• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺结节的分子剖析:Afirma基因表达分类器在临床决策中的当前作用

Molecular Profiling of Thyroid Nodules: Current Role for the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier on Clinical Decision Making.

作者信息

Kloos Richard T

机构信息

Veracyte, Inc., Department of Medical Affairs, Senior Medical Director-Endocrinology, California, USA, Phone: +1(650)243-6300, E-mail:

出版信息

Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2017 Feb 9;26(Suppl 1):36-49. doi: 10.4274/2017.26.suppl.05.

DOI:10.4274/2017.26.suppl.05
PMID:28117288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5283710/
Abstract

Thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy results are cytologically indeterminate in 15-30% of cases. When these nodules undergo diagnostic surgery, approximately three-quarters are histologically benign. These unnecessary surgeries diminish quality of life, generate complications, and increase healthcare costs. The Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) is validated to pre-operatively identify cytologically indeterminate nodules likely to be truly benign so that surgery can be avoided. Its performance is supported by robust multicenter prospective and blinded clinical validation studies, and supported by extensive independent clinical utility publications which show a marked reduction in surgery among patients with benign Afirma GEC results. To rule-out cancer and avoid unnecessary diagnostic surgery, Afirma's quality and depth of validation stand alone. The accuracy of a benign result is the negative predictive value (NPV). Afirma achieves an NPV ≥94% among cytologically indeterminate nodules (Bethesda III or IV). Thirteen clinical utility studies describing 1468 GEC benign patients demonstrate that few Afirma GEC benign nodules undergo surgery, including after 3 years of follow-up. With a specificity of 52%, over half of the truly benign nodules with indeterminate cytology receive a benign GEC result. High test sensitivity is critical to safely rule out cancer. The Afirma GEC's 90% sensitivity means that regardless of the pre-test risk of malignancy, 90% of all malignant nodules are GEC suspicious. The Afirma GEC has transformed patient care. Where the majority of cytologically indeterminate patients were once operated to determine if the nodule was benign or malignant, now nearly half of these surgeries can be avoided.

摘要

甲状腺细针穿刺活检结果在15%至30%的病例中细胞学诊断不明确。当这些结节接受诊断性手术时,约四分之三在组织学上为良性。这些不必要的手术会降低生活质量、引发并发症并增加医疗成本。Afirma基因表达分类器(GEC)已得到验证,可在术前识别可能真正为良性的细胞学诊断不明确的结节,从而避免手术。其性能得到了强有力的多中心前瞻性和盲法临床验证研究的支持,也得到了大量独立临床效用出版物的支持,这些出版物表明,Afirma GEC结果为良性的患者手术量显著减少。为了排除癌症并避免不必要的诊断性手术,Afirma的验证质量和深度是独一无二的。良性结果的准确性即阴性预测值(NPV)。在细胞学诊断不明确的结节(贝塞斯达III级或IV级)中,Afirma的NPV≥94%。13项描述1468例GEC结果为良性患者的临床效用研究表明,很少有Afirma GEC结果为良性的结节会接受手术,包括在3年随访之后。由于特异性为52%,超过一半细胞学诊断不明确但真正为良性的结节获得了GEC良性结果。高检测灵敏度对于安全排除癌症至关重要。Afirma GEC的90%灵敏度意味着,无论术前恶性风险如何,所有恶性结节中有90%的GEC检测结果为可疑。Afirma GEC改变了患者护理模式。过去,大多数细胞学诊断不明确的患者会接受手术以确定结节是良性还是恶性,现在近一半的此类手术可以避免。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/0407bd39d8c4/MIRT-26-36-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/0b108f2adb46/MIRT-26-36-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/051f8d980de3/MIRT-26-36-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/b8601304b527/MIRT-26-36-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/c8305808ab53/MIRT-26-36-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/22c389af5805/MIRT-26-36-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/0407bd39d8c4/MIRT-26-36-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/0b108f2adb46/MIRT-26-36-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/051f8d980de3/MIRT-26-36-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/b8601304b527/MIRT-26-36-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/c8305808ab53/MIRT-26-36-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/22c389af5805/MIRT-26-36-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/828a/5283710/0407bd39d8c4/MIRT-26-36-g6.jpg

