Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;24(5):1178-1188. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2070. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
The burden and severity of student mental health continue to increase in parallel with increasing financial pressures on students and services alike. There is a need for a student-specific measure of distress that acknowledges their unique context. This study examined the feasibility, acceptance, and initial psychometric properties of a US measure, the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS), in a UK student sample.
A sample of 294 UK help-seeking students from two universities completed the CCAPS-62 and Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) as a comparator. The factor solution and reliability of the CCAPS-62 were examined. Correlations and clinical boundaries were determined between the CCAPS-62 subscales and CORE-10, and comparisons were made with US published norms.
The CCAPS-62 demonstrated a strong factor solution that matched the intended subscales. All subscales had good reliability and correlated significantly with the CORE-10. The agreement on caseness between the two measures was 92.8% with 86.3% reaching clinical threshold on both the CCAPS-62 and CORE-10. Severity was most noticeable for academic distress, depression, anxiety, and social anxiety. Compared to US data, UK students showed higher clinical severity for all psychological symptoms.
The CCAPS-62 is a reliable and psychometrically valid assessment measure to use with UK students without revision. The overall distress indicated is similar to that of the CORE-10, but the individual subscales are more informative of specific student concerns including academic distress, social anxiety, and substance abuse. Potential benefits of administering a student-focused assessment measure in student counselling services are discussed.
University students attending counselling in the UK demonstrate clinical severity for academic distress, depression, anxiety, and social anxiety. Compared to university students in the US, UK students present with higher clinical severity on all contextual measures of student psychological distress. It is advantageous for university counselling services to administer a student-specific clinical measure over measures intended for the general clinical population. CCAPS-62 is an acceptable, feasible, and psychometrically valid measure of student psychological distress that can be used in the UK without revision. It is important for university counselling services to continue to provide support from therapists that are trained and experienced in the university context over services intended for the general clinical population.
随着学生和服务机构面临的经济压力不断增加,学生心理健康的负担和严重程度也在与之同步增加。因此,我们需要一种专门针对学生的压力评估工具,以承认他们所处的独特环境。本研究在美国的一项研究中,对一种名为“咨询中心心理症状评估”(CCAPS)的工具在英国学生样本中的可行性、接受程度和初步心理测量学特性进行了检验。
两所大学的 294 名寻求帮助的英国学生完成了 CCAPS-62 和临床结果的常规评估(CORE-10),后者作为比较。对 CCAPS-62 的因子结构和信度进行了检验。确定了 CCAPS-62 各分量表与 CORE-10 之间的相关性和临床界限,并与美国发表的常模进行了比较。
CCAPS-62 表现出了与预期分量表相匹配的强有力的因子结构。所有分量表的信度都很好,并且与 CORE-10 显著相关。这两个测量工具在判断是否为病例方面的一致性为 92.8%,86.3%的学生同时达到了 CCAPS-62 和 CORE-10 的临床阈值。学业困扰、抑郁、焦虑和社交焦虑的严重程度最为明显。与美国的数据相比,英国学生的所有心理症状的临床严重程度都更高。
CCAPS-62 是一种可靠且具有心理测量学效度的评估工具,无需修订即可用于英国学生。总体压力与 CORE-10 相似,但个别分量表更能反映学生的具体关注点,包括学业困扰、社交焦虑和药物滥用。讨论了在学生咨询服务中使用以学生为中心的评估工具的潜在好处。
在英国接受咨询的大学生表现出学业困扰、抑郁、焦虑和社交焦虑的临床严重程度。与美国的大学生相比,英国学生在所有学生心理困扰的情境性评估工具上表现出更高的临床严重程度。对于大学咨询服务来说,使用专门针对学生的临床测量工具而不是针对一般临床人群的测量工具是有利的。CCAPS-62 是一种可接受、可行且具有心理测量学效度的学生心理困扰评估工具,无需修订即可在英国使用。重要的是,大学咨询服务应继续为那些在大学环境中接受过培训和经验丰富的治疗师提供支持,而不是为一般临床人群提供服务。