 EPA-10 评估。大多数学生在识别不稳定生命体征(97%)、参与团队(93%)和做出适当处置(92%)方面表现出了能力。近 87%的学生被评为达到委托管理紧急患者护理的能力(114 人中的 99 人)。案例情景的评分者间信度不同,从中度到近乎完美的一致性。五个病例情景评估工具中的三个包含可衡量学生表现的内部一致性项目。此外,这些病例情景的单项得分与整体委托决策高度相关。

结论

高保真模拟在评估医学生对紧急患者护理的委托能力方面显示出了良好的潜力。该试点项目的初步证据表明,大多数病例和相关检查表项目具有内容有效性。评估还显示出中等强度的教师评分者间信度。

相似文献

1
Development of an Assessment for Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) 10: Emergent Patient Management.制定可委托专业活动评估(EPA)10:紧急患者管理。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):35-42. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31479. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
2
Evaluation of the Characteristics of a Workplace Assessment Form to Assess Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) in an Undergraduate Surgery Core Clerkship.评估本科外科核心实习中用于评估可托付专业活动(EPAs)的工作场所评估表的特征。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1211-1222. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
3
Constructing a Shared Mental Model for Faculty Development for the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency.构建用于住院医师入职核心可托付专业活动师资发展的共享心智模型。
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):759-764. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001511.
4
Implementing an Entrustable Professional Activities Framework in Undergraduate Medical Education: Early Lessons From the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency Pilot.在本科医学教育中实施可托付专业活动框架:美国医学协会医学院入学核心可托付专业活动试点项目的早期经验教训
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):765-770. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001543.
5
The Creation of Standard-Setting Videos to Support Faculty Observations of Learner Performance and Entrustment Decisions.创建标准设定视频以支持教师对学习者表现的观察和委托决策。
Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):204-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000853.
6
Finding a Path to Entrustment in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Progress Report From the AAMC Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency Entrustment Concept Group.探寻本科医学教育中的托付之道:美国医学协会(AAMC)住院医师入职核心可托付专业活动托付概念小组的进展报告
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):774-779. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001544.
7
Entrustable Professional Activity 10: Case Simulation and Assessment-STEMI With Cardiac Arrest.可托付专业活动10:病例模拟与评估——心脏骤停的ST段抬高型心肌梗死
MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Dec 23;12:10517. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10517.
8
Entrustment Decisions: Bringing the Patient Into the Assessment Equation.委托决策:将患者纳入评估考量因素
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):736-738. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001623.
9
Entrustable professional activities for Junior Brazilian Medical Students in community medicine.初级巴西医学生在社区医学中的可委托专业活动。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03762-4.
10
Evaluation of an undergraduate nursing entrustable professional activities framework: An exploratory qualitative research.本科护理可委托专业活动框架评估:探索性定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104343. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Entrustable professional activities, emergency medicine and medical education: a systematic review.可委托的专业活动、急诊医学与医学教育:一项系统综述
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 5;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00699-x.
2
Evaluation of high-fidelity and virtual reality simulation platforms for assessing fourth-year medical students' encounters with patients in need of urgent or emergent care.评估高保真和虚拟现实模拟平台,以评估四年级医学生在处理需要紧急或紧急护理的患者时的表现。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2382947. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2382947. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Filling the Core EPA 10 assessment void: A framework for individual assessment of Core Entrustable professional activity 10 competencies in medical students.填补核心EPA 10评估空白:医学生核心可托付专业活动10项能力的个体评估框架
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Nov 9;6(6):e10787. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10787. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Working with entrustable professional activities in clinical education in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.本科医学教育临床教学中委托专业活动的研究:一项范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02608-9.
5
Developing and Implementing an Entrustable Professional Activity Assessment for Pharmacy Practice Experiences.制定和实施药学实践经验的可委托专业活动评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7876. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7876.
6
Current Trends and Opportunities for Competency Assessment in Pharmacy Education-A Literature Review.药学教育中能力评估的当前趋势与机遇——文献综述
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jun 18;7(2):67. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7020067.
7
Exploratory Analysis of Entrustable Professional Activities as a Performance Measure During Early Pharmacy Practice Experiences.委托专业活动分析在早期药学实践经验中的绩效评估作用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Mar;83(2):6517. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6517.
8
A competency-based approach to critical care education.一种基于能力的重症监护教育方法。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):148-151. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_84_18.
9
Closing the Gap Between Entrustment and Resuscitation.弥合委托与复苏之间的差距。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;19(4):739-740. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.5.38176. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99.使用可托付专业活动(EPA)进行职场课程开发:AMEE 指南第 99 号
Med Teach. 2015;37(11):983-1002. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
2
Queen's simulation assessment tool: development and validation of an assessment tool for resuscitation objective structured clinical examination stations in emergency medicine.女王模拟评估工具:一种用于急诊医学复苏客观结构化临床考试站的评估工具的开发与验证
Simul Healthc. 2015 Apr;10(2):98-105. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000076.
3
The case for use of entrustable professional activities in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中使用可托付专业活动的理由。
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):431-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000586.
4
Are fourth-year medical students as prepared to manage unstable patients as they are to manage stable patients?四年级医学生处理不稳定患者的能力是否与处理稳定患者的能力相当?
Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):618-24. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000192.
5
Development and evaluation of a simulation-based resuscitation scenario assessment tool for emergency medicine residents.基于模拟的复苏场景评估工具在急诊住院医师中的开发和评估。
CJEM. 2012 May;14(3):139-46. doi: 10.2310/8000.2012.110385.
6
Emergency medicine clerkship curriculum: an update and revision.急诊医学实习课程:更新与修订。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):638-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00750.x.
7
Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.理解观察者间一致性:kappa统计量。
Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):360-3.