• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释婴儿视觉感官寻求的个体差异。

Explaining individual differences in infant visual sensory seeking.

机构信息

Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck University of London, London, UK.

Department of Psychology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Infancy. 2020 Sep;25(5):677-698. doi: 10.1111/infa.12356. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1111/infa.12356
PMID:32748567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7496506/
Abstract

Individual differences in infants' engagement with their environment manifest early in development and are noticed by parents. Three views have been advanced to explain differences in seeking novel stimulation. The optimal stimulation hypothesis suggests that individuals seek further stimulation when they are under-responsive to current sensory input. The processing speed hypothesis proposes that those capable of processing information faster are driven to seek stimulation more frequently. The information prioritization hypothesis suggests the differences in stimulation seeking index variation in the prioritization of incoming relative to ongoing information processing. Ten-month-old infants saw 10 repetitions of a video clip and changes in frontal theta oscillatory amplitude were measured as an index of information processing speed. Stimulus-locked P1 peak amplitude in response to checkerboards briefly overlaid on the video at random points during its presentation indexed processing of incoming stimulation. Parental report of higher visual seeking did not relate to reduced P1 peak amplitude or to a stronger decrease in frontal theta amplitude with repetition, thus not supporting either the optimal stimulation or the processing speed hypotheses. Higher visual seeking occurred in those infants whose P1 peak amplitude was greater than expected based on their theta amplitude. These findings indicate that visual sensory seeking in infancy is explained by a bias toward novel stimulation, thus supporting the information prioritization hypothesis.

摘要

婴儿在环境中参与的个体差异在发育早期就表现出来,并被父母注意到。有三种观点被提出来解释寻求新刺激的差异。最佳刺激假说认为,当个体对当前的感官输入反应不足时,他们会寻求进一步的刺激。处理速度假说提出,那些能够更快地处理信息的人会更频繁地寻求刺激。信息优先化假说则表明,在优先处理传入信息与正在进行的信息处理方面,刺激寻求指数的差异会有所不同。10 个月大的婴儿观看了 10 次视频剪辑,并且测量了额部 theta 振荡幅度的变化,作为信息处理速度的指标。当视频播放过程中随机出现棋盘格时,对视频进行短暂叠加,以响应棋盘格的刺激锁定 P1 峰值幅度,作为处理传入刺激的指标。父母报告的更高视觉寻求与 P1 峰值幅度的降低或额部 theta 幅度随重复的强烈降低无关,因此既不支持最佳刺激假说,也不支持处理速度假说。那些 P1 峰值幅度大于基于其 theta 幅度预期的婴儿,出现了更高的视觉寻求。这些发现表明,婴儿期的视觉感官寻求是由对新刺激的偏好所解释的,因此支持信息优先化假说。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/a72f3edf8e03/INFA-25-677-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/28afe8440e7c/INFA-25-677-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/a3f7378f1e83/INFA-25-677-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/e93e6287775c/INFA-25-677-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/2d324b42bb20/INFA-25-677-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/a49dc538a47f/INFA-25-677-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/a72f3edf8e03/INFA-25-677-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/28afe8440e7c/INFA-25-677-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/a3f7378f1e83/INFA-25-677-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/e93e6287775c/INFA-25-677-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/2d324b42bb20/INFA-25-677-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/a49dc538a47f/INFA-25-677-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc3/7496506/a72f3edf8e03/INFA-25-677-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Explaining individual differences in infant visual sensory seeking.解释婴儿视觉感官寻求的个体差异。
Infancy. 2020 Sep;25(5):677-698. doi: 10.1111/infa.12356. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
2
Frontal theta activity is pronounced during illusory perception.在错觉感知过程中,额叶θ波活动明显。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Dec;94(3):445-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.08.585. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
3
Spontaneous EEG theta activity controls frontal visual evoked potential amplitudes.自发性脑电图θ活动控制额叶视觉诱发电位幅度。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Mar;108(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00039-7.
4
Functional Dissociation of θ Oscillations in the Frontal and Visual Cortices and Their Long-Range Network during Sustained Attention.在持续注意力期间,额叶和视觉皮层中的θ 振荡及其长程网络的功能分离。
eNeuro. 2019 Nov 15;6(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0248-19.2019. Print 2019 Nov/Dec.
5
When Conflict Cannot be Avoided: Relative Contributions of Early Selection and Frontal Executive Control in Mitigating Stroop Conflict.当冲突无法避免时:早期选择和额叶执行控制在减轻 Stroop 冲突中的相对贡献。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(12):5037-5048. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz042.
6
A theta rhythm in macaque visual cortex and its attentional modulation.猕猴视觉皮层的θ节律及其注意力调制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 12;115(24):E5614-E5623. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719433115. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
What are you looking at? Infants' neural processing of an adult's object-directed eye gaze.你在看什么?婴儿对成人目标导向性目光注视的神经处理。
Dev Sci. 2008 Jan;11(1):10-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00643.x.
8
Inferences about infants' visual brain mechanisms.关于婴儿视觉脑机制的推论。
Vis Neurosci. 2013 Nov;30(5-6):185-95. doi: 10.1017/S0952523813000497.
9
Role of the occipito-temporal theta rhythm in hand visual identification.顶颞叶θ节律在手视觉识别中的作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Jan 1;123(1):167-177. doi: 10.1152/jn.00267.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Error-related medial frontal theta activity predicts cingulate-related structural connectivity.错误相关的额中线θ活动可预测扣带相关的结构连接。
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1373-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.072. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
WTools: A MATLAB-based toolbox for time-frequency analysis of infant data.WTools:一个基于MATLAB的用于婴儿数据时频分析的工具箱。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0323179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323179. eCollection 2025.
2
The Infant and Toddler Curiosity Questionnaire: A Validated Caregiver-Report Measure of Curiosity in Children From 5 to 24 Months.婴幼儿好奇心问卷:一种经过验证的由照料者报告的5至24个月儿童好奇心测量工具。
Infancy. 2025 Jan-Feb;30(1):e70001. doi: 10.1111/infa.70001.
3
Neural Markers of Attention at 6 Months Associate With Later Attentional Control Performance.

