• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物学科学领域一年级博士生的信贷性别不平等的时间。

Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences.

机构信息

Department of Instructional Technology & Learning Sciences and

Department of Pediatrics, Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology Division, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0237.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.16-08-0237
PMID:28130271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5332047/
Abstract

Equitable gender representation is an important aspect of scientific workforce development to secure a sufficient number of individuals and a diversity of perspectives. Biology is the most gender equitable of all scientific fields by the marker of degree attainment, with 52.5% of PhDs awarded to women. However, equitable rates of degree completion do not translate into equitable attainment of faculty or postdoctoral positions, suggesting continued existence of gender inequalities. In a national cohort of 336 first-year PhD students in the biological sciences (i.e., microbiology, cellular biology, molecular biology, developmental biology, and genetics) from 53 research institutions, female participants logged significantly more research hours than males and were significantly more likely than males to attribute their work hours to the demands of their assigned projects over the course of the academic year. Despite this, males were 15% more likely to be listed as authors on published journal articles, indicating inequality in the ratio of time to credit. Given the cumulative advantage that accrues for students who publish early in their graduate careers and the central role that scholarly productivity plays in academic hiring decisions, these findings collectively point to a major potential source of persisting underrepresentation of women on university faculties in these fields.

摘要

公平的性别代表性是科学劳动力发展的一个重要方面,以确保有足够数量的个体和多样化的观点。从学位获得程度的标志来看,生物学是所有科学领域中性别最公平的学科,有 52.5%的博士学位授予女性。然而,学位完成率的公平并不能转化为教职或博士后职位的公平获得,这表明性别不平等仍然存在。在一个由 53 个研究机构的 336 名生物科学(即微生物学、细胞生物学、分子生物学、发育生物学和遗传学)一年级博士生组成的全国队列中,女性参与者的研究时间明显多于男性,而且在整个学年中,她们比男性更有可能将工作时间归因于其指定项目的要求。尽管如此,男性在已发表的期刊文章中被列为作者的可能性要高出 15%,这表明在时间到学分的比例上存在不平等。鉴于在研究生涯早期发表论文的学生所获得的累积优势,以及学术生产力在学术招聘决策中所扮演的核心角色,这些发现共同指向了这些领域大学教职中女性代表性持续不足的一个主要潜在来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eac/5332047/910379d74049/ar4fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eac/5332047/52d2a535134e/ar4fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eac/5332047/4baf30370ad7/ar4fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eac/5332047/910379d74049/ar4fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eac/5332047/52d2a535134e/ar4fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eac/5332047/4baf30370ad7/ar4fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eac/5332047/910379d74049/ar4fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences.生物学科学领域一年级博士生的信贷性别不平等的时间。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0237.
2
Careers of an elite cohort of U.S. basic life science postdoctoral fellows and the influence of their mentor's citation record.美国基础生命科学博士后精英群体的职业发展及其导师引文记录的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Nov 15;10:80. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-80.
3
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
4
Graduate education in the biomedical sciences: critical observations on training for research careers.生物医学科学领域的研究生教育:对研究职业培训的批判性观察。
Acad Med. 1994 Oct;69(10):779-99. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199410000-00001.
5
A proposal to establish master's in biomedical sciences degree programs in medical school environments.一项关于在医学院校环境中设立生物医学科学硕士学位项目的提议。
Acad Med. 2009 Apr;84(4):464-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a7dd8.
6
Structure and belonging: Pathways to success for underrepresented minority and women PhD students in STEM fields.结构与归属:少数族裔和女性 STEM 博士生取得成功的途径。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0209279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209279. eCollection 2019.
7
Mentoring practices that predict doctoral student outcomes in a biological sciences cohort.预测生物科学队列中博士生成果的指导实践。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0305367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305367. eCollection 2024.
8
Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women.生命科学领域的杰出男性教职人员雇用的女性较少。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10107-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403334111. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
9
Academic PHD School at Faculty of Agriculture in Tirana, Albania.阿尔巴尼亚地拉那农业学院学术博士学院
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2010;75(1):143-7.
10
U.S. postdoctoral careers in life sciences, physical sciences and engineering: Government, industry, and academia.美国生命科学、物理科学和工程领域的博士后职业:政府、工业界和学术界。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0263185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263185. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Forward steps, lingering gaps: gender representation among distinguished speakers at professional conferences.前进的步伐,尚存的差距:专业会议知名演讲者中的性别代表性
Bioscience. 2025 Jun 30;75(9):737-746. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaf063. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Unveiling disparity: A call to action for gender diversity in anatomy journal editorial teams.揭示差距:呼吁解剖学杂志编辑团队实现性别多元化的行动号召。
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Jun;18(6):558-567. doi: 10.1002/ase.70034. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
3
Activity for CUREs to increase student understanding and application of responsible authorship and publication practices.

