• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿立哌唑与安非他酮增效治疗对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的重度抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机、前瞻性、开放标签研究

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Aripiprazole Versus Bupropion Augmentation in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Unresponsive to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: A Randomized, Prospective, Open-Label Study.

作者信息

Cheon Eun-Jin, Lee Kwang-Hun, Park Young-Woo, Lee Jong-Hun, Koo Bon-Hoon, Lee Seung-Jae, Sung Hyung-Mo

机构信息

From the *Department of Psychiatry, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu; †Department of Neuropsychiatry, Dongguk University Kyungju Hospital, Kyungju; ‡Department of Neuropsychiatry, Daegu Fatima Hospital; §Department of Psychiatry, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine; ∥Department of Psychiatry, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu; and ¶Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Pochon Cha University, Cha Hospital, Gumi, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Apr;37(2):193-199. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000663.

DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000000663
PMID:28129308
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole versus bupropion augmentation in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) unresponsive to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

METHODS

This is the first randomized, prospective, open-label, direct comparison study between aripiprazole and bupropion augmentation. Participants had at least moderately severe depressive symptoms after 4 weeks or more of SSRI treatment. A total of 103 patients were randomized to either aripiprazole (n = 56) or bupropion (n = 47) augmentation for 6 weeks. Concomitant use of psychotropic agents was prohibited. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale, Iowa Fatigue Scale, Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale, Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire scores were obtained at baseline and after 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, both treatments significantly improved depressive symptoms without causing serious adverse events. There were no significant differences in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale, and Iowa Fatigue Scale scores, and response rates. However, significant differences in remission rates between the 2 groups were evident at week 6 (55.4% vs 34.0%, respectively; P = 0.031), favoring aripiprazole over bupropion. There were no significant differences in adverse sexual events, extrapyramidal symptoms, or akathisia between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that aripiprazole augmentation is at least comparable to bupropion augmentation in combination with SSRI in terms of efficacy and tolerability in patients with MDD. Both aripiprazole and bupropion could help reduce sexual dysfunction and fatigue in patients with MDD. Aripiprazole and bupropion may offer effective and safe augmentation strategies in patients with MDD who are unresponsive to SSRIs. Double-blinded trials are warranted to confirm the present findings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较阿立哌唑与安非他酮增效治疗对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗无效的重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是第一项阿立哌唑与安非他酮增效治疗的随机、前瞻性、开放标签、直接对照研究。在接受4周或更长时间的SSRI治疗后,参与者至少有中度严重的抑郁症状。总共103名患者被随机分为阿立哌唑组(n = 56)或安非他酮组(n = 47)进行为期6周的增效治疗。禁止同时使用精神药物。在基线以及治疗1、2、4和6周后获取蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表、17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表、爱荷华疲劳量表、药物所致锥体外系症状量表、精神药物相关性性功能障碍问卷评分。

