Menting Theo P, Ergun Mehmet, Bruintjes Moira H D, Wever Kimberley E, Lomme Roger M L M, van Goor Harry, Warlé Michiel C
Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation, SYRCLE, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan 28;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0310-x.
In animal studies, remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and anesthetic preconditioning are successful in reducing renal ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI), however the protective effect of RIPC may be improved by repeating the RIPC stimulus.
Sprague-Dawley rats underwent unilateral nephrectomy followed by 30 min of renal pedicle clamping. Animals were allocated into six groups: sham, control (IRI), RepISO (daily isoflurane anesthesia), RIPC (single dose isoflurane anesthesia and single dose RIPC), RepISO + RIPC (7-day isoflurane anesthesia and single dose RIPC) and RepISO + RepRIPC (7-day isoflurane anesthesia with 7-day RIPC). RIPC was applied by 3×5 min of cuff inflation on both thighs. Serum creatinine and urea levels were measured and histology was obtained at day two.
RepISO diminished renal IRI, as reflected by a significant reduction in serum creatinine levels as compared to the control group, 170 ± 74 resp. 107 ± 29 μmol/L. The other preconditioning protocols showed similar reduction in serum creatinine levels as compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed between the different preconditioning protocols. For urea levels, only RepISO + RIPC resulted in significantly lower levels as compared to the control group, 14 ± 4 resp. 22 ± 7 mmol/L (p = 0.010). In the preconditioning groups only RepISO showed less histological damage as compared to controls 1.73 ± 1.19 resp. 2.91 ± 1.22 (p = 0.032).
In this study no additional protective effect of repeated ischemic preconditioning was observed as compared to single dose RIPC. Repeated administration of isoflurane provided stronger protection against renal IRI as compared to single dose isoflurane.
在动物研究中,远程缺血预处理(RIPC)和麻醉预处理可成功减轻肾缺血再灌注损伤(IRI),然而,重复RIPC刺激可能会增强其保护作用。
将Sprague-Dawley大鼠行单侧肾切除术,然后肾蒂夹闭30分钟。动物被分为六组:假手术组、对照组(IRI)、重复异氟烷麻醉组(RepISO,每日异氟烷麻醉)、RIPC组(单剂量异氟烷麻醉和单剂量RIPC)、RepISO + RIPC组(7天异氟烷麻醉和单剂量RIPC)和RepISO + 重复RIPC组(7天异氟烷麻醉和7天RIPC)。通过对双侧大腿进行3×5分钟的袖带充气来实施RIPC。在术后第二天测量血清肌酐和尿素水平,并进行组织学检查。
与对照组相比,RepISO减轻了肾IRI,血清肌酐水平显著降低,对照组为170±74,RepISO组为107±29μmol/L。与对照组相比,其他预处理方案的血清肌酐水平也有类似程度的降低。不同预处理方案之间未观察到显著差异。对于尿素水平,只有RepISO + RIPC组与对照组相比显著降低,对照组为22±7,RepISO + RIPC组为14±4 mmol/L(p = 0.010)。在预处理组中,只有RepISO组与对照组相比组织学损伤较轻,对照组为2.91±1.22,RepISO组为1.73±1.19(p = 0.032)。
在本研究中,与单剂量RIPC相比,未观察到重复缺血预处理的额外保护作用。与单剂量异氟烷相比,重复给予异氟烷对肾IRI提供了更强的保护。