Toman Muhittin, Cal Ebru, Türkün Murat, Ertuğrul Fahinur
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.
J Dent. 2008 Apr;36(4):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.01.006. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
Effect of different adhesive luting systems on the shear bond strength of IPS Empress 2 ceramic restorations to fluorosed enamel surface was investigated.
Forty-eight ceramic discs (2 mm x 3 mm; IPS Empress 2) were fabricated. Twenty-four non-carious extracted human molar teeth with fluorosis and 24 without fluorosis were cleaned with pumice using a plastic brush and then they were divided into two main groups. The IPS Empress 2 ceramic discs were luted to the teeth of four subgroups with two different adhesive luting systems, Variolink 2/Excite DSC (etch-and-rinse) and Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II (self-etch), thermocycling was performed 5000 times. Shear bond strengths were tested using Shimadzu Universal Testing Machine until failure. An optical microscope and image analyzer were used at 10x and 1000x magnification to analyze the surfaces for adhesive, cohesive and mixed failure percentages. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey test at a significance level of p<0.05.
Mean shear bond strength data of the groups in MPa were; Variolink 2/Excite DSC on fluorosed enamel: 18.3+/-3.08, Variolink 2/Excite DSC on non-fluorosed enamel: 18.79+/-2.65, Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II on fluorosed enamel: 8.43+/-2.45, Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II on non-fluorosed enamel: 13.53+/-1.68. Mixed failure was the most prevalent type of failure in moderate fluorosed and non-fluorosed teeth with etch-and-rinse dentin bonding system, and in fluorosed teeth with self-etch dentin bonding system.
The use of an etch-and-rinse adhesive luting procedure produced higher bond strengths of glass-ceramics bonded to fluorosed and non-fluorosed enamel surfaces than the self-etch bonding system.
研究不同粘结剂系统对IPS Empress 2全瓷修复体与氟斑牙釉质表面之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
制作48个陶瓷圆盘(2毫米×3毫米;IPS Empress 2)。24颗有氟斑的非龋性拔除人磨牙和24颗无氟斑的磨牙用塑料刷蘸浮石清洁,然后分为两个主要组。将IPS Empress 2陶瓷圆盘用两种不同的粘结剂系统粘结到四个亚组的牙齿上,即Variolink 2/Excite DSC(酸蚀冲洗)和Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II(自酸蚀),进行5000次热循环。使用岛津万能试验机测试剪切粘结强度直至破坏。使用光学显微镜和图像分析仪在10倍和1000倍放大倍数下分析表面的粘结、内聚和混合破坏百分比。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析,显著性水平为p<0.05。
各组以MPa为单位的平均剪切粘结强度数据如下:Variolink 2/Excite DSC粘结于氟斑牙釉质:18.3±3.08,Variolink 2/Excite DSC粘结于非氟斑牙釉质:18.79±2.65,Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II粘结于氟斑牙釉质:8.43±2.45,Clearfil Esthetic Cement/ED Primer II粘结于非氟斑牙釉质:13.53±1.68。在中度氟斑牙和非氟斑牙中,采用酸蚀冲洗牙本质粘结系统时,以及在氟斑牙中采用自酸蚀牙本质粘结系统时,混合破坏是最常见的破坏类型。
与自酸蚀粘结系统相比,采用酸蚀冲洗粘结程序时玻璃陶瓷与氟斑牙和非氟斑牙釉质表面的粘结强度更高。