Suppr超能文献

探索影响群体安全效应强度的因素。

Exploring factors influencing the strength of the safety-in-numbers effect.

作者信息

Elvik Rune

机构信息

Institute of Transport Economics, Gaustadalleen 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Mar;100:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

Abstract

Several studies have found a so-called safety-in-numbers effect for vulnerable road users. This means that when the number of pedestrians or cyclists increases, the number of accidents involving these road users and motor vehicles increases less than in proportion to the number of pedestrians or cyclists. In other words, travel becomes safer for each pedestrian or cyclist the more pedestrians or cyclists there are. This finding is highly consistent, but estimates of the strength of the safety-in-numbers effect vary considerably. This paper shows that the strength of the safety-in-numbers effect is inversely related to the number of pedestrians and cyclists. A stronger safety-in-numbers is found when there are few pedestrians or cyclists than when there are many. This finding is counterintuitive and one would expect the opposite relationship. The relationship between the ratio of the number of motor vehicles to the number of pedestrians or cyclists and the strength of the safety-in-numbers effect is ambiguous. Possible explanations of these tendencies are discussed.

摘要

多项研究发现,对于易受伤害的道路使用者存在一种所谓的“人数安全效应”。这意味着,当行人或骑自行车的人的数量增加时,涉及这些道路使用者与机动车的事故数量的增长幅度小于行人或骑自行车的人数量的增长比例。换句话说,行人或骑自行车的人越多,每个行人或骑自行车的人的出行就越安全。这一发现高度一致,但对“人数安全效应”强度的估计差异很大。本文表明,“人数安全效应”的强度与行人和骑自行车的人的数量呈负相关。行人或骑自行车的人较少时比人数较多时能发现更强的“人数安全效应”。这一发现有违直觉,人们原本预期会是相反的关系。机动车数量与行人或骑自行车的人数量的比例和“人数安全效应”的强度之间的关系并不明确。文中讨论了这些趋势的可能解释。

相似文献

1
Exploring factors influencing the strength of the safety-in-numbers effect.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Mar;100:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
3
Safety-in-numbers: Estimates based on a sample of pedestrian crossings in Norway.
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jun;91:175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
The non-linearity of risk and the promotion of environmentally sustainable transport.
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 Jul;41(4):849-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 May 9.
5
Exploring the safety in numbers effect for vulnerable road users on a macroscopic scale.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Dec;109:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
A problem of the safety of vulnerable road users in Montenegro.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2018 Dec;25(4):352-364. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2018.1431936. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
7
Adult pedestrian and cyclist injuries in Lilongwe, Malawi: a cross-sectional study.
Malawi Med J. 2020 Dec;32(4):197-204. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v32i4.4.
8
Pedestrian injuries due to collisions with bicycles in New York and California.
J Safety Res. 2014 Dec;51:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
9
Safety-in-numbers: An updated meta-analysis of estimates.
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Factors influencing safety in a sample of marked pedestrian crossings selected for safety inspections in the city of Oslo.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 May 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验