Shafiei Fereshteh, Memarpour Mahtab, Jowkar Zahra
Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(1):60-71.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the sealing ability of three different resin cements for the luting of a porcelain laminate veneer (PLV) to the enamel and dentin of fluorosed teeth.
Thirty incisors with moderate fluorosis according to the Thylstrup-Fejerskov Index (TFI = 4 to 6) received a veneer preparation with dentin margins at the gingival third. The IPS Empress (Ivoclar Vivadent) veneers were luted to the teeth of three groups (n = 10) using three different resin cements: Group 1: Excite DSC/Variolink II - etch-and-rinse (E&R), Group 2: ED Primer II/Clearfil Esthetic - self-etch (SE), Group 3: RelyX Unicem - self-adhesive (SA). After 24 h of water storage and thermocycling, marginal microleakage was evaluated on three slices from each tooth using the dye penetration technique under a digital microscope.
Data (microleakage percentage over the entire preparation length) were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (P < 0.05). Mean microleakage percentage was 0.8% to 18% at the enamel and dentin margins, respectively. On the enamel, Group 1 (E&R) exhibited significantly less microleakage compared to Groups 2 (SE; P = 0.03), and 3 (SA; P = 0.005). On the dentin, microleakage in Group 3 (SA) was significantly less than that in Groups 1 (E&R, P = 0.001), and 2 (SE; P = 0.03). The difference between the latter two groups was significant, with Group 1 (E&R) exhibiting the greatest microleakage.
The best enamel and dentin sealing of the cemented veneers was obtained with the E&R and SA luting agents, respectively.
本研究旨在调查三种不同树脂水门汀用于瓷贴面(PLV)粘结至氟斑牙釉质和牙本质的封闭能力。
根据蒂尔斯楚普-费耶尔斯科夫指数(TFI = 4至6)选取30颗中度氟斑牙切牙,在牙龈三分之一处制备带有牙本质边缘的贴面。使用三种不同树脂水门汀将义获嘉全瓷贴面(Ivoclar Vivadent)粘结至三组(n = 10)牙齿:第1组:Excite DSC/Variolink II - 酸蚀冲洗(E&R);第2组:ED Primer II/Clearfil Esthetic - 自酸蚀(SE);第3组:RelyX Unicem - 自粘结(SA)。储水24小时并进行热循环后,使用染料渗透技术在数码显微镜下对每颗牙齿的三个切片评估边缘微渗漏情况。
使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney检验(P < 0.05)分析数据(整个制备长度上的微渗漏百分比)。在釉质和牙本质边缘,平均微渗漏百分比分别为0.8%至18%。在釉质上,第1组(E&R)与第2组(SE;P = 0.03)和第3组(SA;P = 0.005)相比,微渗漏显著更少。在牙本质上,第3组(SA)的微渗漏显著少于第1组(E&R,P = 0.001)和第2组(SE;P = 0.03)。后两组之间的差异显著,第1组(E&R)的微渗漏最大。
分别使用酸蚀冲洗和自粘结粘结剂可获得粘结贴面最佳的釉质和牙本质封闭效果。