• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨文化验证和心理测量学测试心理咨询中心心理症状评估:塞尔维亚的经验。

Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the counseling center assessment of psychological symptoms: experience of Serbia.

机构信息

Department of Humanities.

Institute of Social Medicine, Faculty of medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 23;36(6):1530-1538. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa119.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daaa119
PMID:34942003
Abstract

Psychological distress in university students represents a rising public health concern. The complexity of this phenomenon calls for a more in-depth scrutiny, in order to address the wide diversity of mental health issues that may arise in this population. The instrument designed for the purpose of measuring the student-specific distress is needed. An appropriate tool is the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms 62 (CCAPS-62), multidimensional scale widely used at many universities. The objective of the present study was to translate, culturally adapt and psychometrically validate CCAPS-62 in Serbian student population. A total of 1326 Belgrade University students were recruited from twelve different faculties. Considering the possible culturally conditioned differences in the quality of distress both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. The results of the exploratory factor analysis supported the eight-factor model with the item composition of the factors different to a certain extent from the original version. This measurement model was verified by confirmatory factor analysis. Findings demonstrated good internal consistency for the total scale as well as for the eight subscales applied among Serbian students. Implications are discussed with respect to the cultural context of mental health concerns in student population.

摘要

大学生的心理困扰是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。这种现象很复杂,需要更深入地研究,以解决这一人群中可能出现的广泛的心理健康问题。需要设计一种专门用于测量学生特定困扰的工具。一种合适的工具是咨询中心心理症状评估 62 项(CCAPS-62),这是一种多维量表,在许多大学广泛使用。本研究的目的是在塞尔维亚学生群体中翻译、文化适应和心理测量验证 CCAPS-62。从 12 个不同学院共招募了 1326 名贝尔格莱德大学的学生。考虑到困扰质量在文化上可能存在差异,因此进行了探索性和验证性因素分析。探索性因素分析的结果支持了具有八项因素的模型,这些因素的项目组成在一定程度上与原始版本不同。该测量模型通过验证性因素分析得到验证。研究结果表明,该量表以及应用于塞尔维亚学生的八个分量表的整体内部一致性良好。讨论了这些发现对学生群体心理健康问题的文化背景的影响。

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the counseling center assessment of psychological symptoms: experience of Serbia.跨文化验证和心理测量学测试心理咨询中心心理症状评估:塞尔维亚的经验。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 23;36(6):1530-1538. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa119.
2
The Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS-62): Acceptance, feasibility, and initial psychometric properties in a UK student population.《咨询中心心理症状评估(CCAPS-62)》:在英国学生群体中的接受度、可行性和初步心理测量学特性。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;24(5):1178-1188. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2070. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
Development of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms-Japanese version: Pilot study.心理咨询中心心理症状评估量表的编制:预研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jan;27(1):97-105. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2412. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
Measurement invariance and psychometric properties of the CCAPS-62 and -34 for international student clients.CCAPS - 62和CCAPS - 34在国际学生客户群体中的测量不变性及心理测量特性。
J Clin Psychol. 2023 May;79(5):1261-1279. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23476. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
5
Validation of the Temps-A in university student population in Serbia.塞尔维亚大学生群体中 Temps-A 的验证。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
6
Development of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms-62 (CCAPS-62).发展心理咨询中心心理症状评估-62 项(CCAPS-62)。
J Couns Psychol. 2011 Jan;58(1):97-109. doi: 10.1037/a0021282.
7
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Serbian Version of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Scale.《Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Scale 斯堪的纳维亚版本的跨文化适应性和验证》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 19;20(4):3699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043699.
8
Development of a shorter version of the osteoporosis knowledge assessment tool.骨质疏松症知识评估工具简短版本的开发。
Women Health. 2012;52(1):18-31. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2011.635246.
9
Clinical validity of the counseling center assessment of psychological symptoms-62 (CCAPS-62): further evaluation and clinical applications.心理咨询中心心理症状评估-62 项量表(CCAPS-62)的临床有效性:进一步评估和临床应用。
J Couns Psychol. 2012 Oct;59(4):575-90. doi: 10.1037/a0029855. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
10
Interprofessional education and collaborative practice: Psychometric analysis of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale in undergraduate Serbian healthcare student context.跨专业教育与合作实践:塞尔维亚本科医疗保健专业学生的跨专业学习准备度量表的心理计量学分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jun;65:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 8.