Schilberg Lukas, Schuhmann Teresa, Sack Alexander T
1 Maastricht University.
2 Maastricht Brain Imaging Center.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1022-1032. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01100. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
We combined patterned TMS with EMG in several sessions of a within-subject design to assess and characterize intraindividual reliability and interindividual variability of TMS-induced neuroplasticity mechanisms in the healthy brain. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) was applied over M1 to induce long-term potentiation-like mechanisms as assessed by changes in corticospinal excitability. Furthermore, we investigated the association between the observed iTBS effects and individual differences in prolonged measures of corticospinal excitability. Our results show that iTBS-induced measures of neuroplasticity suffer from high variability between individuals within a single assessment visit and from low reliability within individuals across two assessment visits. This indicates that both group and individual effects of iTBS on corticospinal excitability cannot be assumed to be reliable and therefore need to be interpreted with caution, at least when measured by changes in the amplitudes of motor-evoked potentials.
我们在一项被试内设计的多个实验环节中将模式化重复经颅磁刺激(TMS)与肌电图(EMG)相结合,以评估和描述健康大脑中TMS诱导的神经可塑性机制的个体内可靠性和个体间变异性。在运动皮层(M1)施加间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS),以诱导类似长时程增强的机制,这通过皮质脊髓兴奋性的变化来评估。此外,我们研究了观察到的iTBS效应与皮质脊髓兴奋性延长测量中的个体差异之间的关联。我们的结果表明,iTBS诱导的神经可塑性测量在单次评估访视中个体间存在高度变异性,在两次评估访视中个体内可靠性较低。这表明,iTBS对皮质脊髓兴奋性的群体效应和个体效应都不能被认为是可靠的,因此至少在通过运动诱发电位幅度变化进行测量时,需要谨慎解释。