Litson Kaylee, Blaney Jennifer M, Feldon David F
Department of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Department of Educational Leadership, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 26;12:617060. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617060. eCollection 2021.
Developing research self-efficacy is an important part of doctoral student preparation. Despite the documented importance of research self-efficacy, little is known about the progression of doctoral students' research self-efficacy over time in general and for students from minoritized groups. This study examined both within- and between-person stability of research self-efficacy from semester to semester over 4 years, focusing on doctoral students in biological sciences ( = 336). Using random intercept autoregressive analyses, we evaluated differences in stability across gender, racially minoritized student status, and first-generation student status. Results showed similar mean levels of self-efficacy across demographic groups and across time. However, there were notable differences in between-person and within-person stability over time, specifically showing higher between-person and lower within-person stability for racially minoritized and first-generation students. These findings indicate that racially minoritized and first-generation students' research self-efficacy reports were less consistent from semester to semester. Such results may indicate that non-minoritized and continuing-generation students' experiences from semester to semester typically reinforce their beliefs about their own abilities related to conducting research, while such is not the case for racially minoritized nor first-generation students. Future research should examine what types of experiences impact self-efficacy development across doctoral study to offer more precise insights about factors that influence these differences in within-person stability.
培养研究自我效能感是博士生培养的重要组成部分。尽管研究自我效能感的重要性已有文献记载,但总体而言,对于博士生研究自我效能感随时间的发展情况,以及少数族裔学生的情况,我们了解得还很少。本研究考察了4年中各学期之间以及个体内部研究自我效能感的稳定性,重点关注生物科学领域的博士生(n = 336)。通过随机截距自回归分析,我们评估了不同性别、少数族裔学生身份和第一代大学生身份在稳定性上的差异。结果显示,不同人口统计学群体以及不同时间的自我效能感平均水平相似。然而,随着时间推移,个体之间和个体内部的稳定性存在显著差异,具体表现为少数族裔和第一代学生的个体间稳定性较高,个体内稳定性较低。这些发现表明,少数族裔和第一代学生的研究自我效能感报告在各学期之间不太一致。这样的结果可能表明,非少数族裔和非第一代学生各学期的经历通常会强化他们对自己研究能力的信念,而少数族裔和第一代学生并非如此。未来的研究应该考察在博士学习过程中,哪些类型的经历会影响自我效能感的发展,以便更准确地了解影响个体内稳定性差异的因素。