Qi Senqing, Li Yangping, Tang Xuemei, Zeng Qinghong, Diao Liuting, Li Xiying, Li Hong, Hu Weiping
MOE Key Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710062, China.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing, China.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun;17(3):516-527. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0494-4.
Detached reappraisal and positive reappraisal are regarded as two distinct types of cognitive reappraisal strategy, and the former is considered more disengaging than the latter. The conceptual framework of emotion regulation choice posits that strategies involving disengagement operate earlier and more efficiently than engagement strategies. Here, we compare for the first time the temporal dynamics of detached and positive reappraisal during the regulation and re-exposure phases thereof by measuring event-related potentials. During the regulation phase, pictures were viewed or regulated using detached or positive reappraisal. During the re-exposure phase, the same pictures were viewed again. Results showed that during regulation, central-parietal late positive potentials (LPPs) were greatly attenuated under both strategy types, with the regulation effect of detached reappraisal occurring earlier than that of positive reappraisal and resulting in a stronger attenuation of LPP amplitudes. Upon re-exposure, detached reappraisal exerted enduring effects on self-reported arousal and the central-parietal LPP, whereas positive reappraisal had an enduring effect only on pleasantness. These findings demonstrate the differential effects of detached and positive reappraisal on valence, arousal, and neural responses, and underline the striking differences in the temporal dynamics of these reappraisal strategies.
超然重评和积极重评被视为两种不同类型的认知重评策略，且前者被认为比后者更具脱离性。情绪调节选择的概念框架假定，涉及脱离的策略比参与策略起效更早且效率更高。在此，我们首次通过测量事件相关电位，比较了超然重评和积极重评在调节阶段和重新暴露阶段的时间动态。在调节阶段，观看图片或使用超然重评或积极重评进行调节。在重新暴露阶段，再次观看相同的图片。结果显示，在调节过程中，两种策略类型下中央顶叶晚期正电位（LPPs）均大幅减弱，超然重评的调节效果比积极重评出现得更早，且导致LPP波幅的衰减更强。在重新暴露时，超然重评对自我报告的唤醒水平和中央顶叶LPP产生持久影响，而积极重评仅对愉悦感产生持久影响。这些发现证明了超然重评和积极重评在效价、唤醒水平和神经反应方面的不同影响，并突显了这些重评策略在时间动态上的显著差异。
