1 Université Bretagne Loire, INSERM UMR 1063, Angers, France.
2 Département de Pneumologie and.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1244-1252. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201609-1817OC.
Endothelial dysfunction, a major predictor of late cardiovascular events, is linked to the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
To determine whether treatment with mandibular advancement device, the main alternative to continuous positive airway pressure, improves endothelial function in patients with severe OSA.
In this trial, we randomized patients with severe OSA and no overt cardiovascular disease to receive 2 months of treatment with either effective mandibular advancement device or a sham device. The primary outcome, change in reactive hyperemia index, a validated measurement of endothelial function, was assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. An embedded microsensor objectively measured treatment compliance.
A total of 150 patients (86% males; mean [SD] age, 54 [10] yr; median [interquartile range] apnea-hypopnea index, 41 [35-53]; mean [SD] Epworth sleepiness scale, 9.3 [4.2]) were randomized to effective mandibular advancement device (n = 75) or sham device (n = 75). On intention-to-treat analysis, effective mandibular advancement device therapy was not associated with improvement of endothelial function compared with the sham device. Office and ambulatory blood pressure outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Effective mandibular advancement device therapy was associated with significant improvements in apnea-hypopnea index (P < 0.001); microarousal index (P = 0.008); and symptoms of snoring, fatigue, and sleepiness (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) objective compliance was 6.6 (1.4) h/night with the effective mandibular advancement device versus 5.6 (2.3) h/night with the sham device (P = 0.006).
In moderately sleepy patients with severe OSA, mandibular advancement therapy reduced OSA severity and related symptoms but had no effect on endothelial function and blood pressure despite high treatment compliance. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01426607).
内皮功能障碍是心血管事件发生的主要预测因素,与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的严重程度相关。
确定下颌前伸装置(CPAP 的主要替代治疗方法)治疗是否能改善重度 OSA 患者的内皮功能。
本试验将重度 OSA 且无明显心血管疾病的患者随机分为两组,分别接受有效下颌前伸装置或假装置治疗 2 个月。主要结局指标是反应性充血指数(内皮功能的有效测量指标)的变化,采用意向治疗进行评估。嵌入式微传感器客观地测量了治疗依从性。
共纳入 150 例患者(86%为男性;平均年龄[标准差]54[10]岁;中位数[四分位数间距]呼吸暂停低通气指数 41[35-53];平均[标准差]Epworth 嗜睡量表评分为 9.3[4.2]),随机分为有效下颌前伸装置组(n=75)或假装置组(n=75)。意向治疗分析显示,与假装置相比,有效下颌前伸装置治疗与内皮功能改善无关。两组诊室和动态血压的结果无差异。有效下颌前伸装置治疗与呼吸暂停低通气指数(P<0.001)、微觉醒指数(P=0.008)和打鼾、疲劳和嗜睡症状(P<0.001)显著改善相关。有效下颌前伸装置治疗的平均(标准差)客观依从性为 6.6(1.4)小时/夜,而假装置为 5.6(2.3)小时/夜(P=0.006)。
在患有中重度 OSA 且嗜睡程度适中的患者中,尽管治疗依从性较高,但下颌前伸疗法降低了 OSA 的严重程度和相关症状,但对内皮功能和血压没有影响。该临床试验已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT 01426607)注册。