Suppr超能文献

在资源匮乏地区,同步放化疗与单纯放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的对比研究

Concurrent chemoradiation versus radiotherapy alone for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting.

作者信息

Pereira Elena, Cooper Hoover Henriquez, Zelaya Pedro Guillermo, Creasman William, Price Fredric V, Gupta Vishal, Chuang Linus

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

Hospital San Felipe, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2016 Dec 23;19:50-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2016.12.006. eCollection 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Our goal was to determine the clinical treatment response following radiation administered with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancers in Honduras. This is a retrospective study of patients treated with either concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone at a hospital in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. 70 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis was given in all cases. Brachytherapy was not available. Chemotherapy was given when available. Extrafascial hysterectomy was performed 6 weeks after completion of treatment in patients with a complete clinical response (cCR). Records for 165 women with locally advanced cervical cancer were reviewed; 25 (15.2%) stage IB2, 15 (9.1%) stage IIA, 90 (54.5%) stage IIB, and 35 (21.2%) stage IIIB. Ninety (54.5%) patients received EBRT alone; 75 (45.5%) received CCRT. Twenty-three (33.3%) of CCRT patients received weekly cisplatin, the remainder receiving other agents. Seventy (77.8%) of the 90 patients who received EBRT had a cCR; 25 out of 75 (33.3%) patients in the CCRT group achieved a cCR. The CCRT group treated with weekly cisplatin achieved an 80% cCR; while the CCRT group given alternative agents had only a 31% cCR. Patients unable to receive platinum-based CCRT had the worst outcome, and their responses were inferior to patients who received EBRT. The challenges of treating women with locally advanced cervical cancer in a low-resource setting are multifactorial and include treatment delays, the lack of brachytherapy and the unpredictable availability of chemotherapy.

摘要

我们的目标是确定在洪都拉斯,局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受放疗联合或不联合化疗后的临床治疗反应。这是一项对在洪都拉斯特古西加尔巴一家医院接受同步放化疗(CCRT)或单纯外照射放疗(EBRT)的患者的回顾性研究。所有病例均给予盆腔70 Gy的EBRT。无法进行近距离放疗。有条件时给予化疗。对治疗后获得完全临床缓解(cCR)的患者,在治疗完成6周后进行筋膜外子宫切除术。回顾了165例局部晚期宫颈癌女性患者的记录;其中25例(15.2%)为IB2期,15例(9.1%)为IIA期,90例(54.5%)为IIB期,35例(21.2%)为IIIB期。90例(54.5%)患者仅接受EBRT;75例(45.5%)接受CCRT。CCRT组中23例(33.3%)患者接受每周一次的顺铂治疗,其余患者接受其他药物治疗。接受EBRT的90例患者中有70例(77.8%)达到cCR;CCRT组75例患者中有25例(33.3%)达到cCR。接受每周一次顺铂治疗的CCRT组cCR率为80%;而接受其他药物治疗的CCRT组cCR率仅为31%。无法接受铂类CCRT的患者预后最差,其反应不如接受EBRT的患者。在资源匮乏地区治疗局部晚期宫颈癌女性患者面临的挑战是多方面的,包括治疗延迟、缺乏近距离放疗以及化疗药物供应不可预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7709/5226661/293148e29407/gr1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Efforts towards erasing borders in gynecologic cancer?消除妇科癌症边界的努力?
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017 May 10;21:5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2017.05.002. eCollection 2017 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
10
The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical carcinoma.宫颈癌治疗延长的不良影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30;32(5):1301-7. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00635-X.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验