• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问题、解释、后续:从他人身上学习的机制?

Question, Explanation, Follow-Up: A Mechanism for Learning From Others?

机构信息

Merrimack College.

Boston University.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2018 Jan;89(1):280-294. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12726. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.12726
PMID:28128445
Abstract

This study explored differences in caregiver-child interactions following children's information-seeking questions. Naturalistic speech from thirty-seven 4-year-olds and their caregivers was used to explore children's information-seeking questions, the caregiver's response, and children's subsequent follow-up. Half of the families were low-socioeconomic status (SES) and the other half were mid-SES. Although children across socioeconomic groups asked a similar proportion of questions, mid-SES caregivers offered significantly more explanatory responses to causal questions as well as more noncircular explanations than low-SES caregivers. No differences were found in children's follow-up to responses given to fact-based questions; however, after hearing unsatisfactory responses to causal questions, mid-SES children were significantly more likely to provide their own explanation. Such variability in caregiver-child interaction may have implications for subsequent learning.

摘要

本研究探讨了儿童提问后照料者与儿童互动的差异。本研究使用 37 名 4 岁儿童及其照料者的自然语言,探讨了儿童的提问、照料者的回应以及儿童随后的跟进。一半家庭的社会经济地位较低,另一半家庭的社会经济地位中等。尽管来自不同社会经济群体的儿童提出的问题比例相似,但中社会经济地位的照料者提供的因果问题解释性回应以及非循环解释明显多于低社会经济地位的照料者。在儿童对基于事实的问题的回应的后续跟进方面没有发现差异;然而,在听到对因果问题的不满意回应后,中社会经济地位的儿童更有可能提供自己的解释。这种照料者与儿童互动的差异可能对后续学习产生影响。

相似文献

1
Question, Explanation, Follow-Up: A Mechanism for Learning From Others?问题、解释、后续:从他人身上学习的机制?
Child Dev. 2018 Jan;89(1):280-294. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12726. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
2
A pilot study using children's books to understand caregiver perceptions of parenting practices.一项使用儿童读物来了解照顾者对育儿实践看法的初步研究。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012 Jun;33(5):423-30. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3182560d87.
3
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
4
Caregiver-child interaction influences causal learning and engagement during structured play.照料者-儿童互动影响结构化游戏中的因果学习和参与度。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;189:104678. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104678. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
Causal learning is collaborative: Examining explanation and exploration in social contexts.因果学习具有协作性:考察社会情境中的解释和探索。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1548-1554. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1351-3.
6
Enhancing building, conversation, and learning through caregiver-child interactions in a children's museum.通过儿童博物馆中的照顾者-儿童互动来增强建筑、对话和学习。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;46(2):502-15. doi: 10.1037/a0017822.
7
Paths to child social adjustment: parenting quality and children's processing of social information.儿童社会适应的途径:养育质量与儿童对社会信息的处理
Child Care Health Dev. 2007 Jan;33(1):67-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00627.x.
8
Roles of caregiver-child interaction on the association of socioeconomic status with early childhood development: a population-based study in rural China.照料者-儿童互动对社会经济地位与儿童早期发展关系的影响:中国农村的一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):1604. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18803-4.
9
Family Typology and Appraisal of Preschoolers' Behavior by Female Caregivers.家庭类型学与女性照顾者对学龄前儿童行为的评价
Nurs Res. 2015 Nov-Dec;64(6):444-51. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000115.
10
Family socioeconomic status and Chinese preschoolers' social skills: Examining underlying family processes.家庭社会经济地位与中国学龄前儿童社会技能:探究潜在的家庭过程。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Dec;34(8):969-979. doi: 10.1037/fam0000674. Epub 2020 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Young Children's Directed Question Asking in Preschool Classrooms.幼儿在幼儿园课堂上的定向提问
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 27;14(9):754. doi: 10.3390/bs14090754.
2
Children's questions and teachers' responses about COVID-19 in Türkiye and the US.儿童对 COVID-19 的提问与美国和土耳其教师的回应
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 22;19(7):e0307475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307475. eCollection 2024.
3
Early environments and exploration in the preschool years.幼儿期的早期环境与探索。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0305353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305353. eCollection 2024.
4
Exploring the role of "in the moment" and global caregiver and child factors in caregiver questioning during shared book viewing.探究“当下”以及照顾者和儿童的整体因素在共读绘本时照顾者提问中的作用。
Cogn Dev. 2023 Apr-Jun;66. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101327. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
People are curious about immoral and morally ambiguous others.人们对不道德和道德上模棱两可的他人感到好奇。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 5;13(1):7355. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30312-9.
6
Examining children's questions and parents' responses about COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey.审视土耳其儿童关于新冠疫情的问题以及父母的回应。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jul 1:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03331-4.
7
"Why do dogs pant?": Characteristics of parental explanations about science predict children's knowledge.“狗为什么会喘气?”:父母对科学的解释特点可以预测孩子的知识。
Child Dev. 2022 Mar;93(2):326-340. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13681. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Investigating Science Together: Inquiry-Based Training Promotes Scientific Conversations in Parent-Child Interactions.共同探索科学:基于探究的训练促进亲子互动中的科学对话。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 5;11:1934. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01934. eCollection 2020.
9
Explaining individual differences in infant visual sensory seeking.解释婴儿视觉感官寻求的个体差异。
Infancy. 2020 Sep;25(5):677-698. doi: 10.1111/infa.12356. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
10
Embedding Scientific Explanations Into Storybooks Impacts Children's Scientific Discourse and Learning.将科学解释融入故事书会影响儿童的科学话语和学习。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 10;11:1016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01016. eCollection 2020.