Suppr超能文献

与胰岛素相比,新型口服降糖药物可降低2型糖尿病患者全因死亡率、心血管事件及严重低血糖风险。

Novel oral glucose-lowering drugs are associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events and severe hypoglycaemia compared with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Nyström Thomas, Bodegard Johan, Nathanson David, Thuresson Marcus, Norhammar Anna, Eriksson Jan W

机构信息

Unit for Diabetes Research, Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

AstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic, Södertälje, Sweden.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jun;19(6):831-841. doi: 10.1111/dom.12889. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the association of novel oral glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), compared with that of insulin, with risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and severe hypoglycaemia.

METHODS

During 2013 to 2014 all patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden identified as new users of novel oral GLDs, either dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (only dapagliflozin available in Sweden during the study period), with those initiating insulin as a comparison group, in the Prescribed Drug Register were included and followed in the Patient and Cause of Death Registers. The novel GLD group and insulin group were matched 1:1 using propensity score. Cox regression models were used to estimate risks.

RESULTS

Of 37 603 patients, 21 758 were matched 1:1 to novel GLD vs insulin groups, with median follow-up times of 1.51 years (16 304 patient-years) and 1.53 years (16 306 patient-years), respectively. Treatment with novel GLDs was associated with a 44% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.49-0.64]), 15% (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.73-0.99]) and 74% (0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.57]) lower risk of all-cause mortality, CVD and hypoglycaemia, respectively, compared with insulin treatment. In separate analyses for the two novel GLDs, dapagliflozin was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and CVD (56% [HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.70] and 49% [HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.86], respectively), while DPP-4 inhibitor treatment was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (41% [HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.67]), but not with CVD (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel oral GLD treatment was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, CVD and severe hypoglycaemia compared with insulin treatment. Dapagliflozin was associated with a lower risk of both all-cause mortality and CVD, whereas DPP-4 inhibitor treatment was only associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality.

摘要

目的

研究新型口服降糖药(GLDs)与胰岛素相比,在全因死亡率、心血管疾病(CVD)和严重低血糖风险方面的关联。

方法

在2013年至2014年期间,瑞典所有被确定为新型口服GLDs新使用者的2型糖尿病患者,即二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂或钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2(SGLT2)抑制剂(研究期间瑞典仅可获得达格列净),与开始使用胰岛素的患者作为对照组,纳入处方药登记册,并在患者和死亡原因登记册中进行随访。使用倾向评分将新型GLD组和胰岛素组进行1:1匹配。采用Cox回归模型估计风险。

结果

在37603例患者中,21758例按1:1匹配至新型GLD组与胰岛素组,中位随访时间分别为1.51年(16304患者年)和1.53年(16306患者年)。与胰岛素治疗相比,新型GLDs治疗的全因死亡率、CVD和低血糖风险分别降低44%(风险比[HR]0.56[95%置信区间{CI}0.49 - 0.64])、15%(HR 0.85[95%CI 0.73 - 0.99])和74%(0.26[95%CI 0.12 - 0.57])。在对两种新型GLDs的单独分析中,达格列净与全因死亡率和CVD风险降低相关(分别为56%[HR 0.44,95%CI 0.28 - 0.70]和49%[HR 0.51,95%CI 0.30 - 0.86]),而DPP-4抑制剂治疗与全因死亡率风险降低相关(41%[HR 0.59,95%CI 0.51 - 0.67]),但与CVD无关(HR 0.87,95%CI 0.75 - 1.01)。

结论

与胰岛素治疗相比,新型口服GLD治疗与全因死亡率、CVD和严重低血糖风险降低相关。达格列净与全因死亡率和CVD风险降低相关,而DPP-4抑制剂治疗仅与全因死亡率风险降低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43fe/5485030/4e0fefcb3f02/DOM-19-831-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验