结果

总体而言,两种治疗均显著改善抑郁症状,且未引起严重不良事件。蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表、17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表和爱荷华疲劳量表评分以及缓解率方面无显著差异。然而,两组在第6周时的缓解率存在显著差异(分别为55.4%和34.0%;P = 0.031),阿立哌唑优于安非他酮。两组在不良性事件、锥体外系症状或静坐不能方面无显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,在MDD患者中,就疗效和耐受性而言,阿立哌唑增效治疗至少与安非他酮联合SSRI增效治疗相当。阿立哌唑和安非他酮均可帮助减轻MDD患者的性功能障碍和疲劳。阿立哌唑和安非他酮可能为对SSRI无反应的MDD患者提供有效且安全的增效策略。有必要进行双盲试验以证实本研究结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Aripiprazole Versus Bupropion Augmentation in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Unresponsive to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: A Randomized, Prospective, Open-Label Study.阿立哌唑与安非他酮增效治疗对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂无反应的重度抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机、前瞻性、开放标签研究
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Apr;37(2):193-199. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000663.
2
Efficacy of aripiprazole augmentation in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder: a subgroup analysis and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression item analyses of the Aripiprazole Depression Multicenter Efficacy study.阿立哌唑增效治疗日本重度抑郁症患者的疗效:阿立哌唑抑郁症多中心疗效研究的亚组分析以及蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表的抑郁条目分析。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jan;69(1):34-42. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12214. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
3
Comparison of adjunctive use of aripiprazole with bupropion or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors: analysis of patients beginning adjunctive treatment in a 52-week, open-label study.阿立哌唑与安非他酮或选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂/5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂联合使用的比较:一项为期52周的开放标签研究中开始接受辅助治疗患者的分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jul 18;7:459. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-459.
4
Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression or major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿立哌唑或安非他酮增效和转换治疗难治性抑郁症或重度抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0299020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299020. eCollection 2024.
5
Aripiprazole augmentation versus antidepressant switching for patients with major depressive disorder: A 6-week, randomized, rater-blinded, prospective study.阿立哌唑增效疗法与抗抑郁药换药治疗重度抑郁症患者的疗效比较:一项为期6周的随机、评估者盲法前瞻性研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jul-Aug;66-67:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 May 5.
6
Effect of Antidepressant Switching vs Augmentation on Remission Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Unresponsive to Antidepressant Treatment: The VAST-D Randomized Clinical Trial.抗抑郁药换药与增效对难治性重度抑郁症患者缓解率的影响:VAST-D随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):132-145. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8036.
7
Aripiprazole augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.阿立哌唑增强选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗难治性重度抑郁症的疗效。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;66(10):1326-30. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1017.
8
Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression.5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗抑郁症失败后的药物增效治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23;354(12):1243-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052964.
9
Resolution of sleepiness and fatigue in major depressive disorder: A comparison of bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.重度抑郁症中嗜睡和疲劳症状的缓解:安非他酮与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的比较
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Dec 15;60(12):1350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.015. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
10
Aripiprazole augmentation of antidepressants for the treatment of partially responding and nonresponding patients with major depressive disorder.阿立哌唑增强抗抑郁药治疗对重度抑郁症部分反应和无反应患者的疗效。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;66(10):1216-20. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n1002.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bupropion versus aripiprazole augmentation in adults with treatment-resistant depression: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea.安非他酮与阿立哌唑增效治疗难治性抑郁症成人患者的疗效和安全性比较:韩国一项全国性队列研究
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 17;68(1):e22. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1815.
2
Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole or bupropion augmentation and switching in patients with treatment-resistant depression or major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿立哌唑或安非他酮增效和转换治疗难治性抑郁症或重度抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0299020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299020. eCollection 2024.
3
Thoughtful prescribing for patients with difficult-to-treat depression.为治疗困难型抑郁症患者进行审慎处方。
Can Fam Physician. 2023 Nov;69(11):777-783. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6911777.
4
Use of Contrave, Naltrexone with Bupropion, Bupropion, or Naltrexone and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Literature Review.Contrave(纳曲酮与安非他酮复方制剂)、纳曲酮、安非他酮或纳曲酮的使用与主要不良心血管事件:一项系统文献综述
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Sep 29;15:3049-3067. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S381652. eCollection 2022.
5
Pretreatment anxious depression as a predictor of side effect frequency and severity in escitalopram and aripiprazole adjunctive therapy.治疗前焦虑抑郁是依西酞普兰和阿立哌唑辅助治疗中副作用频率和严重程度的预测因子。
Brain Behav. 2022 May;12(5):e2555. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2555. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
6
Augmentation strategies for treatment resistant major depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗抵抗性重度抑郁症的增强策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:385-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.134. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
7
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Clozapine: Clinically Relevant Interactions and Considerations.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与氯氮平:临床相关相互作用及注意事项
Neurol Int. 2021 Sep 1;13(3):445-463. doi: 10.3390/neurolint13030044.
8
Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 17;12(12):CD010557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010557.pub2.
9
The impact of depression medications on oral antidiabetic drug adherence in patients with diabetes and depression.抑郁药物对伴发抑郁的糖尿病患者口服抗糖尿病药物依从性的影响。
J Diabetes Complications. 2018 May;32(5):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
Fatigue in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Prevalence, Burden and Pharmacological Approaches to Management.重性抑郁障碍患者的疲劳:患病率、负担和药物治疗方法。
CNS Drugs. 2018 Jan;32(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0490-z.