Suppr超能文献

一线全身治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗模式和总生存情况。

Treatment Patterns and Overall Survival Associated with First-Line Systemic Therapy for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

机构信息

1 Pharmacy Outcomes Research Group, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Downey, California.

4 Pharmacy Outcomes Research Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Feb;23(2):195-205. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.2.195.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A variety of regimens are used as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which may include combination regimens and single agents, depending on histology, molecular profile, and performance status.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the types of first-line therapies and compare overall survival between therapies used for patients with advanced NSCLC in an integrated health care system.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years or older from Kaiser Permanente California with a diagnosis of stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. First systemic treatment date occurred from January 1, 2008, through September 30, 2013. Overall survival was measured as the number of months from initial treatment until death, end of enrollment, or September 30, 2014. Treatment regimens were categorized into 6 mutually exclusive groups: platinum doublets; pemetrexed-based, bevacizumab-based, and pemetrexed + bevacizumab-based combinations; singlets; and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. Subgroup analyses were performed by age group and by nonsquamous histology.

RESULTS

Of 2,081 patients, approximately half (52.3%) received platinum doublets, followed by TKIs (19.0%), pemetrexed-based regimens (13.4%), bevacizumab-regimens (8.0%), singlets (5.5%), and pemetrexed + bevacizumab-based combinations (1.8%). Median survival was longest for pemetrexed + bevacizumab-based combinations (18.5 months), followed by bevacizumab-based regimens (14.5), TKIs (12.7), pemetrexed-based regimens (10.4), doublets (9.2), and singlets (5.3). There was a significantly reduced risk of mortality for pemetrexed + bevacizumab-based combinations (HR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.42-0.94) and TKIs (HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.73-0.94) compared with doublets. Singlets were associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.22-1.84). Subgroup analysis among patients aged 65 years and over found no significant differences among treatment groups, with the exception of singlets, which were associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with doublets (HR = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.20-1.90). Among patients under aged 65 years, pemetrexed + bevacizumab-based combinations (HR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.21-0.64) and TKIs (HR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.59-0.97) were associated with a reduced risk of mortality, and singlets were associated with an increased risk (HR = 1.85; 95% CI = 1.17-2.92).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC, patients received a platinum agent with or without bevacizumab or pemetrexed, a TKI, or a single agent. Younger patients (aged < 65 years) receiving bevacizumab + pemetrexed-based combinations had a survival advantage over those receiving platinum doublets, and this finding merits further investigation. Younger patients receiving TKIs also had longer survival. Compared with platinum doublets, we found no survival advantage for older patients receiving bevacizumab or pemetrexed, which suggests that combination therapy of a platinum agent and taxane, such as carboplatin and paclitaxel, could be a reasonable option for older patients who are not candidates for targeted therapy.

DISCLOSURES

No outside funding supported this study. Rashid has received past funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas, Novartis, and Pfizer. No other authors report any potential financial conflicts of interest. Study concept and design were primarily contributed by Spence and Hui, with input from the other authors. Hui, Spence, and Rashid took the lead in data collection, and data interpretation was performed by Schottinger, Millares, and Spence, assisted by the other authors. The manuscript was written primarily by Spence, along with Chang, and revised by Spence, with input from the other authors.

摘要

背景

晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗方案多种多样,包括联合方案和单药治疗,这取决于组织学、分子谱和表现状态。

目的

描述在一个综合医疗保健系统中用于治疗晚期 NSCLC 患者的一线治疗类型,并比较不同治疗方案之间的总生存期。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 Kaiser Permanente California 年龄在 18 岁及以上、诊断为 IIIB/IV 期 NSCLC 的患者。一线全身治疗的起始日期为 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 9 月 30 日。总生存期的测量方法是从初始治疗到死亡、入组结束或 2014 年 9 月 30 日的月数。治疗方案分为 6 个互斥组:铂类双联方案;培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗、培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗和培美曲塞单药方案;单药治疗;以及酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和调整后的 Cox 比例风险模型比较生存情况。进行了年龄组和非鳞状组织学亚组分析。

结果

在 2081 名患者中,约一半(52.3%)接受了铂类双联方案,其次是 TKI(19.0%)、培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗方案(13.4%)、贝伐珠单抗方案(8.0%)、单药治疗(5.5%)和培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗方案(1.8%)。培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗方案的中位生存期最长(18.5 个月),其次是贝伐珠单抗方案(14.5 个月)、TKI(12.7 个月)、培美曲塞方案(10.4 个月)、铂类双联方案(9.2 个月)和单药治疗(5.3 个月)。与铂类双联方案相比,培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗方案(HR=0.64;95%CI=0.42-0.94)和 TKI(HR=0.83;95%CI=0.73-0.94)显著降低了死亡风险。与铂类双联方案相比,单药治疗增加了死亡风险(HR=1.50;95%CI=1.22-1.84)。在年龄≥65 岁的患者亚组分析中,除单药治疗外,各组之间没有显著差异,与铂类双联方案相比,单药治疗增加了死亡风险(HR=1.51;95%CI=1.20-1.90)。在年龄<65 岁的患者中,培美曲塞联合贝伐珠单抗方案(HR=0.36;95%CI=0.21-0.64)和 TKI(HR=0.76;95%CI=0.59-0.97)与死亡风险降低相关,而单药治疗则与死亡风险增加相关(HR=1.85;95%CI=1.17-2.92)。

结论

在这组晚期 NSCLC 患者中,患者接受了铂类药物联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗或培美曲塞、TKI 或单药治疗。接受贝伐珠单抗联合培美曲塞治疗的年轻(<65 岁)患者的生存优势优于接受铂类双联方案的患者,这一发现值得进一步研究。接受 TKI 治疗的年轻患者的生存时间也更长。与铂类双联方案相比,我们没有发现接受贝伐珠单抗或培美曲塞的老年患者有生存优势,这表明对于不适合靶向治疗的老年患者,铂类药物联合紫杉醇类药物(如卡铂和紫杉醇)的联合治疗可能是一种合理的选择。

披露

本研究没有外部资金支持。Rashid 过去曾获得过 Bristol-Myers Squibb、Astellas、Novartis 和 Pfizer 的资助。其他作者没有报告任何潜在的财务利益冲突。研究的概念和设计主要由 Spence 和 Hui 提出,其他作者也有贡献。Hui、Spence 和 Rashid 负责数据收集,数据解释由 Schottinger、Millares 和 Spence 完成,其他作者也有协助。Spence 主要负责撰写论文,Chang 也参与了论文的撰写,Spence 对论文进行了修订,并得到了其他作者的意见。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验