• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在日常临床实践中评估骨折风险时,墨西哥FRAX评分纳入和不纳入骨密度值的一致性。

Agreement of Mexican FRAX with and without the value of bone mineral density in assessing the risk of fracture in daily clinical practice.

作者信息

Horta-Baas Gabriel, Pérez Bolde-Hernández Arturo, Pérez-Pérez Argelia, Vergara-Sánchez Imelda, Romero-Figueroa María Del Socorro

机构信息

Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital General Regional 220, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Toluca, Estado de México, México.

Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital General Regional 220, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Toluca, Estado de México, México.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 2017 May 10;148(9):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.11.025. Epub 2017 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.medcli.2016.11.025
PMID:28118961
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of FRAX without the inclusion of bone mineral density (FRAX-BMI) may be useful in clinical practice to identify patients at high risk of fracture and inform treatment decisions, but its usefulness is debated. The aim of the study is to evaluate the agreement between the risk of fracture calculated by FRAX with or without bone mineral density (BMD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 431 women (40-90 years) without treatment. The concordance of the probability of fracture was assessed by the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and by Bland-Altman method. The kappa index was used to evaluate the agreement between treatment indications.

RESULTS

The difference between the risks of a major osteoporosis fracture (MOFR) was 1.02±1.40% (95% CI -2 to 1.90) and -0.03±0.51% (95% CI -1.18 to 1.32) for the hip fracture risk (HFR). Agreement between MOFR and HFR FRAX scores was good (CCC 0.879, 95% CI 0.85-0.90 and CCC 0.821, 95% CI 0.79-0.85, respectively). The correlation between BMD of the femoral neck and fracture risk calculated by FRAX-BMI was a moderate, MOFR (r=-0.55, P<.001) and HFR (r=-0.54, P<.001). The agreement between the recommendations of treatment was 87% (kappa 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

The good agreement between the risk of fracture obtained suggests that FRAX-BMI allows us to provide an estimate of risk in most cases.

摘要

引言

在临床实践中,使用不包含骨密度的FRAX(FRAX-BMI)可能有助于识别骨折高危患者并指导治疗决策,但其有效性存在争议。本研究的目的是评估使用或不使用骨密度(BMD)的FRAX计算的骨折风险之间的一致性。

患者与方法

对431名未接受治疗的40至90岁女性进行了横断面研究。通过一致性相关系数(CCC)和Bland-Altman方法评估骨折概率的一致性。kappa指数用于评估治疗指征之间的一致性。

结果

主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOFR)风险之间的差异为1.02±1.40%(95%CI -2至1.90),髋部骨折风险(HFR)为-0.03±0.51%(95%CI -1.18至1.32)。MOFR和HFR的FRAX评分之间的一致性良好(CCC分别为0.879,95%CI 0.85 - 0.90和CCC 0.821,95%CI 0.79 - 0.85)。股骨颈骨密度与FRAX-BMI计算的骨折风险之间的相关性为中等,MOFR(r = -0.55,P <.001)和HFR(r = -0.54,P <.001)。治疗建议之间的一致性为87%(kappa 0.61)。

结论

所获得的骨折风险之间的良好一致性表明,FRAX-BMI在大多数情况下能够让我们对风险进行估计。

相似文献

1
Agreement of Mexican FRAX with and without the value of bone mineral density in assessing the risk of fracture in daily clinical practice.在日常临床实践中评估骨折风险时,墨西哥FRAX评分纳入和不纳入骨密度值的一致性。
Med Clin (Barc). 2017 May 10;148(9):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.11.025. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
2
Correlation between osteoporotic fracture risk in Brazilian postmenopausal women calculated using the FRAX with and without the inclusion of bone densitometry data.在巴西绝经后女性中,使用FRAX计算的骨质疏松性骨折风险在纳入和未纳入骨密度测量数据时的相关性。
Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11:16. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0255-y. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
3
Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)与日本中老年女性骨质疏松症的诊断:千叶骨调查
Endocr J. 2018 Feb 26;65(2):193-202. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0331. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
4
Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.三种用于识别中国老年男性疼痛性新发骨质疏松性椎体骨折工具的验证:骨密度、亚洲人骨质疏松自我评估工具和骨折风险评估工具。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Apr 22;11:461-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S101078. eCollection 2016.
5
Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.应用世界卫生组织骨折风险评估工具预测绝经后女性进行双能X线吸收测定扫描的必要性。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;54(6):722-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.005.
6
Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) Results Calculated With and Without Bone Mineral Density Values for the Evaluation of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia.基于骨密度值和不基于骨密度值的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®)结果计算在骨质疏松症绝经后妇女中评估骨折风险。
J Clin Densitom. 2018 Oct-Dec;21(4):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.027. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.双能X线吸收法、跟骨定量超声以及骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®和骨质疏松风险评估仪)在识别桡骨远端或髋部骨折女性中的应用:一项初步研究。
Endocr Res. 2016 Aug;41(3):248-60. doi: 10.3109/07435800.2015.1120744. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
Establish and validate the reliability of predictive models in bone mineral density by deep learning as examination tool for women.建立和验证深度学习作为女性骨密度检查工具的预测模型的可靠性。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Jan;35(1):129-141. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06913-5. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
9
Is there an interaction between socioeconomic status and FRAX 10-year fracture probability determined with and without bone density measures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study of female cohort.在使用和不使用骨密度测量方法所确定的社会经济地位与FRAX 10年骨折概率之间是否存在相互作用?来自吉朗女性队列骨质疏松症研究的数据。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2015 Feb;96(2):138-44. doi: 10.1007/s00223-014-9946-4. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
The activity of a Spanish bone densitometry unit revisited under the point of view of FRAX.从FRAX的角度重新审视一家西班牙骨密度测量单位的活动。
Reumatol Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 May 18.