本文引用的文献

1
Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women.生命科学领域的杰出男性教职人员雇用的女性较少。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10107-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403334111. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
2
When trying hard isn't natural: women's belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns.当努力不再自然而然:女性在以男性为主导的 STEM 领域中的归属感和动力是与努力付出的担忧有关的。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Feb;39(2):131-43. doi: 10.1177/0146167212468332. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
3
The matilda effect in science: awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000s.
促进本科生科研经验(CUREs)活动,以增强学生对负责任的作者身份和出版实践的理解与应用。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Aug 29;25(2):e0000924. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00009-24. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
4
The role of research competence as an influencing factor for the careers of young academics. Findings and implications from studies on doctorates in medicine and life sciences in Germany.研究能力作为影响年轻学者职业发展的因素的作用。德国医学和生命科学博士研究的发现和启示。
GMS J Med Educ. 2023 Nov 15;40(6):Doc70. doi: 10.3205/zma001652. eCollection 2023.
5
Distribution of Female and Male First and Last Authorship across Drug Delivery Related Journals with Respect to Year and Journal Impact Factor.按年份和期刊影响因子分析药物输送相关期刊中女性和男性第一作者和最后作者的分布情况。
Mol Pharm. 2023 Aug 7;20(8):4219-4227. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00328. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
6
Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.探索学术科学六个关键领域的性别偏见:对抗性合作。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2023 Jul;24(1):15-73. doi: 10.1177/15291006231163179. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
Scientific collaborations are precarious territory for women.科学合作对女性来说是充满风险的领域。
Nature. 2022 May;605(7908):179-181. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01204-1.
8
Why Psychology Needs to Stop Striving for Novelty and How to Move Towards Theory-Driven Research.心理学为何应停止追求新奇以及如何转向理论驱动的研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 28;12:609802. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609802. eCollection 2021.
9
Understanding the Transient Nature of STEM Doctoral Students' Research Self-Efficacy Across Time: Considering the Role of Gender, Race, and First-Generation College Status.理解理工科博士生研究自我效能感随时间变化的短暂性:考虑性别、种族和第一代大学生身份的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 26;12:617060. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617060. eCollection 2021.
10
Authorship Policies at U.S. Doctoral Universities: A Review and Recommendations for Future Policies.美国博士学位授予大学的学术作者身份政策:回顾与未来政策建议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3393-3413. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00273-7. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
科学界的“玛蒂尔达效应”:20 世纪 90 年代至 21 世纪初美国的奖项和奖品。
Soc Stud Sci. 2012 Apr;42(2):307-20. doi: 10.1177/0306312711435830.
4
Survival analysis of faculty retention in science and engineering by gender.按性别对科学与工程领域教师保留率进行生存分析。
Science. 2012 Feb 17;335(6070):864-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1214844.
5
Data with hierarchical structure: impact of intraclass correlation and sample size on type-I error.具有层次结构的数据:组内相关和样本量对I型错误的影响
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 20;2:74. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00074. eCollection 2011.
6
Gender, performance level, and competence standards in task groups.任务小组中的性别、表现水平和能力标准。
Soc Sci Res. 2009 Jun;38(2):447-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.10.004.
7
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.双盲评审有利于增加女性作者的代表性。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jan;23(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
8
Does gender matter?性别重要吗?
Nature. 2006 Jul 13;442(7099):133-6. doi: 10.1038/442133a.
9
Authorship: the coin of the realm, the source of complaints.作者身份:学术领域的关键所在,也是引发抱怨的源头。
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):216-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.216.
10
The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.科学中的马太效应。对科学的奖励和交流系统进行了探讨。
Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):56-63.