• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于风险的生物医学数据共享框架。

A risk-based framework for biomedical data sharing.

作者信息

Dankar Fida K, Badji Radja

机构信息

College of IT, UAEU, P.O. Box 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Sidra Medical and Research Center, P.O. Box 26999, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

J Biomed Inform. 2017 Feb;66:231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.012
PMID:28126604
Abstract

The problem of biomedical data sharing is a form of gambling; on one hand it incurs the risk of privacy violations and on the other it stands to profit from knowledge discovery. In general, the risk of granting data access to a user depends heavily upon the data requested, the purpose for the access, the user requesting the data (user motives) and the security of the user's environment. While traditional manual biomedical data sharing processes (based on institutional review boards) are lengthy and demanding, the automated ones (known as honest broker systems) disregard the individualities of different requests and offer "one-size-fits-all" solutions to all data requestors. In this manuscript, we propose a conceptual risk-aware data sharing system; the system brings the concept of risk, from all contextual information surrounding a data request, into the data disclosure decision module. The decision module, in turn, imposes mitigation measures to counter the calculated risk.

摘要

生物医学数据共享问题是一种博弈形式;一方面,它存在侵犯隐私的风险,另一方面,它有望从知识发现中获利。一般来说,向用户授予数据访问权限的风险在很大程度上取决于所请求的数据、访问目的、请求数据的用户(用户动机)以及用户环境的安全性。虽然传统的手动生物医学数据共享流程(基于机构审查委员会)冗长且要求苛刻,但自动化流程(称为诚实中介系统)忽略了不同请求的个性,为所有数据请求者提供“一刀切”的解决方案。在本手稿中,我们提出了一种概念性的风险感知数据共享系统;该系统将围绕数据请求的所有上下文信息中的风险概念引入数据披露决策模块。反过来,决策模块会采取缓解措施来应对计算出的风险。

相似文献

1
A risk-based framework for biomedical data sharing.一种基于风险的生物医学数据共享框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Feb;66:231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
2
Security controls in an integrated Biobank to protect privacy in data sharing: rationale and study design.综合生物样本库中保护数据共享隐私的安全控制措施:基本原理与研究设计。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jul 6;17(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0494-5.
3
Distributed clinical data sharing via dynamic access-control policy transformation.通过动态访问控制策略转换实现分布式临床数据共享。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 May;89:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Data Integration for Future Medicine (DIFUTURE).未来医学数据集成(DIFUTURE)
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e57-e65. doi: 10.3414/ME17-02-0022. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Observational research on the electronic superhighway; Problems on the Internet: a lawyer's perspective; The networker's perspective; Bioethics perspective; User's perspective.
Ethics Behav. 1995;5(1):105-18. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0501_7.
6
Honest broker protocol streamlines research access to data while safeguarding patient privacy.诚信中介协议在保护患者隐私的同时,简化了研究对数据的获取。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008 Nov 6:1133.
7
Privacy aware access controls for medical data disclosure on European healthgrids.欧洲健康网格上医疗数据披露的隐私感知访问控制
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;159:14-27.
8
Protection of Location Privacy Based on Distributed Collaborative Recommendations.基于分布式协同推荐的位置隐私保护
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 20;11(9):e0163053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163053. eCollection 2016.
9
Electronic sharing of health information: examples and privacy concerns.
Health Law Can. 1997 Feb;17(3):86-9.
10
Securing your PC and protecting your privacy.保护您的电脑并维护您的隐私。
Online J Issues Nurs. 2004 Oct 22;10(1):8.

引用本文的文献

1
Revolutionizing healthcare data analytics with federated learning: A comprehensive survey of applications, systems, and future directions.利用联邦学习革新医疗数据分析:应用、系统及未来方向的全面综述
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025 Jun 11;28:217-238. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.06.009. eCollection 2025.
2
A Comprehensive Survey on Security and Privacy for Electronic Health Data.电子健康数据的安全与隐私问题综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 14;18(18):9668. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189668.
3
Dynamic-informed consent: A potential solution for ethical dilemmas in population sequencing initiatives.
动态知情同意:群体测序计划中伦理困境的潜在解决方案。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Apr 2;18:913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.027. eCollection 2020.
4
Genomic variant sharing: a position statement.基因组变异共享:立场声明。
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Feb 5;4:22. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15090.2. eCollection 2019.
5
State of the art and a mixed-method personalized approach to assess patient perceptions on medical record sharing and sensitivity.评估患者对病历共享和敏感性看法的最新技术与混合方法个性化途径
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jan;101:103338. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103338. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
6
Informed Consent in Biomedical Research.生物医学研究中的知情同意
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019 Mar 25;17:463-474. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.03.010. eCollection 2019.
7
The development of large-scale de-identified biomedical databases in the age of genomics-principles and challenges.基因组时代大规模去识别生物医学数据库的发展:原则与挑战。
Hum Genomics. 2018 Apr 10;12(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0147-5.