Suppr超能文献

舍曲林与安慰剂在接受血液透析的重度抑郁症患者中的比较:一项随机、对照的可行性试验。

Sertraline Versus Placebo in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized, Controlled Feasibility Trial.

机构信息

Due to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material .

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):280-286. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02120216. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Depression is common in patients on hemodialysis, but data on the benefits and risks of antidepressants in this setting are limited. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sertraline over 6 months in patients on hemodialysis with depression to determine study feasibility, safety, and effectiveness.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients on hemodialysis at five United Kingdom renal centers completed the Beck Depression Inventory II. Those scoring ≥16 and not already on treatment for depression were invited to undergo diagnostic interview to confirm major depressive disorder. Eligible patients with major depressive disorder were randomized to receive the study medication-either sertraline or placebo. Outcomes included recruitment and dropout rates, change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Beck Depression Inventory II, and qualitative information to guide design of a large-scale trial.

RESULTS

In total, 709 patients were screened and enrolled between April of 2013 and October of 2014; 231 (32.6%) had Beck Depression Inventory II scores ≥16, and 68 (29%) of these were already receiving treatment for depression. Sixty-three underwent diagnostic interview, 37 were diagnosed with major depressive disorder, and 30 were randomized; 21 completed the trial: eight of 15 on sertraline and 13 of 15 on placebo (P=0.05). Dropouts due to adverse and serious adverse events were greater in the sertraline group. All occurred in the first 3 months. Over 6 months, depression scores improved in both groups. Beck Depression Inventory II score fell from 29.1±8.4 to 17.3±12.4 (P<0.001), and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score fell from 24.5±4.1 to 10.3±5.8 (P<0.001). There were no differences between sertraline and placebo groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although small, this is the largest randomized trial to date of antidepressant medication in patients on hemodialysis. Our results highlight recruitment issues. No benefit was observed, but trial size and the substantial dropout render consideration of benefit inconclusive. A definitive trial could use shorter follow-up and include depressed patients already taking antidepressants.

摘要

背景和目的

抑郁症在血液透析患者中很常见,但关于该环境下使用抗抑郁药的益处和风险的数据有限。我们进行了一项为期 6 个月的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的舍曲林试验,以确定研究的可行性、安全性和有效性,该试验针对血液透析患者中的抑郁症患者。

设计、地点、参与者和措施:五家英国肾脏中心的血液透析患者完成了贝克抑郁量表 II。那些评分≥16 且尚未接受抗抑郁治疗的患者被邀请进行诊断性访谈以确认重度抑郁症。符合重度抑郁症的合格患者被随机分配接受研究药物——舍曲林或安慰剂。结果包括招募和脱落率、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表和贝克抑郁量表 II 的变化,以及指导大规模试验设计的定性信息。

结果

共有 709 名患者接受了筛查和登记,时间为 2013 年 4 月至 2014 年 10 月;231 名(32.6%)的贝克抑郁量表 II 评分≥16,其中 68 名(29%)已经接受了抗抑郁治疗。63 名患者接受了诊断性访谈,37 名被诊断为重度抑郁症,30 名患者被随机分组;21 名患者完成了试验:舍曲林组 8 名,安慰剂组 13 名(P=0.05)。因不良反应和严重不良反应而脱落的患者在舍曲林组更多。所有事件均发生在第 1-3 个月内。6 个月后,两组的抑郁评分均有所改善。贝克抑郁量表 II 评分从 29.1±8.4 降至 17.3±12.4(P<0.001),蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表评分从 24.5±4.1 降至 10.3±5.8(P<0.001)。舍曲林组与安慰剂组之间无差异。

结论

尽管规模较小,但这是迄今为止最大的针对血液透析患者抗抑郁药物的随机试验。我们的结果强调了招募问题。没有观察到益处,但试验规模大和大量脱落使得益处的考虑不明确。一项明确的试验可以使用更短的随访时间,并纳入已经服用抗抑郁药的抑郁患者。

相似文献

1
Sertraline Versus Placebo in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Randomized, Controlled Feasibility Trial.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):280-286. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02120216. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Rhodiola rosea versus sertraline for major depressive disorder: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Phytomedicine. 2015 Mar 15;22(3):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
9
[Use of antidepressant drugs in schizophrenic patients with depression].
Encephale. 2006 Mar-Apr;32(2 Pt 1):263-9. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76153-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive systematic review of pharmacological and non-pharmacological depression interventions for patients on dialysis.
SAGE Open Med. 2025 Aug 23;13:20503121251353028. doi: 10.1177/20503121251353028. eCollection 2025.
4
Safety and efficacy of sertraline in depression among adults undergoing dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Oct 22;86(12):7082-7093. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002677. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Screening for depression in chronic haemodialysis patients as a part of care in dialysis setting: a cross-sectional study.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 23;15:1410252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1410252. eCollection 2024.
8
Association between incident depression and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Clin Kidney J. 2023 May 26;16(11):2243-2253. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad127. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Depression in maintenance hemodialysis patients: What do we need to know?
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 24;9(9):e19383. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19383. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Interventions for fatigue in people with kidney failure requiring dialysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 31;8(8):CD013074. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013074.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验