本文引用的文献

1
Infants' Preferences for Familiarity and Novelty During the Course of Visual Processing.婴儿在视觉加工过程中对熟悉与新奇的偏好。
Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):491-507. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0104_9. Epub 2000 Oct 1.
2
Increased cortical reactivity to repeated tones at 8 months in infants with later ASD.在有后续 ASD 的婴儿中,8 个月时对重复音调的皮质反应增强。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0393-x.
3
Exploring the Sensory Profiles of Children on the Autism Spectrum Using the Short Sensory Profile-2 (SSP-2).
6 个月时的注意力神经标志物与后期注意力控制表现相关。
Dev Sci. 2025 Jan;28(1):e13582. doi: 10.1111/desc.13582.
4
Behavioral and Brain Reactivity Associated With Drug-Related and Non-Drug-Related Emotional Stimuli in Methamphetamine Addicts.甲基苯丙胺成瘾者中与药物相关和非药物相关情绪刺激相关的行为和大脑反应性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 24;16:894911. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.894911. eCollection 2022.
5
Not all babies are in the same boat: Exploring the effects of socioeconomic status, parental attitudes, and activities during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic on early Executive Functions.并非所有婴儿都处于相同的处境:探讨 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间社会经济地位、父母态度和活动对早期执行功能的影响。
Infancy. 2022 May;27(3):555-581. doi: 10.1111/infa.12460. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Behavioural and neural markers of tactile sensory processing in infants at elevated likelihood of autism spectrum disorder and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.自闭症谱系障碍和/或注意缺陷多动障碍高风险婴儿的触觉感觉处理的行为和神经标记物。
J Neurodev Disord. 2021 Jan 4;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s11689-020-09334-1.
使用短版感觉统合失调量表 2(SSP-2)探索自闭症谱系儿童的感觉特征。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 May;49(5):2069-2079. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03889-2.
4
Sensory features as predictors of adaptive behaviors: A comparative longitudinal study of children with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities.感觉特征可预测适应行为:自闭症谱系障碍和其他发育障碍儿童的比较纵向研究。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Oct;81:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
5
Development of brain functional connectivity and its relation to infant sustained attention in the first year of life.大脑功能连接的发展及其与婴儿生命第一年持续性注意力的关系。
Dev Sci. 2019 Jan;22(1):e12703. doi: 10.1111/desc.12703. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
6
The Efficiency of Infants' Exploratory Play Is Related to Longer-Term Cognitive Development.婴儿探索性玩耍的效率与长期认知发展相关。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 31;9:635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00635. eCollection 2018.
7
Neural oscillations during conditional associative learning.条件关联学习期间的神经振荡。
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 1;174:485-493. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.053. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
Sensory Subtypes in Preschool Aged Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍学龄前儿童的感觉亚型。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Jun;48(6):2139-2147. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3468-2.
9
Sensory processing difficulties in school-age children born very preterm: An exploratory study.极早产学龄儿童的感觉加工困难:一项探索性研究。
Early Hum Dev. 2018 Feb;117:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Curiosity-based learning in infants: a neurocomputational approach.基于好奇心的婴儿学习:一种神经计算方法。
Dev Sci. 2018 Jul;21(4):e12629. doi: 10.1111/desc.12629. Epub 2017 Oct 26.