1 International Research Collaborative-Oral Health and Equity: School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Australia.
2 Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Australia.
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Apr;24(3):147-156. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16689433. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Objective This review is designed to inform future decisions about the benefits of integrating teledentistry into routine health services, by presenting an overview of the evidence for the effectiveness and economic impact of teledentistry. Methods Two reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases through November 2016 to identify published peer-reviewed studies in English. Teledentistry studies were included if they were; (a) controlled (randomised or non-randomised) assessment studies; and (b) compared outcomes of a teledentistry intervention in terms of clinical or economic evaluation with the outcomes of traditional clinical alternatives. The quality of the studies was evaluated using a quality appraisal tool that considered study performance and design. Results This review identified 385 publications, of which 217 full-text articles were retrieved for further inspection. Of these, only 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. Nine of the included articles showed some clinical outcomes; the other two were primarily economic analyses. The balance of these studies assesed the efficacy of teledentistry interventions rather than their effectiveness. Four studies (36%) achieved higher quality scores and have greater potential to influence health-care decision-making. To date, the most convincing published evidence regarding the efficacy of teledentistry was provided by studies on paediatric dentistry, orthodontics and oral medicine. The economic analysis referred only to cost-minimisation, suggesting that the use of teleconsultation in dentistry can be cost-saving when compared to a conventional consultation. However, high-quality economic studies on teledentistry are rare. Conclusion There is emerging evidence supporting the efficacy of teledentistry. However, there is not yet enough conclusive evidence, particularly for its effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and long-term use, to make evidence-based policy decisions on teledentistry.
目的 本综述旨在通过概述远程牙科的有效性和经济影响的证据,为未来将远程牙科纳入常规卫生服务的决策提供信息。
方法 两位审查员通过 2016 年 11 月检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库,以确定发表的同行评议的英文研究。如果远程牙科研究符合以下条件,则将其纳入研究:(a) 对照(随机或非随机)评估研究;(b) 比较远程牙科干预的临床或经济评估结果与传统临床替代方案的结果。使用考虑研究表现和设计的质量评估工具评估研究的质量。
结果 本综述共确定了 385 篇出版物,其中有 217 篇全文文章被检索以进一步检查。其中,只有 11 篇文章符合纳入标准。纳入的 11 篇文章中有 9 篇显示出一些临床结果;另外两篇主要是经济分析。这些研究中的平衡评估了远程牙科干预的功效,而不是它们的有效性。其中四项研究(36%)获得了更高的质量评分,更有可能影响医疗保健决策。迄今为止,关于远程牙科功效的最有说服力的已发表证据来自儿科牙科、正畸学和口腔医学的研究。经济分析仅涉及成本最小化,表明与传统咨询相比,在牙科中使用远程咨询可以节省成本。然而,高质量的远程牙科经济研究很少。
结论 有越来越多的证据支持远程牙科的功效。然而,目前还没有足够的结论性证据,特别是关于其有效性、成本效益和长期使用,以便在远程牙科方面做出基于证据的政策决策。
J Telemed Telecare. 2017-1-24
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Health Technol Assess. 2006-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-2
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025-4-30
Front Oral Health. 2025-4-14
Healthcare (Basel). 2025-2-23