Hutter Matthew M, Behrns Kevin E, Soper Nathaniel J, Michelassi Fabrizio
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Apr;21(4):755-760. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3331-8. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
There is the need for well-trained advanced GI surgeons. The super specialization seen in academic and large community centers may not be applicable for surgeons practicing in other settings. The pendulum that has been swinging toward narrow specialization is swinging the other way, as many trained subspecialists are having a harder time finding positions after fellowship, and if they do find a position, the majority of their practice can actually be advanced GI surgery and not exclusively their area of focused expertise. Many hospitals/practices desire surgeons who are competent and specifically credentialed to perform a variety of advanced GI procedures from the esophagus through the anus. Furthermore, broader exposure in training may provide complementary and overlapping skills that may lead to an even better trained GI surgeon compared to someone whose experience is limited to just the liver and pancreas, or to just the colon and rectum, or to only bariatric and foregut surgery. With work hour restrictions and limitations on autonomy for current trainees in residency, many senior trainees have not developed the skills and knowledge to allow them to be competent and comfortable in the broad range of GI surgery. Such training should reflect the needs of the patients and their diseases, and reflect what many practicing surgeons are currently doing, and what many trainees say they would like to do, if there were such fellowship pathways available to them. The goal is to train advanced GI surgeons who are competent and proficient to operate throughout the GI tract and abdomen with open, laparoscopic, and endoscopic techniques in acute and elective situations in a broad variety of complex GI diseases. The program may be standalone, or prepare a surgeon for additional subspecialty training (transition to fellowship and/or to practice). This group of surgeons should be distinguished from subspecialist surgeons who focus in a narrow area of GI surgery. Advanced GI surgery training could occupy the area between general surgery residency and further subspecialty training as seen in the graph below. Visually, we are trying to define the red hash mark area. This is challenging as the inner border with core general surgery is ill defined and interpreted differently by various stakeholders. Similarly, the outer border of the red hash marks, which defines areas that require a surgical subspecialist, is also not clear. Inevitably, overlap exists in the care of these patients and is influenced by the complexity of the underlying disease presentations. The concept is noble, but the future is unclear. Challenges and uncertainties include whether the Certificate of Focused Expertise will go forward, and what the RRC and ABS might decide on the structure of General Surgery training. Funding and the ability to offer autonomy during training are additional challenges in today's training environment. Currently, the ABS is considering a "Core Plus" concept, though what is "the Core" and what is the "Plus" are not yet determined, and these concepts have been promoted for years. Whether training becomes 4 +1, or 4 +1+1, 5+1 or some other model continues to be discussed. We, the Task Force of Advanced GI Surgery Training, have drafted a vision of what advanced GI training could/should look like to help guide the ABMS/ABS/RRC/ACGME as they contemplate surgery residency redesign goals. Despite the uncertainty, we will develop the curriculum, milestones, and case requirements for advanced GI surgery training, to not only provide this vision but so that an advanced GI training program is ready to go, to be plugged in to whatever the future structure for surgical training may be.
对训练有素的高级胃肠外科医生存在需求。在学术中心和大型社区中心出现的超级专科化可能不适用于在其他环境中执业的外科医生。曾经向狭窄专科化摆动的钟摆正在向另一个方向摆动,因为许多经过培训的亚专科医生在完成 fellowship 后更难找到职位,而且即使他们找到了职位,他们的大部分业务实际上可能是高级胃肠外科手术,而不仅仅是他们专注的专业领域。许多医院/医疗机构希望外科医生有能力且具备专门资质,能够实施从食管到肛门的各种高级胃肠手术。此外,与经验仅限于肝脏和胰腺、或仅限于结肠和直肠、或仅进行减肥和前肠手术的人相比,更广泛的培训经历可能会提供互补和重叠的技能,从而培养出训练更有素的胃肠外科医生。由于目前住院医师培训中的工作时间限制和自主权限制,许多高年级住院医师尚未培养出在广泛的胃肠外科手术中胜任且自如操作所需的技能和知识。这样的培训应反映患者及其疾病的需求,反映许多执业外科医生目前所做的工作,以及许多住院医师表示如果有这样的 fellowship 途径他们想要做的事情。目标是培养有能力且熟练的高级胃肠外科医生,他们能够在各种复杂的胃肠疾病的急性和择期情况下,运用开放、腹腔镜和内镜技术在整个胃肠道和腹部进行手术。该项目可以是独立的,也可以为外科医生进行额外的亚专科培训做准备(过渡到 fellowship 和/或执业)。这组外科医生应与专注于胃肠外科狭窄领域的亚专科外科医生区分开来。如下文图表所示,高级胃肠外科培训可以占据普通外科住院医师培训和进一步亚专科培训之间的区域。直观地说,我们试图定义红色哈希标记区域。这具有挑战性,因为与核心普通外科的内边界定义不明确,不同利益相关者有不同解读。同样,定义需要外科亚专科医生的红色哈希标记的外边界也不清晰。不可避免地,这些患者的护理存在重叠,并且受到潜在疾病表现复杂性的影响。这个概念是高尚的,但未来尚不明朗。挑战和不确定性包括专注专业证书是否会推进,以及外科学会认可委员会(RRC)和美国外科学院(ABS)可能会就普通外科培训的结构做出什么决定。在当今的培训环境中,资金和在培训期间提供自主权的能力是额外的挑战。目前,ABS 正在考虑一个“核心加”的概念,尽管什么是“核心”以及什么是“加”尚未确定,而且这些概念已经推广多年。培训是成为 4 +1,还是 4 +1+1,5+1 或其他某种模式仍在讨论中。我们,高级胃肠外科培训特别工作组,已经起草了一份关于高级胃肠培训可能/应该是什么样的愿景,以帮助指导美国医学专业委员会(ABMS)/ABS/RRC/毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)思考外科住院医师培训重新设计目标。尽管存在不确定性,我们将制定高级胃肠外科培训的课程、里程碑和病例要求,不仅是为了提供这个愿景,也是为了让高级胃肠培训项目准备就绪,以便融入未来外科培训的任何结构中。