相似文献

1
Molecular Profiling of Thyroid Nodules: Current Role for the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier on Clinical Decision Making.甲状腺结节的分子剖析:Afirma基因表达分类器在临床决策中的当前作用
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2017 Feb 9;26(Suppl 1):36-49. doi: 10.4274/2017.26.suppl.05.
2
Multicenter clinical experience with the Afirma gene expression classifier.多中心临床应用 Afirma 基因表达分类器的经验。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jan;99(1):119-25. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2482. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
3
Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier Compared with Gene Expression Classifier in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.在不确定甲状腺结节中,Affirma 基因测序分类器与基因表达分类器的比较。
Thyroid. 2019 Aug;29(8):1115-1124. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0733. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Independent Comparison of the Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier and Gene Expression Classifier for Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.对细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节的 Afirma 基因组测序分类器和基因表达分类器的独立比较。
Thyroid. 2019 May;29(5):650-656. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0726. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
5
An independent study of a gene expression classifier (Afirma) in the evaluation of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.一项关于基因表达分类器(Afirma)在评估细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节中的独立研究。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Nov;99(11):4069-77. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3584. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
6
Performance of the Afirma genomic sequencing classifier versus gene expression classifier: An institutional experience.AfiRa 基因组测序分类器与基因表达分类器的性能比较:机构经验。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2019 Nov;127(11):720-724. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22188. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Performance of Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier versus Gene Expression Classifier in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.在细胞学不确定的甲状腺结节中,Afirma 基因测序分类器与基因表达分类器的性能比较。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2022 Mar-Apr;11(2):74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier vs gene expression classifier in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: An institutional experience.阿菲玛基因测序分类器与基因表达分类器在贝塞斯达III类甲状腺结节中的性能:一项机构经验。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 Aug;49(8):921-927. doi: 10.1002/dc.24765. Epub 2021 May 22.
9
Real-world Comparison of Afirma GEC and GSC for the Assessment of Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.基于临床数据对比评估 Afirma GEC 与 GSC 系统在甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学不确定病例中的应用。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Mar 1;105(3). doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz099.
10
Comparison of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier with Gene Sequencing Classifier in indeterminate thyroid nodules: A single-institutional experience.在不确定的甲状腺结节中比较 Afirma 基因表达分类器与基因测序分类器:单机构经验。
Cytopathology. 2021 Mar;32(2):187-191. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12920. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards an Integrated Multi-Omic Approach to Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration in Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology.迈向综合多组学方法以提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺诊断准确性,该结节细胞学结果为不确定。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;15(12):1506. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121506.
2
Molecular testing in indeterminate thyroid nodules: an additional tool for clinical decision-making.甲状腺结节不明者的分子检测:临床决策的附加工具。
Pathologica. 2023 Aug;115(4):205-216. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-887.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of molecular testing for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.

本文引用的文献

1
The diagnostic application of RNA sequencing in patients with thyroid cancer: an analysis of 851 variants and 133 fusions in 524 genes.RNA测序在甲状腺癌患者中的诊断应用:对524个基因中的851个变异和133个融合的分析
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Jan 11;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0849-9.
2
LONG-TERM NONOPERATIVE RATE OF THYROID NODULES WITH BENIGN RESULTS ON THE AFIRMA GENE EXPRESSION CLASSIFIER.在Afirma基因表达分类器检查结果为良性的甲状腺结节的长期非手术率
Endocr Pract. 2016 Jun;22(6):666-72. doi: 10.4158/EP151006.OR. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
3
Local molecular analysis of indeterminate thyroid nodules.
甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查结果不确定的结节行分子检测的成本效果分析。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec 21;51(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40463-022-00604-7.
4
Long-term Follow-up of Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules Found Benign on Molecular Testing: A Validation Study.分子检测显示为良性的细胞学检查结果不确定的甲状腺结节的长期随访:一项验证研究
OTO Open. 2022 Mar 18;6(1):2473974X221083542. doi: 10.1177/2473974X221083542. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
5
Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Involving the Thyroid Gland: A Clinicopathologic Study of 17 Patients.转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌累及甲状腺:17 例患者的临床病理研究。
Int J Surg Pathol. 2022 Oct;30(7):743-752. doi: 10.1177/10668969221081729. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
6
Aggressive Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Presenting with Metastasis to the Pancreas.侵袭性乳头状甲状腺癌伴胰腺转移
Case Rep Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 20;2022:5355419. doi: 10.1155/2022/5355419. eCollection 2022.
7
Current Achievements and Applications of Transcriptomics in Personalized Cancer Medicine.转录组学在个性化癌症医学中的当前成就和应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 31;22(3):1422. doi: 10.3390/ijms22031422.
8
Implications of US radiomics signature for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.美国影像组学特征对甲状腺结节不典型细胞学良恶性预测的意义。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5059-5067. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07670-3. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
9
Features of Cytologically Indeterminate Molecularly Benign Nodules Treated With Surgery.细胞学不确定但分子学良性结节的手术治疗特点。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Nov 1;105(11):e3971-80. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa506.
10
The Role of Molecular Testing for the Indeterminate Thyroid FNA.甲状腺细针穿刺抽吸活检结果不确定时的分子检测作用
Genes (Basel). 2019 Sep 23;10(10):736. doi: 10.3390/genes10100736.
甲状腺结节性质不明的局部分子分析
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec 1;44:52. doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0106-2.
4
Effect of Gene Expression Classifier Molecular Testing on the Surgical Decision-Making Process for Patients With Thyroid Nodules.基因表达分类器分子检测对甲状腺结节患者手术决策过程的影响。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec;141(12):1082-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2708.
5
Risk factors associated with malignancy and with triage to surgery in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS).与甲状腺结节恶性肿瘤以及分类为贝塞斯达III类(AUS/FLUS)的手术分诊相关的风险因素。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;42(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.09.026. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
Outcomes of thyroidectomy from a large California state database.来自加利福尼亚州一个大型数据库的甲状腺切除术结果。
Am J Surg. 2015 Dec;210(6):1170-6; discussion 1176-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Afirma GEC and thyroid lesions: An institutional experience.Afirma基因表达分类器与甲状腺病变:一项机构经验
Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Dec;43(12):966-70. doi: 10.1002/dc.23378. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
8
2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.2015年美国甲状腺协会成人甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌管理指南:美国甲状腺协会甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌指南工作组
Thyroid. 2016 Jan;26(1):1-133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020.
9
Effect of malignancy rates on cost-effectiveness of routine gene expression classifier testing for indeterminate thyroid nodules.恶性率对甲状腺结节性质不确定时常规基因表达分类器检测成本效益的影响。
Surgery. 2016 Jan;159(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.035. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
10
Has Afirma gene expression classifier testing refined the indeterminate thyroid category in cytology?Afirma基因表达分类器检测是否优化了甲状腺细胞学检查中的不确定类别?
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Feb;124(2):100-9. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21624. Epub 2015 Sep 30.